Identifying competencies in advanced healthcare practice: an umbrella review.

The four pillars of advanced healthcare practice (AHCP) are clinical practice, leadership and management, education, and research. It is unclear, however; how competencies of AHCP as defined by individual health professions relate to these pillars. Addressing this knowledge gap will help to facilitate the operationalization of AHCP as a concept and help inform educational curricula. To identify existing competencies across AHCP literature and examine how they relate to the four pillars of a multi-professional AHCP framework. An umbrella review was conducted in accordance with JBI methodology. The electronic search for published and grey literature was completed using CINAHL, Scopus, Medline (OVID), Embase (OVID), ERIC (OVID) and Google. Secondary reviews and research syntheses of master level AHCP programs published after 1990 in either English or French were considered for inclusion and results were analyzed using a directed content analysis. Seventeen publications detailing 620 individual competencies were included. AHCP competencies were described across four professions and 22 countries, with many publications related to nursing and AHCP in the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia. Many retrieved competencies were found to map to the four pillars of AHCP, although clinical practice and leadership and management pillars were addressed more often. Competencies of AHCP are generally consistent with the four pillars. However, the distribution of competencies is unequal across pillars, professions, and geographical regions, which may provide direction for further research. Doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/KV2FD Published on March 07, 2023.

The Effect of Staged Versus Usual Care Physiotherapy on Knee Function Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

CONTEXT: The long duration and high cost of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) rehabilitation can pose barriers to completing rehabilitation, the latter stages of which progress to demanding sport-specific exercises critical for a safe return to sport. A staged approach shifting in-person physiotherapy sessions to later months of recovery may ensure patients undergo the sport-specific portion of ACLR rehabilitation. Design/Objective: To compare postoperative outcomes of knee function in patients participating in a staged ACLR physiotherapy program to patients participating in usual care physiotherapy through a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: One hundred sixty-two patients were randomized to participate in staged (n = 80) or usual care physiotherapy (n = 82) following ACLR and assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. The staged group completed the ACLR rehabilitation protocol at home for the first 3 months, followed by usual care in-person sessions. The usual care group completed in-person sessions for their entire rehabilitation. Outcome measures included the Lower Extremity Functional Scale, International Knee Documentation Committee Questionnaire, pain, range of motion, strength, and hop testing. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant between-group differences in measures of knee function at 6 months postoperative. Patients in the usual care group reported significantly higher International Knee Documentation Committee scores at 3 months postoperative (mean difference = 5.8; 95% confidence interval,  1.3 to 10.4; P = .01). CONCLUSION: A staged approach to ACLR rehabilitation does not appear to impede knee function at 6 months postoperative but may result in worse patient reported outcomes at early follow-ups.

Longitudinal changes in the lower extremity functional scale after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructive surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the pattern of change in lower extremity physical function status as measured by the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) during the first 16 weeks after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery and illustrate how this information can be applied in clinical practice to assist with goal setting and the evaluation of patient outcomes. The secondary objective is to estimate the test-retest reliability of the LEFS in this population. DESIGN: Prospective cohort, observational. SETTING: Physiotherapy private practice. PATIENTS: Forty-seven participants underwent ACL reconstructive surgery and were initially recruited. Two participants were excluded from the analysis, resulting in 45 participants (28 men, mean age 29.4 years; 17 women, mean age 29.0 years). INTERVENTIONS: Participants underwent a rehabilitation protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants completed the LEFS at each visit from their initial physiotherapy session to 16 weeks postsurgery. A nonlinear model of change was developed, which related LEFS scores to weeks postsurgery. Test-retest reliability was examined between the seventh and ninth weeks using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,1) and standard error of measurement (SEM). RESULTS: The nonlinear model demonstrated rapid improvements in LEFS scores within the first 7 to 8 weeks with a gradual tapering of this improvement. At 16 weeks, the predicted LEFS score was 63 out of a maximum score of 80. The LEFS demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability in this population (ICC2,1 = 0.90, SEM = 3.7). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a description of postsurgical change in functional status for patients after ACL reconstructive surgery that can assist clinicians in developing clinical goals. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A rapid improvement in lower extremity physical function is demonstrated in the first 7 to 8 weeks after ACL reconstructive surgery with a tapering of this improvement after 8 weeks.

Hop testing provides a reliable and valid outcome measure during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although various hop tests have been proposed as performance-based outcome measures following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, limited reports of their measurement properties exist. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and longitudinal validity of data obtained from hop tests during rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction. SUBJECTS: Forty-two patients, 15 to 45 years of age, who had undergone ACL reconstruction participated in the study. METHODS AND MEASURES: The study design was prospective and observational with repeated measures. The subjects performed a series of 4 hop tests on 3 separate occasions within the 16th week following surgery and on a fourth occasion 6 weeks later. The tests were a single hop for distance, a 6-m timed hop, a triple hop for distance, and crossover hops for distance. Performance on the ACL-reconstructed limb was expressed as a percentage of the performance on the nonoperative limb, termed the "limb symmetry index." Subjects also completed the Lower Extremity Functional Scale and a global rating of change questionnaire. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients for limb symmetry index values ranged from .82 to .93. Standard errors of measurement were 3.04% to 5.59%. Minimal detectable changes, at the 90% confidence level, were 7.05% to 12.96%. Changes in hop test scores on the operative limb were statistically greater than changes on the nonoperative limb. Pearson correlations (r) between change in hop performances and self-reported measures ranged from .26 to .58. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The results show that the described series of hop tests provide a reliable and valid performance-based outcome measure for patients undergoing rehabilitation following ACL reconstruction. These findings support the use and facilitate the interpretation of hop tests for research and clinical practice.