Brucellosis in dialysis patients. Does it exist?

BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease transmittable to humans. It is diagnosed either by isolation of Brucella organism in culture of blood or other sample types (e.g., bone marrow or liver biopsy specimens), or by a combination of serological tests and clinical findings. Dialysis patients constitute a special population group with an impaired autoimmune system and a propensity to develop infections, such as brucellosis. This paper presents the high incidence of brucellosis in our dialysis patients during last year, while there was not any zoonotic infection recorded in the previous at least 5 year period. METHODS-RESULTS: This is a retrospective study including 8 dialysis patients, undergoing renal replacement therapies (5 patients were on hemodialysis (HD) and 3 on peritoneal dialysis (PD)), who out of a total of 124 patients developed brucellosis, during the last year. Four patients were male and four female and their mean age was 67 +/- 9 years. Clinical presentation of Brucellosis infection was mild with low-grade fever and symptoms of influenza. All patients were living in places where animal brucellosis was prevalent. Infection was diagnosed on the basis of clinical symptoms and signs and with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of peripheral blood. The affected patients had consumed fresh unpasteurized milk and cheese and were treated with oral doxycycline and oral rifampicin for 6 weeks. All patients are in follow up for at least 1 year, during which there were no relapses. CONCLUSIONS: Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease that can occur in dialysis patients who are susceptible to infection under certain conditions. Our brucellosis patients lived in agricultural and veterinary areas and had consumed unpasteurized milk and cheese and insufficiently cooked meat derived from infected animals.

A newly described vancomycin-resistant ST412 Enterococcus faecium predominant in Greek hospitals.

A total of 359 vancomycin-resistant enterococci (344 Enterococcus faecium and 15 E. faecalis) collected during 2007 from eight tertiary-care hospitals in Greece were analysed for genotypic characteristics. Four common clones, ST412, ST203, ST16 and ST17, were identified among E. faecium and one clone, ST28, among E. faecalis strains.

In vitro activity of daptomycin against Gram-positive cocci: the first multicentre study in Greece.

A total of 10420 Gram-positive cocci (including staphylococci, enterococci and various groups of streptococci) collected from clinically significant specimens in ten Greek hospitals during 2006--2007 were tested for their susceptibility to daptomycin. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by the broth microdilution method. Daptomycin demonstrated very high activity against Enterococcus faecalis (MIC at which 50% of the isolates were inhibited (MIC50) = 1mg/L and MIC at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited (MIC90) = 1.36 mg/L), Enterococcus faecium (MIC50 = 1.36 mg/L and MIC90 = 1.90 mg/L), Streptococcus pyogenes (MIC50 = 0.12 mg/L and MIC90 = 0.50mg/L), Streptococcus agalactiae (MIC50 = 0.09 mg/L and MIC90 = 0.12 mg/L), Streptococcus pneumoniae (MIC50 = 0.24 mg/L and MIC90 = 0.5 mg/L) and viridans group streptococci (MIC50 = 0.50 mg/L and MIC90 = 0.89 mg/L). Resistance to linezolid and vancomycin for enterococci and to penicillin for streptococci appears to be independent of reduced susceptibility to daptomycin. On the other hand, daptomycin was also active against meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MIC50 = 0.44 mg/L and MIC90 = 0.78 mg/L) and meticillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MIC50 = 0.24 mg/L and MIC90 = 0.44 mg/L); however, 0.9% of the staphylococci tested had an MIC > 1mg/L, which is the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoint proposed for susceptibility. For all tested organism groups, resistance to daptomycin was not associated with glycopeptide resistance.

Diagnostic usefulness of bone marrow aspiration material for the amplification of IS6110 insertion element in extrapulmonary tuberculosis: comparison of two PCR techniques.

SETTING: In many cases of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB), with the exception of paucibacillary analysed specimens, the suspected site of mycobacterial infection is relatively inaccessible or unknown, making laboratory confirmation of TB laborious and problematic. OBJECTIVE: Two different polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based methods were compared to investigate the validity of bone marrow aspiration material as an easily accessible alternative sample for molecular analysis in EPTB. DESIGN: We amplified the same sequence of IS6110 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in 19 confirmed cases of EPTB using two different nested PCR techniques: one in-house 'classic' PCR and another based on LightCycler technology. RESULTS: Both methods demonstrated the same reliability when performed in samples of infected tissue. However, the LightCycler protocol was superior to the in-house system when applied in bone marrow aspiration material, revealing positivity in 18/19 compared to 13/19 samples of 'classic' PCR. CONCLUSION: The application of an optimised LightCycler nested amplification protocol in bone marrow aspirates may promote diagnostic accuracy in difficult and/or urgent cases of EPTB.