Far Lateral Craniotomy Closure Technique for Preservation of Suboccipital Musculature.

The far lateral approach is used for accessing pathology at the craniovertebral junction but can be complicated by postoperative suboccipital muscle atrophy. In addition to significant cosmetic deformity, this atrophy can lead to head and neck pain and potentially could contribute to cranio-cervical instability. To address this issue, the senior author began using a single myocutaneous flap without a muscle cuff and securing it directly to the bone using predrilled holes in the bone that resemble a chevron. The method is described and illustrated with an example case. Results from seven consecutive cases are reported since the technique was adopted. Muscle atrophy was measured by calculating area at the level of the occipital condyle and compared with the contralateral side. No significant differences were noted. In conclusion, we have found this to be an excellent closure technique and wanted to present our initial results for consideration by other skull base surgeons.

Petrous face meningiomas.

Cerebellopontine angle (CPA) meningiomas arise from the petrous face of the temporal bone, which forms the lateral boundary of the CPA. They can be categorized into anterior, middle, and posterior, based on their attachment in relation to the internal acoustic meatus. Each of them presents with their own characteristic clinical syndromes. Because of their close proximity to neurovascular structures, they pose a challenge during surgery. Microsurgery remains the primary treatment modality for large and symptomatic meningiomas. The retrosigmoid approach provides an ideal access for most of the tumors in this location. Radiosurgery is the primary modality of adjuvant therapy for residual, recurrent, and small lesions. Fully fractionated external beam radiotherapy can be used for larger, broader-based residual/recurrent tumors. Management of these complex lesions should include patient preferences and a team approach, including a skull base neurosurgeon, neurotologist, and radiation oncologist.

Single surgeon experience with minimally invasive supraorbital craniotomy versus bifrontal craniotomy for anterior skull base meningiomas.

BACKGROUND: Anterior skull base meningiomas (ASBMs) account for about 10% of meningiomas. Bifrontal craniotomy (BFC) represents the traditional transcranial approach to accessing meningiomas in these locations. Supraorbital craniotomy (SOC) provides a minimally invasive subfrontal corridor in select patients. Here, we present our series of ASBM accessed by SOC and BFC by a single surgeon to review decision-making and compare outcomes in both techniques. METHODS: Thirty-three patients were identified with ASBM. Age, tumor characteristics, presenting symptoms, postoperative complications, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Bifrontal and SOC were performed in 13 and 20 patients, respectively. Mean follow-up time was 98.4 months. Patients undergoing SOC had smaller tumor size, located farther from the posterior table of frontal sinus, had less peritumoral edema, and decreased length of stay compared to patients undergoing BFC. Extent of resection was slightly better with BFC (99.8%) compared to SOC (91.8%), although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Recurrence-free survival and rate of re-do surgeries were not different between two groups. BFC was associated with higher rates of postoperative encephalomalacia. CONCLUSION: SOC provides an excellent surgical option for ASBMs providing comparable extent of resection, minimal manipulation of brain, and excellent cosmetic outcomes for patients. The patient selection is key to maximize the benefits from this approach.