Risk-Adapted Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Concomitant Fluoropyrimidine-Radiotherapy Neoadjuvant Treatment for Patients With Resectable CT3-4 or N+ Rectal Cancer: Five-Year Disease-Free Survival Results of a Single-Center Series.

BACKGROUND: Providing adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is currently a matter of debate. Recommendations from clinical guidelines range from offering no treatment to oxaliplatin-based combinations. We present a risk-adapted approach based on the response to initial chemoradiation as the strongest prognostic factor for disease-free survival (DFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred one patients were treated at a single institution with preoperative long-course radiotherapy plus concurrent fluoropyrimidines. Patients with disease downstaged to pT0-2N0 received adjuvant fluoropyrimidines alone, while the remaining received an oxaliplatin-based combination. The primary study end point was 5-year DFS. RESULTS: Overall, the disease of 54 patients was downstaged to pT0-2N0 (53.5%), while that of 47 patients was staged as pT3-4 or N+ (46.5%) after surgery. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 5-year DFS for patients in the good-prognosis group (downstaging to pT0-2 N0) and for those with poor prognosis (pT3-4 or N+) were 79.4% and 66.3%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.489; P = .043). Downstaging and pN+ were independent prognostic factors for DFS. CONCLUSION: A risk-adapted adjuvant therapy strategy based on pathologic stage after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is feasible and achieves high rates of 5-year DFS. Patients with good prognostic factors can be treated with adjuvant fluoropyrimidines alone, thus permitting the avoidance of oxaliplatin-derived toxicities.

Colon cancer molecular subtypes identified by expression profiling and associated to stroma, mucinous type and different clinical behavior.

BACKGROUND: Colon cancer patients with the same stage show diverse clinical behavior due to tumor heterogeneity. We aimed to discover distinct classes of tumors based on microarray expression patterns, to analyze whether the molecular classification correlated with the histopathological stages or other clinical parameters and to study differences in the survival. METHODS: Hierarchical clustering was performed for class discovery in 88 colon tumors (stages I to IV). Pathways analysis and correlations between clinical parameters and our classification were analyzed. Tumor subtypes were validated using an external set of 78 patients. A 167 gene signature associated to the main subtype was generated using the 3-Nearest-Neighbor method. Coincidences with other prognostic predictors were assesed. RESULTS: Hierarchical clustering identified four robust tumor subtypes with biologically and clinically distinct behavior. Stromal components (p < 0.001), nuclear ß-catenin (p = 0.021), mucinous histology (p = 0.001), microsatellite-instability (p = 0.039) and BRAF mutations (p < 0.001) were associated to this classification but it was independent of Dukes stages (p = 0.646). Molecular subtypes were established from stage I. High-stroma-subtype showed increased levels of genes and altered pathways distinctive of tumour-associated-stroma and components of the extracellular matrix in contrast to Low-stroma-subtype. Mucinous-subtype was reflected by the increased expression of trefoil factors and mucins as well as by a higher proportion of MSI and BRAF mutations. Tumor subtypes were validated using an external set of 78 patients. A 167 gene signature associated to the Low-stroma-subtype distinguished low risk patients from high risk patients in the external cohort (Dukes B and C:HR = 8.56(2.53-29.01); Dukes B,C and D:HR = 1.87(1.07-3.25)). Eight different reported survival gene signatures segregated our tumors into two groups the Low-stroma-subtype and the other tumor subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified novel molecular subtypes in colon cancer with distinct biological and clinical behavior that are established from the initiation of the tumor. Tumor microenvironment is important for the classification and for the malignant power of the tumor. Differential gene sets and biological pathways characterize each tumor subtype reflecting underlying mechanisms of carcinogenesis that may be used for the selection of targeted therapeutic procedures. This classification may contribute to an improvement in the management of the patients with CRC and to a more comprehensive prognosis.

Risk-adapted adjuvant chemotherapy after concomitant fluoropyrimidine-radiotherapy neoadjuvant treatment for patients with resectable cT3-4 or N+ rectal cancer.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer is not well defined.After neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery, at least a short period of treatment with 5-fluorouracil is recommended, and some investigators claim a more aggressive approach, in particular, for those patients with a high risk of systemic relapse. Nevertheless, there are few studies about adjuvant combination therapy tolerance and efficacy, and no randomized trials have been conducted comparing fluoropyrimidines versus combination therapy such as folinic acid plus 5-fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin(FOLFOX), considered the standard of care in stage IIIcolon cancer. We present an institutional series of risk adapted adjuvant therapy. Sixty evaluable patients who had received treatment with neoadjuvant fluoropyrimidine radiotherapy and surgery now received adjuvant fluoropyrimidines in the case of pT0-2N0 or oxaliplatin based combination in the case of pT3-4 or N+ . Overall, 33 patients experienced downstaging to pT2-0N0 (55%) and27 patients were restaged as pT3-4 or N+ (45%) after surgery. Local recurrence rate was 5% (three patients), one local and one local plus systemic in the adjuvant single agent group and one local plus systemic in the adjuvant FOLFOX group. Systemic relapse occurred in 14 patients(23.3%), five (15%) in the single-agent group and nine(33.3%) in the FOLFOX group. Disease-free survival at 3 years for patients in the good prognostic group(pT0-2N0) and poor prognostic group (pT3-4 or N+ ) were 78.7 and 62.2%, respectively. Severe diarrhoea was more frequent with fluoropyrimidines and neutropenia, mucositis and peripheral neuropathy were more common with FOLFOX. There were no toxic deaths. A risk-adapted adjuvant therapeutic decision is feasible with an acceptable safety profile even with the use of oxaliplatin based combinations. Three-year disease-free survival compares favourably with historical controls, especially in those patients with high risk factors for relapse.Phase III controlled trials are needed.

