RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) provide health organisations insight into how 'person-centric' care is. Qualitative data in PREMs surveys provide essential context about experience but are challenging to analyse at an organisational level. OBJECTIVE: To co-design a person-centred coding framework to assist in the analysis of qualitative PREMs data. PATIENT INVOLVEMENT: Consumer representatives were involved in problem identification, co-design, coding of raw data (testing), evaluation and manuscript authorship. METHODOLOGY: Co-design principles guided production of a deductive coding framework with Picker Principles of Person-Centred Care as a conceptual framework. The framework was co-designed over 4 stages, with cross-professional stakeholders (including two consumer representatives): 1) assessment of current state and understanding priorities; 2) adapting Picker Principles of Person-Centred Care as a coding framework; 3) testing and evaluation of a coding template over two quality improvement (QI) cycles against measures of inter-coder reliability and perceived usefulness; 4) endorsement and planning for implementation. RESULTS: The Picker Principles were a suitable coding framework for inpatient PREMs data, and a coding template in an electronic spreadsheet met end-user needs. Results of the first QI cycle indicated a need for 'less academic' domain names and definitions, which were reviewed and updated to a first-person perspective in partnership with a consumer representative. Inter-coder reliability measures and qualitative feedback improved after cycle two testing and evaluation. DISCUSSION: This single site study produced a feasible solution to apply person-centred principles to analyse PREMs data and requires testing in different settings. Cross-disciplinary partnerships enabled the development of a reliable and acceptable deductive coding framework that was usable for people without prior experience in qualitative data analysis. PRACTICAL VALUE: Our solution offers an example for health services to harness the value of qualitative PREMs data and partner with consumers to take person-centric action to improve the safety, equity, and experience of healthcare.
Assuntos
Participação do Paciente , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/métodos , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao PacienteRESUMO
AIM: To report the feasibility of delivering and the effectiveness of brief Group Transdiagnostic Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (TCBT) via Zoom for anxiety and/or depression in primary care. METHODS: Participants were eligible for this open-label study if their primary care clinician recommended brief psychological intervention for clinically diagnosed anxiety and/or depression. Group TCBT included an individual assessment followed by four x 2-hour manualised therapy sessions. Primary outcome measures assessed recruitment, adherence to treatment and reliable recovery measured using the PHQ-9 and GAD-7. RESULTS: Twenty-two participants received TCBT over three groups. Recruitment and adherence to TCBT met feasibility thresholds for delivering group TCBT via Zoom. Improvements in the PHQ-9, GAD-7 and reliable recovery were present 3 and 6 months following treatment commencement. CONCLUSION: Brief TCBT delivered using Zoom is a feasible treatment for anxiety and depression diagnosed in primary care. Definitive RCTs are required to provide confirmatory evidence of efficacy for brief group TCBT in this setting.
Assuntos
Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Depressão , Humanos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento , Nova Zelândia , Ansiedade/terapia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , CogniçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Distal-to-proximal technique has been recommended for anticancer therapy administration. There is no evidence to suggest that a 24-hour delay of treatment is necessary for patients with a previous venous puncture proximal to the administration site. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify if the practice of 24-hour delay between a venous puncture and subsequent cannulation for anticancer therapies at a distal site is necessary for preventing extravasation. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted with 72 outpatients receiving anticancer therapy via an administration site distal to at least 1 previous venous puncture on the same arm in a tertiary cancer center in Australia. Participants were interviewed and assessed at baseline data before treatment and on day 7 for incidence of extravasation/phlebitis. RESULTS: Of 72 participants with 99 occasions of treatment, there was 1 incident of infiltration (possible extravasation) at the venous puncture site proximal to the administration site and 2 incidents of phlebitis at the administration site. CONCLUSION: A 24-hour delay is unnecessary if an alternative vein can be accessed for anticancer therapy after a proximal venous puncture. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Infiltration can occur at a venous puncture site proximal to an administration site in the same vein. However, the nurse can administer anticancer therapy at a distal site if the nurse can confidently determine that the vein of choice is not in any way connected to the previous puncture site through visual inspection and palpation.