The Efficacy of Intercostal Nerve Block in the Management of Postoperative Pain After Costal Cartilage Harvest for Craniofacial Reconstruction Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Autologous costal cartilage harvest is a common procedure in craniofacial reconstruction due to its stability, dependability, and diversity. However, such a procedure is associated with severe donor-site pain postoperatively. Therefore, we aim through this study to compare the efficacy of intercostal nerve block in the management of postoperative pain in patients undergoing costal cartilage harvest for craniofacial reconstruction. METHOD: This systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The study systematically reviewed MEDLINE, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases without time-limitation. RESULTS: As a result of reviewing the literature, 33 articles were screened by full-text resulting in 14 articles which met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. However, only four high-quality RCT articles were included in the quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis). The findings of this study suggest that there is no significant difference in pain scores between ICNB and control groups at 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively, both at rest and with coughing. Therefore, both techniques are considered safe and effective. CONCLUSION: Our results show evidence of favorable outcome of preventive donor-site analgesia with ICNB for harvesting autologous costal cartilage in multiple studies. However, the overall outcomes were insignificant between the two arms. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Top 50 Highly Cited Publications in Facelift Surgery: A 50-Year Bibliometric Analysis Review.

INTRODUCTION: Facelift surgery, also known as rhytidectomy, is a commonly performed procedure to address aging-related changes in the face and neck. Over the years, its techniques and methodologies have evolved. This study aimed to provide a bibliometric analysis of the top 50 most cited publications related to facelift surgery over a fifty-year period (1973-2023). METHODS: The authors obtained data from the Web of Science Core Collection on July 15, 2023. Using a predefined search strategy, the most cited articles from 1973 to 2023 on facelift surgery were identified. The publications were analyzed for their type of study, journal of publication, geographic origin, and primary outcomes. Furthermore, the authorship gender distribution was assessed. RESULTS: The majority of the publications (34 out of 50) were published in the "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery" journal. The USA contributed to 72% of the research, followed by the UK, Mexico, Australia, and Germany. The primary outcomes varied from surgical techniques, anatomical studies, risk factors, patient-specific outcomes, and facial rejuvenation techniques, to comparative and historical progression of techniques. Notably, male authors dominated the field with 47 out of 50 papers having both a first and senior male author. CONCLUSION: Facelift surgery has seen substantial research development over the past fifty years. The USA has been at the forefront of this research, with a predominant focus on surgical techniques and anatomical studies. Male dominance in authorship indicates potential scope for increased gender diversity in this specialty. Annual updates are recommended for continued insights. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Autologous fat graft in cleft lip patients: a comprehensive systematic review of technique, outcomes, and complications.

Cleft lip is a common craniofacial anomaly and aesthetic obstacle. Different procedures, techniques, and steps are required for repair. These procedures may result in secondary abnormalities or volume deficiencies that can be managed by different methods such as autologous fat grafting. We aim through this study to identify the technique of autologous fat graft in cleft lip deformity and the patient characteristics for selecting this particular technique. This systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The study systematically reviewed MEDLINE, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases without time-limitation. A total of 14 articles published in the period between 2004 and 2022 were included, then patients in each study who did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded. A total of 519 patients who underwent autologous adipose tissue augmentation of cleft lip deformity were included and analyed. Autologous fat graft is found to be safe, effective in improving lip appearance as well as contour, and associated with high satisfaction rate among cleft lip patients. A selected patients with vermilion deficiency, whistle deformity, or overall lip volume deficiency is found to have a higher satisfaction rate. The most frequently reported complications were excess fullness, nodule formation, graft resorption, and nostril deformity.

Safety and efficacy of a laser refractive procedure in eyes with previous keratoplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Post-keratoplasty (KP) patients' visual acuity can be severely limited by ametropia. Irregular astigmatisms are frequently encountered in these patients and is commonly associated with high degrees of hyperopia or myopia. This systematic review investigates the safety and efficacy of laser refractive surgery for post KP vision correction. 31 studies with 683 participants (732 eyes) enrolled in this review. Mean astigmatism improved significantly (mean difference [MD] = -2.70, 95% CI, -3.13 to -2.28, P < .0001). As well as Mean spherical equivalent (MD = -3.35, 95% CI, -3.92 to -2.78, P < .0001). From 586 participants 5.8% lost 2 or more lines of corrected distance visual acuity after treatment. The proportion of eyes with 20/40 uncorrected distance visual acuity or better was reported and the percentage was 46.79% overall. Laser refractive procedures (laser in situ keratomileusis [LASIK] or photorefractive keratectomy [PRK] or transepithelial PRK) on eyes with corneal transplantation were found to be relatively safe and effective. Our systematic review shows there is improvement in all outcomes. Main adverse effects were haze for PRK and epithelial ingrowth for LASIK.

