Healthcare professionals' perspective on psychosocial support: Lessons learned during a pandemic.

Purpose/Background: Assessing the level of psychosocial assistance provided for healthcare workers (HCWs) at and outside of work is crucial. This study aimed to evaluate the psychosocial support provided to HCWs and analyze its effectiveness during COVID-19 at one of the biggest hospitals in Saudi Arabia, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh. In this study, we hypothesized that psychosocial support for HCWs will enhance their performance and total welfare. Methods: This study followed a cross-sectional analytic design, and its sample comprised 380 HCWs from many specialties. Two well-known psychosocial scales, DASS-21 and MSPSS, were used to assess the availability of institutional psychosocial support and the levels of depression, anxiety, and stress among HCWs. Results: The majority of HCWs reported a tremendous increase in working hours and level of anxiety during COVID-19, and they denied receiving institutional support at work. Moreover, the majority reported receiving support from family and friends. Primarily, the most statistically significant finding in this study was that female HCWs had much higher levels of stress and anxiety during COVID-19 than their equivalent male colleagues. In addition, a significant difference was found regarding the presence of immediate supervisors for HCWs and its effectiveness in burden relief. Conclusions: The results show a marginally significant association between psychosocial support and the mental health of HCWs during COVID-19. However, we found a slightly favorable effect on the minority of HCWs who received regular check-ins or targeted interventions or had immediate supervisors.

Representation of women in orthopaedic surgery: perception of barriers among undergraduate medical students in Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: While female participation has improved in several surgical specialties over time globally, no such increase has been observed in orthopaedic surgery over the past decades. The potential barriers to female participation are likely present from the beginning of medical education. Therefore, this study assessed the apparent lag in equal representation among men and women in orthopaedic surgery in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used a questionnaire survey to investigate medical students' and interns' perceptions of women participating in orthopaedic surgery, their subspeciality preferences, and barriers preventing them from pursuing an orthopaedic career. The responses were analysed to understand general perceptions, gender-based differences, impact of clinical experiential learning, and exposure to orthopaedic surgery. RESULTS: Approximately 565 medical students (49% females, 51% males) participated in the survey. Only 17% of students (11% females, 23% males) considered orthopaedic surgery as their future career option. While 31% of female and 17% of male students disagreed with the concept of female-appropriate orthopaedic subspecialties, most of the remaining male and female students perceived paediatric orthopaedics as a female-appropriate subspecialty. Concerning equal representation of women, gender bias and lack of a strong physique were the most frequently selected barriers by female and male students, respectively. Patient preference for male orthopaedicians, gender discrimination, social and family commitments, and need for physical strength were all perceived as barriers for women in orthopaedics. Overall, clinical experience and orthopaedic exposure did not significantly improve the likelihood of female students in choosing orthopaedic surgery as a career. CONCLUSIONS: The bias against women in orthopaedic careers is prevalent among medical students early in their academic years. Clinical experience and exposure to orthopaedic surgery should be improved to make a significant impact on female participation in orthopaedic careers. Career building efforts in terms of improved career opportunities, career counselling, flexible working hours, social and family related adjustments and implementation of mentorship/research/fellowship programmes for females are needed to reduce gender discrimination and improve female orthopaedic participation. Furthermore, process improvements may yield greater flexibility for women pursuing the challenging field while accommodating other barriers faced by women in orthopaedic surgery.

Factors Influencing Sports Medicine as a Career Choice Among Orthopaedic Trainees in Saudi Arabia.

Background: Sports medicine is one of the most popular orthopaedic specialties, with more fellowship applicants than in any other subspecialty of orthopaedics. Purpose: To investigate the factors influencing orthopaedic trainees to complete their fellowships and subsequently subspecialize in sports medicine in Saudi Arabia, as well as to compare the motivational factors of trainees planning to pursue sports medicine versus other orthopaedic specialties. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: An online anonymous questionnaire was distributed to 400 orthopaedic surgical trainees from 44 training centers (residency and fellowship training programs) across Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire identified trainees planning to select sports medicine as their career and the most influential factors affecting their choice; items exploring the influential factors were answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale. A comparison of responses was performed with candidates aiming to pursue other orthopaedic specialties. The chi-square or Fisher exact test was used to compare demographic parameters and the percentage of "agree" and "strongly agree" responses between trainees opting for sports medicine fellowships and those choosing other fellowships. Results: Of the 400 potential participants, 250 orthopaedic trainees (response rate, 63%) completed the survey (201 [80%] male and 49 [20%] female). Sports medicine was the most coveted specialty among trainees, with 70 (28%) participants opting for it as their career choice. The most prominent factors for the decision included disease prognosis and surgical outcomes (90%), personal interest (87%), experience during residency training (83%), type of surgical skills (81%), disease pathology and patient population (77%), expected workload and lifestyle (73%), role model or mentor (70%), and patient volume and variety of cases (67%). Significant differences compared with trainees who preferred other orthopaedic specialties included role model/mentor impact (70% vs 54%), expected rate of income (60% vs 47%), and private sector job opportunities (64% vs 45%) (P = .025, .034, and .020, respectively). Conclusion: Study findings indicated that a significant percentage of orthopaedic trainees in Saudi Arabia choose to specialize in sports medicine. Role model/mentorship, private sector job opportunities, and expected rate of income were the most influential when compared with the motivations of trainees not choosing sports medicine.