Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 103(12): 1740-1746, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30705040

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept (IVZ) to intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) administered preoperatively to patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for severe manifestations of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DESIGN: Randomised clinical trial (RCT). METHODS: Two hundred and six patients with PDR-related complications requiring PPV were randomised into one of two treatment groups: Group A received IVZ (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) 1-10 days before PPV, while Group B received IVB (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) 1-10 days before PPV. The primary outcome was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6 months follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were perioperative tractional retinal detachment (TRD) rates, surgical times, intraoperative and postoperative complications and incidence of unplanned PPV during the 6 month study interval. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy three subjects underwent PPV and completed the 6-month follow-up interval. Group A subjects had better BCVA at 6 months (p=0.0035), shorter surgical times (p=0.0013) and were less likely to have a recurrence of vitreous haemorrhaging in the postoperative period (p=0.0101) when compared with subjects in Group B. There were no significant differences among the treatment groups with regards to baseline characteristics, perioperative TRD development, intraoperative complications and incidence of unplanned PPV during the 6 month study interval. CONCLUSIONS: This RCT demonstrated better final visual outcomes, shorter operating times and less vitreous haemorrhage recurrences in the postoperative period when subjects received IVZ compared to IVB prior to PPV for the treatment of PDR-related complications.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Angiogênese/administração & dosagem , Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Retinopatia Diabética/cirurgia , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/administração & dosagem , Vitrectomia , Hemorragia Vítrea/prevenção & controle , Retinopatia Diabética/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias , Injeções Intravítreas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Resultado do Tratamento , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidores , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Hemorragia Vítrea/fisiopatologia
2.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 187: 169, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29338851
3.
Ophthalmol Retina ; 2(10): 1010-1020, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31047488

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the optimal dosing of preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) in patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for manifestations of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred six patients with severe manifestations of PDR underwent PPV at a single university-based hospital. METHODS: Patients were randomized into 1 of 3 treatment groups: group A received 0.625 mg IVB (0.025 ml) 1 to 10 days before PPV, group B received 1.25 mg IVB (0.05 ml) 1 to 10 days before PPV, and group C received 2.5 mg IVB (0.1 ml) 1 to 10 days before PPV. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6 months. Secondary outcome measures were rates of perioperative tractional retinal detachment (TRD) development, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and incidence of unplanned PPV at 6 months. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-seven patients underwent PPV and completed 6 months of follow-up. There were no significant differences between treatment groups regarding baseline characteristics, final BCVA, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, or unplanned PPV rates. There were no patients in group A (0.0%), 3 patients in group B (7.0%), and 5 patients in group C (8.5%) who demonstrated perioperative TRD after IVB administration, but before PPV (P = 0.0283). This difference was significant between groups A and B (P = 0.0494) and between groups A and C (P = 0.0080). CONCLUSIONS: This randomized clinical trial demonstrated that patients receiving the 0.625-mg dose of IVB before PPV for the treatment of PDR-related manifestations showed similar visual acuity, but a lower incidence of perioperative TRD development compared with patients receiving the 1.25-mg and 2.5-mg doses. Clinicians should consider adopting the lowest effective dose, 0.625 mg, into clinical practice. The current study is limited by the lack of a control group receiving no IVB before PPV.

4.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 183: 1-10, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28860046

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To assess the optimal interval of preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) administration in diabetic subjects undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for severe manifestations of active proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-six patients with PDR-related complications requiring PPV were prospectively randomized into 1 of 2 treatment groups: Group A received IVB (2.5 mg/0.1 mL) 1-3 days before PPV, while Group B received IVB (2.5 mg/0.1 mL) 5-10 days before PPV. The primary outcome was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6 months follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were intraoperative surgery time, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, and incidence of unplanned PPV at 6 months follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-five subjects underwent PPV and completed the 6-month follow-up interval. Group B patients had better final BCVA (P = .033) and were less likely to have a postoperative complication (P = .018) when compared to Group A patients. The mean difference in final BCVA between groups was 0.22 logMAR (95% confidence interval: 0.02-0.43, P = .017). Group A was 3.90 (95% confidence interval: 1.08-17.31, P = .046) times more likely to have a loss of 1 or more logMAR lines of final BCVA when compared to Group B. There were no significant differences among the treatment groups with regard to baseline features, intraoperative surgery time, intraoperative complications, and incidence of unplanned PPV during the study interval. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized clinical trial demonstrated better postoperative outcomes at 6 months when subjects received preoperative IVB 5-10 days before PPV compared to 1-3 days for the treatment of PDR-related complications.


Assuntos
Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Retinopatia Diabética/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Vitrectomia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Inibidores da Angiogênese/administração & dosagem , Retinopatia Diabética/diagnóstico , Retinopatia Diabética/cirurgia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Angiofluoresceinografia , Seguimentos , Fundo de Olho , Humanos , Injeções Intravítreas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Retina/patologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA