Neurocognitive functioning in a Romanian cohort of young adults with parenterally-acquired HIV-infection during childhood.

The Romanian cohort can provide valuable information about the effect of chronic HIV-infection and exposure to combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) on the developing brain, based on its unique characteristics: young adults infected parenterally with HIV clade F in the late 1980s and exposed to cART for a decade. We conducted a prospective study using a neuropsychological test battery validated in other international HIV cohorts, in order to evaluate the rate and severity of neurocognitive impairment in a group of young Romanian adults. The 49 HIV-infected (HIV+) participants and the 20 HIV negative (HIV-) controls were similar for age and gender, although the HIV- group tended to be more educated. We found higher cognitive impairment prevalence in the HIV+ group (59.1 %) versus the HIV- group (10 %), and the impairment rate remained significantly higher even when the groups were matched based on the educational level (38.7 % for the HIV+ group vs. 10.0 % for the HIV- controls; p = 0.025). The nadir CD4 count was <200 in 71.4 % of patients, but at the time of neurocognitive assessment, 89.5 % of patients had normal immunological status and 81.8 % undetectable HIV load. Among the HIV-impaired group, 26 % of the participants had syndromic impairment while the other 74 % had asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment. We found a high prevalence of neurocognitive dysfunction in the Romanian young adults growing-up with HIV. The greatest HIV-related cognitive deficits were in the domains of executive and motor functioning, consistent with a frontosubcortical pattern.

Relationships among neurocognitive status, medication adherence measured by pharmacy refill records, and virologic suppression in HIV-infected persons.

BACKGROUND: Optimal antiretroviral therapy (ART) effectiveness depends on medication adherence, which is a complex behavior with many contributing factors, including neurocognitive function. Pharmacy refill records offer a promising and practical tool to assess adherence. METHODS: A substudy of the CHARTER (CNS HIV Anti-Retroviral Therapy Effects Research) study was conducted at the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) and the University of Washington. Pharmacy refill records were the primary method to measure ART adherence, indexed to a "sentinel" drug with the highest central nervous system penetration-effectiveness score. Standardized neuromedical, neuropsychological, psychiatric, and substance use assessments were performed at enrollment and at 6 months. Regression models were used to determine factors associated with adherence and relationships between adherence and changes in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid HIV RNA concentrations between visits. RESULTS: Among 80 (33 at JHU and 47 at University of Washington) participants, the mean adherence score was 86.4%, with no difference between sites. In the final multivariable model, better neurocognitive function was associated with better adherence, especially among participants who were at JHU, male, and HIV infected for a longer period of time. Worse performance in working memory tests was associated with worse adherence. Better adherence predicted greater decreases in cerebrospinal fluid HIV RNA between visits. CONCLUSIONS: Poorer global neurocognitive functioning and deficits in working memory were associated with lower adherence defined by a pharmacy refill record measure, suggesting that assessments of cognitive function, and working memory in particular, may identify patients at risk for poor ART adherence who would benefit from adherence support.

The role of cohort studies in drug development: clinical evidence of antiviral activity of serotonin reuptake inhibitors and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in the central nervous system.

BACKGROUND: Effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) has reduced the incidence of HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment (HNCI) but its prevalence remains high. Clinical trials have yet to identify a consistently effective treatment for HNCI, other than ART, but in vitro data support that some drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for other indications might benefit individuals with HNCI. Some of these drugs, such as serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), may do so by reducing HIV replication in the CNS and are already widely used by HIV-infected individuals. METHODS: Six-hundred fifty-eight HIV-infected participants of the CHARTER cohort had a baseline assessment, which included comprehensive neuropsychological (NP) testing and HIV RNA measurements in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Four-hundred sixty-seven (71%) subjects used ART, 195 (30%) used SRIs, and 63 (10%) used statins. RESULTS: SRI users were less likely to have HIV RNA levels in CSF above 50 copies (c)/mL (29 vs. 37% in non-SRI users, OR 0.69, p = 0.05). This association was most evident for three of the seven SRIs (citalopram, sertraline, and trazodone, or "antiviral" SRIs, combined 25 vs. 38% in non-SRI users, OR 0.56, p = 0.01) and was strongest in those not taking concomitant ART (61 vs. 83%, OR 0.31, p = 0.01). "Antiviral" SRI users also performed better on NP tests (median global deficit score 0.37 vs. 0.47, p = 0.04). Statin users were also less likely to have HIV RNA levels in CSF above 50 c/mL (16 vs. 37%, p < 0.001) but, in contrast to SRIs, the association was strongest in those taking ART (2 vs. 18%, p < 0.001). Statin use was not associated with better NP performance. Multivariate analyses indicated that the use of "antiviral" SRIs-but not statins-was associated with undetectable HIV RNA levels in CSF and better NP performance. CONCLUSIONS: SRIs may reduce HIV replication in CSF and improve NP performance. This was particularly true for three SRIs-supporting differences in antiviral efficacy between drugs-in individuals who were not taking ART. In contrast, statins were not associated with lower HIV replication in CSF in multivariate analyses and were not associated with better NP performance. These analyses support the value of large observational cohort studies in identifying FDA-approved drugs that may be worth further investigation.