Modified Graham Patch Repair of Small Bowel Anastomotic Leak.

The modified Graham patch repair is a well-established technique for management of perforating foregut injuries, often learned by surgeons during general surgery training. There is, however, little to no data regarding the utilization of this technique for perforation of the distal midgut or in the re-operative field. We present two cases of midgut anastomotic complications successfully managed with modified graham patch repair at our institution. The first case is a 79-year-old female who underwent an emergent right hemicolectomy at an outside institution for management of an iatrogenic perforation during endoscopic polypectomy. Over the course of two years she underwent numerous abdominal operations, due to various complications, ultimately resulting in multiple resections and end ileostomy creation. She then had her ileostomy reversed by laparoscopic single incision (SILS) technique at our institution. This was also complicated by anastomotic leak. Intraoperatively, adequate mobilization of the anastomosis for resection was deemed not safe due to dense fibrosis and adhesions in the re-operative field; therefore, she underwent a SILS modified Graham patch repair of an ileocolic anastomotic defect with diverting loop ileostomy. Post-operatively, she had no radiographic evidence of leak from the repaired anastomosis, which facilitated successful loop ileostomy reversal five months later. Our second case is a 64-year-old male referred to our institution for management of his stage IV colon cancer. He underwent an open right hemicolectomy and hepatic metastectomy, which was complicated by anastomotic leak. The small defect was repaired via a SILS modified Graham patch technique. Five months postoperatively, he had neither radiographic nor endoscopic evidence of a leak; therefore, he successfully underwent ileostomy reversal without complication. We encourage further investigation and reporting of the role of the modified graham patch repair in management of midgut anastomotic complications, particularly when resection and re-anastomosis is unsafe due to a hostile re-operative field.

Laparoscopic vs. robotic colectomy for left-sided diverticulitis.

Diverticulitis is a prevalent gastrointestinal disease that often warrants surgical intervention. However, the optimal approach between traditional laparoscopy (LC) and robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAC) for diverticulitis remains unclear. Our research compares these techniques in patients diagnosed with left-sided diverticulitis treated at a single, tertiary referral center from 2019 to 2022. Among the 134 patients, 86 underwent laparoscopic and 48 robotic-assisted surgeries. The surgeries included in this analysis are left colectomy, sigmoid colectomy, low anterior resection, and Hartmann's procedure. Primary outcomes were major morbidity and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were operative time, conversion to open, length of stay, unplanned return to the operating room, 30-day readmission rate, and overall morbidity. While demographics and comorbidities were similar for both groups, the robotic-assisted group displayed a statistically significant longer operative time (198.0 ± 84.4 LC vs. 264.8 ± 78.5 min RAC, p < 0.001). When investigated further, there was a significant difference in operative time for uncomplicated diverticulitis cases favoring the LC approach (169.17 ± 58.1 LC vs. 244.82 ± 58.79 min RAC, p < 0.001). This significant difference, however, was not present in complicated diverticulitis cases. Other factors, such as overall and major morbidity, rate of conversion to open approach, ostomy creation, estimated blood loss, time to return of bowel function, length of stay, and 30-day readmission rate, did not significantly differ between the groups. There was no 30-day mortality in either group. Favorable patient outcomes, lack of significant difference in operative time compared with traditional laparoscopy, and absence of differences in morbidities or efficacy, raises an interesting question in the world of minimally invasive surgery: is the robotic-assisted approach emerging as the advantageous approach for complicated diverticulitis cases? We encourage additional, multi-center analysis of specifically complicated diverticulitis managed with both surgical approaches to investigate if these findings are replicated outside of our institution.

Routine Axillary Ultrasound for Patients with T1-T2 Breast Cancer Does Not Increase the Rate of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Based on Predictive Modeling.

BACKGROUND: Since publication of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial results, demonstrating that many patients with nonpalpable axillary lymph nodes and one or two positive sentinel nodes do not require axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), preoperative axillary ultrasound (AUS) has become controversial. Clinicians are concerned that AUS may lead to unnecessary ALND. The authors developed an algorithm (Algorithm 1) in which the number of AUS-suspicious nodes and tumor biology direct management. For estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer with a single AUS-suspicious node and a positive lymph node needle biopsy (LNNB), sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is performed with a specimen X-ray documenting retrieval of the clipped node. Other patients with positive LNNB receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The authors hypothesized that routine AUS and this algorithm could decrease ALND compared with a strategy of no preoperative AUS. METHODS: Decision-tree analysis and Monte Carlo simulation were used to assess the expected number of ALNDs under two strategies (routine AUS vs no AUS). Probabilities were drawn from a literature review and an institutional database. The authors assumed nodal pathologic complete response rates as reported in the literature. Four additional algorithms were created to assess whether any other treatment model could decrease the rate of ALND. RESULTS: Using the routine AUS and the authors' algorithm, the predicted ALND rate was 9%, versus 10% for a strategy of no AUS, with overlapping uncertainty intervals. The remaining treatment algorithms showed similar results. DISCUSSION: Use of AUS may help to tailor patient care without leading to overutilization of ALND, as long as neoadjuvant chemotherapy is administered when appropriate.

TelePain: Primary Care Chronic Pain Management through Weekly Didactic and Case-based Telementoring.

Chronic pain is a significant problem among military personnel and a priority of the military health system. The U.S. Army Surgeon General's Pain Management Task Force recommends using telehealth capabilities to enhance pain management. This article describes the development and evaluation of a telehealth intervention (TelePain) designed to improve access to pain specialist consultation in the military health system. The study uses a wait-list controlled clinical trial to test: 1) effectiveness of the intervention, and 2) interviews to assess barriers and facilitators of the intervention implementation. The intervention involves a didactic presentation based on the Joint Pain Education Curriculum followed by patient case presentations and multi-disciplinary discussion via videoconference by clinicians working in the military health system. A panel of pain specialists representing pain medicine, internal medicine, anesthesiology, rehabilitation medicine, psychiatry, addiction medicine, health psychology, pharmacology, nursing, and complementary and integrative pain management provide pain management recommendations for each patient case. We use the Pain Assessment Screening Tool and Outcomes Registry (PASTOR) to measure patient outcomes, including pain, sleep, fatigue, anxiety, and depression. This article reports some of the challenges and lessons learned during early implementation of the TelePain intervention. Weekly telephone meetings among the multisite research team were instrumental in problem solving, identifying problem areas, and developing solutions. Solutions for recruitment challenges included additional outreach and networking to military health providers, both building on.