Visual performance, safety and patient satisfaction after bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens in presbyopic patients without cataract.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) for the correction of presbyopia and to assess patient satisfaction. METHODS: Records from three centres were reviewed to select presbyopic patients having undergone bilateral refractive lens exchange and implantation of the AT LISA tri 839MP multifocal IOL. Postoperatively, monocular and binocular distance, intermediate and near visual acuities, corrected and uncorrected, and subjective refraction were measured. Patients also completed a quality of life questionnaire. Safety evaluation included IOL stability and postoperative complications. RESULTS: 72 eyes (36 patients) were analysed. No clinically significant difference between pre- and postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was found for monocular or binocular measurements. Mean postoperative monocular CDVA was 0.02 ± 0.04 logMAR. Mean refractive values all improved statistically significantly compared with preoperative baseline (p ≤ 0.0064). Overall, 82.4% of eyes had spherical equivalent within ± 0.5 D and 97.1% within ± 1.0 D of emmetropia with a mean accuracy of -0.10 ± 0.41 D. Spectacle independence for distance, intermediate and near visual acuity was 87.5%, 84.4% and 78.1% respectively, and 78.1% of patients were satisfied with their postoperative, spectacle-free vision. Eight eyes received Nd:YAG laser treatment. No other IOL-related safety issues were reported. CONCLUSION: AT LISA tri 839MP multifocal IOL bilaterally implanted in presbyopic patients provided excellent distance, intermediate and near visual outcomes with very accurate correction of refraction. These results were associated with a high level of spectacle independence and patient satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registered on https://clinicaltrials.gov/ under the identification NCT03790592 (31/12/2018).

Topical Tacrolimus for Corneal Subepithelial Infiltrates Secondary to Adenoviral Keratoconjunctivitis.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of topical tacrolimus compounded in the Pharmacy Service for the treatment of subepithelial corneal infiltrates (SEIs) secondary to adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who had been dispensed topical tacrolimus for the treatment of SEIs during the previous year. Patients were treated with tacrolimus 0.03% eye drops twice daily or tacrolimus 0.02% ointment once daily. The following data were recorded: length of treatment, visual acuity before and after treatment, intraocular pressure before, during, and at the end of treatment, previous treatments, and the presence of SEIs after treatment. The subjective symptoms of the patients were also assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (85 eyes) were included, 54.5% with bilateral involvement. A total of 31 (36.5%) eyes were treated with tacrolimus ointment and 54 eyes (63.5%) with tacrolimus eye drops. The median length of treatment was 185 days (p25-75: 93.5-426), and the mean follow-up duration was 363 days (p25-75: 148-540). In 62.35% of the eyes, the SEIs were reduced in number and size, and in 31.76%, they were eliminated. The patients had better visual acuity after treatment with highly statistically significant differences. Tolerance was good overall, being better in the eye drops group. CONCLUSIONS: Topical tacrolimus, compounded in the pharmacy, seems to be an effective and safe alternative for the treatment of SEIs secondary to adenovirus keratoconjunctivitis.