Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 15(7): 719-26, 2004 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15231886

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare in a pilot study, the retrievability and inferior vena cava (IVC) wall reaction elicited by uncoated and paclitaxel-coated Günther-Tulip filters in the animal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three groups with five pigs each underwent infrarenal IVC implantation of Günther-Tulip filters. Paclitaxel-coated filters were used in Groups A and B and uncoated filters were used in Group C. Filters were removed at 14, 19, 22, 26, and 30 days after implantation. A laparotomy was performed to remove filters from animals in group A and filters from animals in groups B and C that could not be retrieved via the right transjugular approach. Filter-induced venous wall changes were evaluated by examination of IVC venography, feasibility of filter removal at different implantation times, and laparotomy and microscopic findings. Feasibility of filter retrieval and venous wall changes were correlated. RESULTS: IVC cavography showed no abnormality. Filters in animals in group B were uneventfully removed by a right jugular approach. Uncoated filter removal was not feasible in three of five animals in group C (19, 22, and 26 days). Microscopically, animals in group A had absent filter-induced IVC wall changes at 14, 19, 22, and 26 days and minimal changes at 30 days post implantation; animals in group B had absent filter-induced IVC wall changes at 14, 19, and 22 days and minimal changes at 26 and 30 days; animals in group C had moderate filter-induced IVC wall changes at 14 days and severe changes at 19, 22, 26, and 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that endothelial reaction to the presence of IVC filters in the porcine model is diminished by addition of paclitaxel coating to these filters. Further studies are necessary to substantiate these results.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/administração & dosagem , Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Filtros de Veia Cava , Animais , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis , Masculino , Modelos Animais , Projetos Piloto , Suínos , Filtros de Veia Cava/efeitos adversos , Veia Cava Inferior
2.
Semin Intervent Radiol ; 21(3): 205-16, 2004 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21331130

RESUMO

Up to 85% of patients who present with colonic obstruction have a colorectal cancer. Between 7% and 29% of these patients present with total or partial intestinal obstruction. Only 20% of these patients presenting with acute colonic obstruction due to malignancy survive 5 years. Emergent surgical intervention in patients with colonic obstruction is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates. Only 40% of patients with obstructive carcinoma of the left colon can be treated with surgical resection without the need for a colostomy. The use of a temporary or permanent colostomy has a significant impact on quality of life. The decompressive effect seen with colonic stenting is a durable, simple, and effective palliative treatment of patients with advanced disease. Stent deployment provides an effective solution to acute colonic obstruction and allows surgical treatment of the patient in an elective and more favorable condition. In addition, colonic stenting reduces costs and avoids the need for a colostomy.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...