Factors associated with maintaining reduction following locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Loss of reduction (LoR) can occur after locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs). This study determined biomechanical features of fracture fixation associated with preventing LoR postoperatively. One-year reoperation rates were also compared between those with/without LoR. METHODS: Population-based administrative data for 359 adults treated using a locking plate for PHF between 2010 and 2016 were examined. Two trained assessors reviewed standardized shoulder radiographs. LoR (Yes/No) was defined as any fracture displacement >0.5 cm, and/or >10° change in neck-shaft angle (NSA) alignment relative to intraoperative imaging. Multiple logistic regression assessed how the following affected maintaining reduction: (1) sex, (2) age, (3) Neer classification, (4) shaft impaction (SI), (5) shaft medialization (SM), (6) calcar reduction (CR), (7) NSA alignment, and (8) screw use. RESULTS: LoR was seen in 79 (22%) patients. LoR was significantly associated with increasing age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06/yr, P < .001), fracture severity (4-part vs. 2-part fracture; OR = 4.63, P = .001), and varus NSA alignment (<125° vs. ≥145°: OR = 5.6, P = .02; <125° vs. 125-145°, OR = 2.2, P = .02]). Patients achieving simultaneous SI, SM, and CR were significantly less likely (OR = 0.009, P < .001) to lose reduction, after controlling for age, fracture severity, and NSA alignment. If only SI was achieved, patients were still significantly less likely to lose reduction relative to achieving none of these mechanical features (OR = 0.17, P = .006). Reoperations were higher when LoR occurred (n = 26/77 [33.4%]) compared with no LoR (n = 20/276 [7.2%]) (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: SI was strongly associated with preventing LoR in patients treated using a locking plate for PHF. SI with concurrent SM, CR, and a neutral or valgus NSA had the lowest rates of LoR. LoR was associated with higher rates of reoperation.

Are clinical outcomes affected by type of plate used for management of mid-shaft clavicle fractures?

BACKGROUND: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using plate osteosynthesis for midshaft clavicle fractures is often complicated by the prominence of the implant due to the subcutaneous position of the clavicle. Reoperation rates for symptomatic clavicle plate removal have been reported to be as high as 53%. We sought to determine to which degree do clinical outcomes (all cause reoperation rate and rate of fracture union) differ between types of clavicle plates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed using our hospital database for patients treated with ORIF for mid-shaft clavicle fractures (OTA/AO type 15-B). Implants included in this review were 2.7 mm reconstruction plates, 3.5 mm reconstruction plates, 3.5 mm precontoured clavicle plates and 3.5 mm locking compression plates. The primary outcome measure was the all cause reoperation rate. Secondary outcomes compared the rate fracture union, documented infection, hardware failures and clinical symptoms at the surgical site among the various plate types. Data was collected and descriptive statistics were analyzed. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 102 midshaft clavicle fractures treated with ORIF were included in this study. The majority of patients were ≤ 50 years old (83.3%) and male (72.5%). The overall union rate for all plating constructs was 97.1%. We found that age, sex and smoking were not associated with the rate of re-operation. In addition, the fracture classification, type of implant used and number of screws used didn't increase the risk of revision surgery. In addition, more than 50% of patients complaining of pain at 6 weeks post-operatively required a second surgery for removal of hardware. Moreover, there was no association between age, sex, smoking, fracture classification or plate type and the rate of union. Interestingly, clavicle fractures fixed with 3.5 mm reconstruction plates were more likely to have hardware failure due to plastic deformation, whereas 2.7 mm plates were more likely to fail by plate breakage. CONCLUSION: Although different types of implants have different biomechanical properties, no difference in reoperation, union and plate removal rates were found between the various plate types. Future studies with a larger sample size are required to further examine these outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The Feasibility of Two Screws Anterior Fixation for Type II Odontoid Fracture Among Arabs.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of two screws anterior fixation of the odontoid process among Arab adults. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Anterior screw fixation is the treatment of choice for type II odontoid fractures. In order to perform the procedure safely, the diameter of the odontoid process should be wide enough to allow for the placement of one or two screws. METHODS: A retrospective review of 156 computed tomography scans of the cervical spine was done. The included patients were Arabs, adults (at least 18 years old), and had no evidence of upper cervical spine trauma, deformity, infection, tumor, or surgery. The minimum external transverse diameter (METD), minimum internal transverse diameter (MITD), minimum external anteroposterior diameter (MEAD), and minimum internal anteroposterior diameter (MIAD) of the odontoid process were measured. A P value of ≤0.05 was considered as the cutoff level of statistical significance. RESULTS: Our study included 94 (60.3%) males and 62 (39.7%) females. The mean age of the subjects was 37.8 ±â€Š16.9 years (range 18-85). The mean values of the METD, MITD, MEAD, and MIAD were 8.7 ±â€Š1.0 mm, 6.0 ±â€Š1.1 mm, 10.3 ±â€Š1.0 mm, and 7.4 ±â€Š1.1 mm, respectively. Men had larger diameters compared to women. This was statistically significant for METD (P = 0.035) and MEAD (P < 0.001). The METD was <9.0 mm in 95 (60.9%) subjects, while the MITD was <8.0 mm in 153 (98.1%) subjects. These findings were not significantly different between males and females. CONCLUSION: Two screws anterior fixation of type II odontoid fracture is not feasible among the majority of Arabs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.