No difference in sensory outcome between vertical and oblique incisions for hamstring graft harvest during ACL reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To compare the incidence, extent of sensory loss, its clinical effect and natural course caused by sensory nerve injury, during two different skin incisions used for autogenous hamstring graft harvest during ACL reconstruction. METHODS: This randomized prospective study was carried out on 84 patients, divided into two groups, all of them underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon graft with two incisions; a vertical incision used in 43 patients, and an oblique incision in 41 patients. The location and area of sensory loss were evaluated during follow-up as well as the degree of improvement and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The average age in this study was 29.8 ± 7.2 in the vertical group and 29.9 ± 6.3 in the oblique group. Both semitendinosus and gracilles were harvested in 34 patients, semitendinosus in 49 patients and gracilles in one patient. In the vertical group, a higher incidence of sensory loss was recorded with 21 patients (51.2%), relative to the oblique group with 18 patients (41.9%). However, there was no statistically significant difference (p = n.s). Most of the sensory loss affected the distribution of the IPBSN (infrapatellar branch of saphenous nerve) in 27 patients (69.2%) in both groups, and to a lesser extent in the lower medial area [distribution of SBSN (sartorial branch of saphenous nerve)] in 12 patients (30.8%). CONCLUSION: This study clearly revealed the high incidence of nerve injury particularly the IPBSN during hamstring graft harvest, but did not prove a difference between oblique and vertical incisions, with regard to postoperative sensory loss. It was clear that harvesting the semitendinosus alone is not a factor that can diminish nerve injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Role of arthroscopy for the diagnosis and management of post-traumatic hip pain: a prospective study.

The current published literature regarding the role of hip arthroscopy in the diagnosis and management of post-traumatic hip pain is still limited. Therefore, we conducted the present prospective study to determine the value of hip arthroscopy in the diagnosis and management of various causes of hip pain after traumatic conditions. The present study included a prospective cohort of 17 patients with symptomatic post-traumatic hip pain. It was conducted between July 2013 and May 2018. The mean age was 22 (19-29) years and the mean follow-up was 24 (r: 7-36) months. Prior to surgery, every eligible patient underwent assessment of functional status using the Modified Harris Hip Score, Oxford hip score (OHS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score. All patients underwent arthroscopic management for their diagnosed pathologies. The most commonly encountered diagnosis was labral tear (58.8%), followed by ligamentum teres tear (35.3%) and loose intra-articular fragments (29.4%). In addition, 52.9% of the patients had associated CAM lesion and 11.8% had associated Pincer lesion. The mHSS, OHS and WOMAC score showed significant improvement in the post-operative period (P < 0.001), all the 17 patients had 100% Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State; only one patient did not achieve minimal clinical importance difference. One case underwent labral debridement for failed labral repair (5.8%), another patient developed maralgia paraesthetica (5.8%). In conclusion, hip arthroscopy is a useful and effective minimally invasive procedure for the diagnosis and management of selected patients with post-traumatic hip pain. Moreover, hip arthroscopy was safe technique with no reported serious adverse events.