"Anesthesia for Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Release: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Local Versus Regional Versus General Anesthesia".

Background: Worldwide, carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral neuropathy due to compression. A minimally invasive endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) procedure is available to treat this condition. This study aims to identify and compare the different types of anesthesia in ECTR, particularly in terms of functional outcomes, patient satisfaction, and operative time. Methods: PRISMA guideline was used to design and conduct this systematic review. MEDLINE, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases were searched systematically from inception to May 2022. For the search, MeSH terms such as ECTR, general anesthesia, local anesthesia (LA), and regional anesthesia were used. Results: As a result of reviewing the literature, 198 publications were reviewed. After implanting our criteria, 12 studies were included. We included 14589 patients who underwent ECTR. LA has a higher satisfaction rate and a shorter operative time than general anesthesia. LA had a mean operative time of 20.1 min, compared to 45 min and 51 min for regional anesthesia and general anesthesia. The number of patients with postoperative ECTR surgical complications was 2.7% (95%CI). After ECTR with LA, 95% of patients are back to their daily routine within six months. Conclusion: All the reported methods were effective, with LA being the most commonly used. Furthermore, it showed a shorter operative time and a higher satisfaction rate than other types of anesthesia. Due to the heterogeneity of the data, we recommend future randomized controlled trials to highlight the differences in anesthesia types used in ETCR. Level of evidence: III, risk/prognostic study.

"Basal cell carcinoma of the hand: A systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence of recurrence".

Background: Hand basal cell carcinoma is a rare and complex disorder. Due to the hand's anatomical features, managing hand BCC is challenging. Therefore, we have conducted this systematic review to investigate various clinical characteristics, investigations, and treatment options related to hand BCC. Furthermore, a meta-analysis was used to provide pooled recurrence rates. Methods: We conducted this review per the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) guidelines. This study performed a systematic literature review in February 2022 using the following electronic databases: Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Key terms include hand basal cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, management, outcome, and recurrence. We evaluated articles according to predefined quality criteria. Results: The study included 9725 patients and 51 published articles. A total of 35 case reports, 2 case series, 1 prospective study, and the remaining retrospective studies were evaluated. An asymptomatic skin lesion was the main complaint. In 10 studies, Moh surgery was the most frequently used treatment method. In the seven studies included in the meta-analysis, the overall incidence rate of recurrence among the included patients was 1.49 cases per year. Conclusion: The optimal extent of surgical treatment is still controversial, though an early biopsy can help identify lesions at an early stage. It is the first study to provide occurrence rates based on a meta-analysis. Developing treatment guidelines for BCC of the hand will be the focus of future research.

The Effects of Glutamine Supplementation on Reducing Mortality and Morbidity among Burn Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Glutamine (GLN) has been proven to improve the prognosis of severely burned patients. GLN supplementation in critical illness has gained extreme popularity among researchers over the years, and its safety and efficacy are still under question. Therefore, we aim to study the role of GLN supplements in decreasing mortality, length of hospitalization (LOH), and infection in severely burned patients. PRISMA guidelines were used to design and conduct this systematic review. MEDLINE, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases were used to search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in January 2022. In order to assist in the search, MeSH terms such as burn injury, GLN, and RCT were used. As a result of reviewing the literature, 1112 publications were found. We included only 7 RCTs after implanting our inclusion criteria. There were 328 patients enrolled in the study, with 166 patients (50.61%) were allocated to GLN supplementation and 162 patients in the control groups (49.39%). The risk of infection was significantly lower among patients who received GLN supplementation than those in the control groups (RR = 0.41, 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.92, p = 0.030). The risk of death was significantly lower among GLN-receiving patients compared to non-GLN-receiving patients (RR = 0.09, 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.63, p = 0.016). GLN supplementation has been linked to lower hospital mortality and infection-related morbidity in burn patients. Furthermore, larger-scale and higher-quality studies are needed to assess whether there are any statistically and clinically significant changes.

