Evaluation of risk factors for recurrent renal stone formation among Saudi Arabian patients: Comparison with first renal stone episode.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the baseline characteristics, and risk factors of renal stone recurrence among Saudi Arabian patients after successful primary stone treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional comparative study, we reviewed the medical records of patients who presented consecutively with a first renal stone episode from 2015 to 2021 and were followed-up by mail questionnaire, telephone interviews, and/or outpatient clinic visit. We included patients who achieved stone-free status after primary treatment. Patients were divided into two groups: group I (patients with first episode renal stone) and group Ⅱ (patients who developed renal stone recurrence). The study outcomes were to compare the demographics of both groups and to evaluate the risk factors of renal stone recurrence after successful primary treatment. We used Student's t-test, Mann Whitney test or chi-square (x2) to compare variables between groups. Cox regression analyses were used to examine the predictors. RESULTS: We investigated 1260 participants (820 males and 440 females). Of this number, 877 (69.6%) didn't develop renal stone recurrence and 383 (30.4%) had recurrence. Primary treatments were percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), surgery and medical treatment in 22.5%, 34.7%, 26.5%, 10.3%, and 6%, respectively. After primary treatment, 970 (77%) and 1011 (80.2%) of patients didn't have either stone chemical analysis or metabolic work-up, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that male gender (OR: 1.686; 95% CI, 1.216-2.337), hypertension (OR: 2.342; 95% CI, 1.439-3.812), primary hyperparathyroidism (OR: 2.806; 95% CI, 1.510-5.215), low fluid intake (OR: 28.398; 95% CI, 18.158-44.403) and high daily protein intake (OR: 10.058; 95% CI, 6.400-15.807) were predictors of renal stone recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Male gender, hypertension, primary hyperparathyroidism, low fluid intake and high daily protein intake increase the risk of renal stone recurrence among Saudi Arabian patients.

Hypertension and Ovarian Cancer: A Case-Control Study in Saudi Arabia.

Background There is limited evidence that evaluates the association between hypertension and ovarian cancer. The study aims to investigate the association between ovarian cancer and hypertension, the difference in lipid profile, and the association between body mass index (BMI) and ovarian cancer. Methods We conducted a case-control study at King Abdelaziz Medical City (KAMC), oncology department. All Saudi female patients who were diagnosed with primary ovarian cancer admitted to the oncology department at KAMC from 2016 to 2019 were selected. The data were collected from medical records of patients of the KAMC by chart review using The Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs BESTCare database. Results A total of 137 Saudi female patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer attending to gynecology and oncology center in KAMC from 2016 to 2019 were included in this study. The mean age of participants was 57 in cases and 56 in controls with a mean BMI of 29.64 in cases and 31 in controls. There were 63 obese cases, therefore, the proportion of obesity was 46%. Approximately one-third of cases were overweight (28%) while one-fourth (26%) of them were underweight or normal weight. Roughly two-thirds of cases were hypertensive with an overall proportion of 66 % (95% confidence interval (CI) 58-74) while one-third of controls were hypertensive with an overall proportion of 32%. Cases were having significantly higher triglycerides (p=0.03) and lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (p=0.001) than controls. The significant variables were analyzed using logistic regression. It was found that hypertensive subjects were 10.06 times more likely (95% CI: 4.88-20.71) to be associated with the cases as compared to controls (p<0.001). Also, an increase in BMI was significantly associated with being a case with OR = 1.07 (95% CI: 1.02-1.12; p=0.004). Conclusion In conclusion, hypertension, elevated BMI, higher triglycerides, and lower HDL were significantly associated with ovarian cancer.

The beneficial effects of cinnamon among patients with metabolic diseases: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to summarize and conclude the clinical evidence regarding the use of cinnamon among patients with metabolic diseases. A comprehensive literature search without any limitation on language was conducted using the following bibliographical databases: ISI Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Search was conducted up to 23 January 2020. A total of 35 clinical trials were included for final analysis. Pooling of results showed a significant reducing effect of cinnamon on total cholesterol (TC) (weighted mean difference (WMD) = -11.67 mg/dL; P = 0.010), triglyceride (TG) (WMD = -16.27 mg/dL; P < 0.001), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) (WMD = -6.36 mg/dL; P < 0.001), serum glucose (WMD = -11.39 mg/dL; P < 0.001), serum insulin (WMD = -1.27 µIU/mL; P = 0.028), and waist circumstance (WC) (WMD = -1.68 cm; P = 0.016). These lowering effects on TG, TC, LDL-C, and serum glucose levels were robust in studies that used cinnamon supplementation dose ≤1.5 g. Also, our findings of the present meta-analysis showed that cinnamon supplementation could have favorable effects on high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C, WMD = 1.35; P = 0.038) as well as systolic (WMD = -3.95 mmHg; P = 0.018) and diastolic (WMD = -3.36; P = 0.001) blood pressure among patients with metabolic diseases. The present meta-analysis suggests that cinnamon might exert beneficial effects on various cardiometabolic risk factors among patients with metabolic diseases.