RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of post-operative gabapentin administration as an analgesic agent and its effect on narcotic use after orthopedic surgery in an outpatient sports medicine practice by comparing patients prior to and after initiating the routine use of gabapentin as part of a standardized post-operative pain medication regimen. We hypothesized that adding gabapentin to a multimodal post-operative pain regimen would decrease the number of requested pain medication refills and have no detrimental effect on Visual Analogue Scale and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation scores at these early post-operative visits. METHODS: All outpatient surgical patients, <90 years of age, undergoing outpatient orthopedic surgery by the study's senior author were included between 08/05/2021 and 02/22/2022. Patients were allowed 1 narcotic refill post-operatively and only in the first 3 weeks. The primary outcome was difference in percentage of patients who requested a narcotic refill within 3 weeks post-op. Two- and 6-week Visual Analogue Scale and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation scores, and baseline health and demographic data. T-tests were run on continuous variables, Chi-Square or Fisher's Exact Test were run on dichotomous variables, and Mann-Whitney U test was run on all other categorical variables. Statistical significance was set at P < .05 for all tests. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in narcotic refills at 3 weeks: 23 pre-gabapentin patients and 9 post-gabapentin patients (22.8% vs 9.0%, respectively: P = .006). There were no differences between 2- and 6-week Visual Analogue Scale and 2-week Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation scores. There was a significant difference in 6-week SANE between groups: mean difference = 6.4 (P = .027) though less than the established MCID. CONCLUSION: Addition of gabapentin to a post-operative multimodal pain regimen reduced the use of narcotics after orthopedic sports medicine surgeries while also providing equivalent pain control.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prehospital use of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) agents on the outcomes of early surgical fixation of a geriatric hip fracture. DESIGN: Case control study. SETTING: Two academic Level 1 trauma centers. INTERVENTION: Early (<48 h) surgical fixation of a geriatric proximal femur fracture. PATIENTS: Nineteen patients receiving Pradaxa (dabigatran), Eliquis (apixaban), or Xarelto (rivaroxaban) who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2015 and 74 control patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Time to surgery, transfusion rates, changes in hemoglobin levels, postoperative complications, readmission rates, and survival out to 1 year. RESULTS: There were no differences in transfusions, changes in hemoglobin levels, wound complications, or survival at any time point. Patients on DOAC had a longer delay to reach the operating room (28.9 h v 21.4 h P = 0.03) and were more likely to undergo readmission within 30 days (21% vs. 5.3% P = 0.05). No readmissions occurred for a complication of the surgical site, bleeding, or a venous thromboembolic event. CONCLUSIONS: Geriatric patients with hip fractures receiving DOAC before admission did not demonstrate worse outcomes with early surgical intervention. The increased readmission rate in this population seems attributable to the underlying cardiac conditions for which the patients were receiving anticoagulation. These results suggest that the delay recommended for patients using a DOAC before elective procedures may be unwarranted in the surgically urgent setting of a hip fracture. Additional studies will be necessary for appropriate meta-analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