A Systematic Literature Review of the Clinical Presentation, Management, and Outcome of Gestational Gigantomastia in the 21st Century.

BACKGROUND: Gestational gigantomastia (GG) is an uncommon pregnancy condition, and the underlying cause of GG has yet to be determined. Medical management and surgery are two treatment options for GG, and breast reduction or mastectomy with delayed reconstruction is the only available surgical option. We have conducted this systematic review to summarize and critically analyze all the GG data in the literature. METHODS: The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were adhered to in reporting this article. A systematic search was conducted in February 2022 for published case reports and case series on GG using the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases. The following keywords were used: macromastia, gestational gigantomastia, and gestational. RESULTS: A total of 639 articles were searched, and only 66 case reports published between 1962 and 2022 were included. The mean patient's age at presentation was 28.79 years old. The majority of the patients were in their first trimester (n = 23, 47%). The main complaint was rapid bilateral breast enlargement (n = 54, 80.59%). Bromocriptine was the most common medical management used (n = 19/35, 54.28%). Bilateral breast reduction was the most common surgery (n = 24/48, 50%). Most patients had uneventful recovery (n = 40/54, 74.07%). CONCLUSION: Gigantomastia is a difficult condition, in terms of its management. We have found that surgery is the gold-standard among all the cases reported; while Bromocriptine was the most commonly administered medical therapy. This systematic review provides a guideline for plastic surgeons to better facilitate their care of these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The management of perioperative pain in craniosynostosis repair: a systematic literature review of the current practices and guidelines for the future.

BACKGROUND: Craniosynostosis is a condition characterized by a premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures. The surgical repair of craniosynostosis causes significant pain for the child. A key focus of craniosynostosis repair is developing effective strategies to manage perioperative pain. This study aimed to review perioperative pain control strategies for craniosynostosis repair systematically. METHODS: Guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses were used in the design of this review. In May 2022, the following databases were used to conduct the literature search: MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. A search was performed using MeSH terms "craniosynostosis," "pain management," and "cranioplasty." RESULTS: The literature review yielded 718 publications. After applying our inclusion criteria, 17 articles were included, accounting for a total of 893 patients. During the postoperative period, most studies used multimodal analgesia, primarily opioids, and acetaminophen. In the postoperative period, oral ibuprofen was the most commonly used NSAID, rectal codeine, and acetaminophen were the most commonly used weak opioids, and continuous remifentanil infusion was the most commonly used potent opioid. CONCLUSION: The authors determined the best pain management options for pediatric patients undergoing cranioplasty by analyzing the most commonly used analgesics. A high-quality clinical trial comparing different types of analgesic combinations would be a valuable addition to the present literature.

Ocular Complications Post-Cosmetic Periocular Hyaluronic Acid Injections: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: With the global rise in the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers as a minimally invasive cosmetic procedure, significant adverse effects such as vascular compromise and blindness have become common. Hence, we present the first systematic review aimed to investigate ocular complications secondary to a facial HA injection and to understand the presentation, cause, management, and outcome of these complications. METHODS: The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to report this review. A systematic search was performed in July 2021 for published literature using the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases. The following terms were used: facial fillers, facial injections, hyaluronic acid, blindness, ophthalmoplegia, diplopia, ptosis, ophthalmic artery occlusion, posterior ciliary artery occlusion, and ocular ischemic syndrome. RESULTS: A total of 2496 publications were searched, and 34 articles published between January 2000 and July 2021 were included. Twenty-seven case reports and seven case series were evaluated. The nose was the most common site of injection (n = 25; 40.67%). Ocular pain was the most common initial symptom of ocular complications (n = 13, 22.41 %). The most common complication was vision loss (n = 17, 50%). The majority of patients received hyaluronidase, aspirin, and steroids. Regarding the outcome, 15 (45.45%) of the published studies showed no improvement in complications even after management. CONCLUSION: HA is gaining popularity in cosmetic applications. Post-HA ocular complications nearly always have an immediate onset. Proper knowledge of potential adverse events is crucial for clinicians to attempt to decrease complications and improve outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.