Comparison of Lumbar Epidurals and Lumbar Plexus Nerve Blocks for Analgesia Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with significant postoperative pain. Both lumbar epidurals and lumbar plexus nerve blocks have been described for postoperative pain control, but it is unclear if one technique is more beneficial. METHODS: Using electronic medical records, a randomly selected, cohort of 58 patients with lumbar epidurals were compared with 58 patients with lumbar plexus nerve blocks following primary THA. The primary end point was 48-hour postoperative opiate consumption. Secondary end points included time of first ambulation, distance ambulated, level of assistance with ambulation, presence of side effects, and time to discharge. Descriptive statistics were calculated to characterize subjects in the different block-type groups. Comparisons in morphine consumption were conducted using linear mixed models. Primary and secondary end points were examined in multivariable models. RESULTS: Patients with lumbar plexus blocks consumed less opiates at 24, 36, and 48 hours relative to patients that received lumbar epidural catheters (P = .047, .002, and .002, respectively). Patients with lumbar plexus blocks ambulated earlier (24.6 ± 2.01 hours vs 31.7 ± 3.01 hours) and farther relative to patients with epidurals (P < .001 for both) and had discharge orders written earlier (58.2 ± 6.68 hours vs 73.6 ± 6.35 hours). CONCLUSION: In comparison to lumbar epidural catheters, lumbar plexus nerve blocks are an effective pathway for postoperative pain control following primary THA. Furthermore, this clinical pathway expedites physical rehabilitation and is more compatible with postoperative prophylactic anticoagulants.

Characteristics and intraoperative treatments associated with head and neck free tissue transfer complications and failures.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between perioperative patient characteristics and treatment modalities (eg, vasopressor use and volume of fluid administration) with complications and failure rates in patients undergoing head and neck free tissue transfer (FTT). STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of medical records. SETTING: Perioperative hospitalization for head and neck FTT at 1 tertiary care medical center between January 1, 2009, and October 31, 2011. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients (N=235) who underwent head and neck FTT. Demographic, patient characteristic, and intraoperative data were extracted from medical records. Complication and failure rates within the first 30 days were collected RESULTS: In a multivariate analysis controlling for age, sex, ethnicity, reason for receiving flap, and type and volume of fluid given, perioperative complication was significantly associated with surgical blood loss (P=.019; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.16), while the rate of intraoperative fluid administration did not reach statistical significance (P=.06; 95% CI, 0.99-1.28). In a univariate analysis, FTT failure was significantly associated with reason for surgery (odds ratio, 5.40; P=.03; 95% CI, 1.69-17.3) and preoperative diagnosis of coronary artery disease (odds ratio, 3.60; P=.03; 95% CI, 1.16-11.2). Intraoperative vasopressor administration was not associated with either FTT complication or failure rate. CONCLUSIONS: FTT complications were associated with surgical blood loss but not the use of vasoactive drugs. For patients undergoing FTT, judicious monitoring of blood loss may help stratify the risk of complication and failure.