Circulating tumor cells in solid tumor in metastatic and localized stages.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was the detection of circulating tumor cells (CTC) in three tumor types of epithelial origin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred and thirty-eight patients with breast cancer (56.2% localized and 43.8% metastatic), 195 with colorectal tumors (84.1% localized and 15.9% metastatic) and 50 with prostate cancer (52% localized and 48% metastatic) took part in this study. CTC quantification was performed using the CellSpotter Analyzer (Veridex LLC). RESULTS: 31.5% of patients with cancer had > or =2 CTCs/7.5 mL but none of the healthy volunteers were above this level (p<0.001). Among patients with metastatic disease, 62.3% of them had > or =2 CTCs/7.5 mL but only 14.0% of those with localized disease were above this level (p<0.001). The presence of CTCs were correlated to stage in the three studied tumor types and no differences in the number of cells were found between them. CONCLUSION: The presence of more than 2 CTCs/7.5 ml is a frequent event in metastatic cases. In particular, patients with localized disease who have more than 2 CTCs/7.5 ml should be carefully studied to determine the possible prognostic and predictive value of this finding.

A phase I, dose-finding study of irinotecan (CPT-11) short i.v. infusion combined with fixed dose of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) protracted i.v. infusion in adult patients with advanced solid tumours.

PURPOSE: Irinotecan (CPT-11) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) are effective cytotoxic agents in the treatment of solid tumours. Continuous i.v. infusion (CI) of 5-FU is significantly more active and better tolerated than bolus i.v. 5-FU. This phase I pharmacokinetic and clinical study evaluated escalating CPT-11 doses administered every 3 weeks combined with a fixed dose of 5-FU CI over 14 days to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of this combined chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with solid tumours showing failure with previous standard treatment or for whom no established curative therapy existed received CPT-11 i.v. over 90 min (six dose levels were evaluated: 150, 175, 200, 250, 300 and 350 mg/m(2)) plus a fixed dose of 5-FU CI 250 mg/m(2) per day over 14 days. If the MTD was not reached at CPT-11 level 6, then 5-FU was increased to 300 mg/m(2). In step 2, 5-FU was administered as a true protracted infusion at the recommended dose found during step 1. In step 3, the recommended dose of CPT-11 was divided and administered in a weekly schedule for 4 weeks combined with a fixed dose of 5-FU CI 250 mg/m(2), and then followed by 2-5 weeks rest. RESULTS: Neutropenia and diarrhoea were the main toxicities, leading to early termination of infusion in three of six patients in level 7. Therefore, CPT-11 350 mg/m(2) + 5-FU 250 mg/m(2) CI over 14 days was identified as the recommended dose. In step 2, CPT-11 dose had to be reduced to 300 mg/m(2) due to toxicity. The weekly schedule of CPT-11 75 mg/m(2) + 5-FU 250 mg/m(2) CI was feasible with only one patient experiencing severe diarrhoea. No interactions were found in the kinetics parameters of CPT-11 or 5-FU for the different dose levels studied. CONCLUSION: CPT-11 300 mg/m(2) + 5-FU 250 mg/m(2) protracted infusion is the recommended dose for phase II trials, neutropenia and diarrhoea being the dose-limiting toxicities.

5-fluorouracil as a protracted continuous infusion plus irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with fluoropyrimidine-based regimens as first line.

We carried out a single-center series with the combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) plus protracted 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion as second-line chemotherapy for patients previously treated with a single-agent fluoropyrimidine as monotherapy or in combination with oxaliplatin. Twenty-five patients diagnosed with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) received CPT-11 300 mg/m2 every 3 weeks plus 5-FU 250 mg/m2/day as a protracted infusion. Results were as follows. Twenty-four of 25 patients were evaluable for response. Two patients achieved a complete response and five a partial response, resulting in an overall response rate of 28%. Disease stabilization was obtained in 10 patients (40%), resulting in a tumor growth control rate of 68% (17 patients) and disease progression in seven (28%). Median progression-free interval was 6 months and median overall survival was 12 months. Neutropenia and diarrhea appeared as the most frequent adverse events, being grade 3/4 in 12 and 16% of patients, respectively. Mucositis, emesis, and hand and foot syndrome were mild. We conclude that protracted 5-FU infusion plus CPT-11 is an active and safe regimen for patients with advanced CRC. A phase III trial comparing this schedule with conventional CPT-11 monotherapy is warranted.