Guía de práctica clínica para el manejo del dolor en pacientes oncológicos de una red de clínicas privadas, Lima - Perú / Clinical practice guideline for pain management in cancer patients from a network of private clinics, Lima - Peru

Introducción: El presente artículo resume el proceso de elaboración de la Guía de Práctica Clínica (GPC) para el manejo de dolor en pacientes oncológicos. Este proceso se llevó a cabo con la participación de un equipo multidisciplinario de médicos asistenciales, metodólogos y diversos revisores externos (especialistas con dominio en la metodología y el tema). La priorización de preguntas PICO fue realizada por el Grupo Elaborador de la GPC (GEG), acordando trabajar cinco preguntas PICO. Para dar respuesta a las preguntas se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de GPC, revisiones sistemáticas y estudios primarios. Se utilizó la metodología GRADE y los lineamientos de la normativa nacional para la formulación de recomendaciones. Se formularon 12 recomendaciones (10 fuertes y 2 débiles), 5 puntos de buena práctica clínica y 4 cuadros consensuados sobre el manejo de dolor oncológico. Los temas que abarcaron las recomendaciones para el manejo de dolor en pacientes oncológicos fueron: intervención temprana de tratamiento, terapia analgésica en dolor leve a moderado y en dolor moderado a severo, dolor neuropático e intervenciones no farmacológicas.

Guía de Práctica Clínica para el Manejo del Dolor en pacientes Oncológicos de una Red de Clínicas Privadas, Lima - Perú / Clinical Practice Guide for Pain Management in Oncological Patients from a Network of Private Clinics, Lima - Peru

Introducción: El presente artículo resume el proceso de elaboración de la Guía de Práctica Clínica (GPC) para el manejo de dolor en pacientes oncológicos. Este proceso se llevó a cabo con la participación de un equipo multidisciplinario de médicos asistenciales, metodólogos y diversos revisores externos (especialistas con dominio en la metodología y el tema). La priorización de preguntas PICO fue realizada por el Grupo Elaborador de la GPC (GEG), acordando trabajar cinco preguntas PICO. Para dar respuesta a las preguntas se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de GPC, revisiones sistemáticas y estudios primarios. Se utilizó la metodología GRADE y los lineamientos de la normativa nacional para la formulación de recomendaciones. Se formularon 12 recomendaciones (10 fuertes y 2 débiles), 5 puntos de buena práctica clínica y 4 cuadros consensuados sobre el manejo de dolor oncológico. Los temas que abarcaron las recomendaciones para el manejo de dolor en pacientes oncológicos fueron: intervención temprana de tratamiento, terapia analgésica en dolor leve a moderado y en dolor moderado a severo, dolor neuropático e intervenciones no farmacológicas.

Background: The article summarizes the process of elaboration of the Clinical Practice Guide (CPG) for the management of cancer patients. The elaboration process was carried out with the participation of a multidisciplinary team of assisting physicians, methodologists and various external reviewers (specialists with mastery in the methodology and the subject). The prioritization of PICO questions was carried out by the GPC Elaboration Group (GEG), after which 05 PICO questions were concluded. To answer the questions, a systematic search of CPGs, systematic reviews and primary studies was carried out. The "GRADE" methodology and the guidelines of national regulations were used to formulate recommendations. Twelve recommendations were made (ten strong and two weak),5 points of good clinical practice,04 consensus tables on the management of cancer pain. The topics that covered the recommendations for pain management in cancer patients were: early treatment intervention, analgesic therapy in mild to moderate pain and moderate to severe pain, neuropathic pain and non-pharmacological interventions

Cyclophosphamide, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone as Initial Therapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in a Middle-Income Country: 7-Year Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: Major progress has occurred in multiple myeloma (MM) treatment in recent years, but this is not seen in low- and middle-income countries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the efficacy and safety of cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2 for 5 days, thalidomide 100 mg once daily, if tolerated, and dexamethasone 40 mg once weekly; in 28-day cycles) in patients with newly diagnosed MM treated at our institution between April 2008 and December 2012. Survival outcomes were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were found to meet the selection criteria. Median age was 56 years (27-78). Fifty-nine percent (n = 35) were male. International Staging System three was found in 24%. The median number of treatment cycles was 11 (range 4-12). After a median of 81-month follow-up (range 5-138 months), the overall response rate was 69.5%. The complete response and very good partial response were 5% and 32%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 35 months (95% CI, 18 to 41). The 3-year PFS was 47.4% (95% CI, 34.5 to 59.6) and 5-year PFS was 24.9% (95% CI, 14.4 to 36.9). The median of overall survival (OS) was 81 months (95% CI, 33 to not reached). The 3-year OS was 63.4% (95% CI, 49.2 to 74.6), and 5-year OS was 57.5% (95% CI, 43.2 to 69.4). The most common adverse event was neutropenia (grade 3 and 4, 30.5%). Out of 23 patients eligible for stem-cell transplantation, 10 (43.5%) proceeded with autologous transplantation. Treatment-related deaths occurred in four patients (6.7%). CONCLUSION: Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone achieves good response rates with tolerable toxicity, especially in patients age 65 years or younger representing a feasible approach for patients with MM in low-income health care settings.

Manejo multidisciplinario de la Neutropenia Febril: Consenso Institucional. Lima, Perú. / Multidisciplinary Management of Febrile Neutropenia: Consensus Statement. Lima, Peru

Introducción: Brindar recomendaciones basadas en la mejor evidencia científica disponible para el manejo multidisciplinario de la neutropenia febril. El desarrollo abarco las etapas: aprobación de la conformación del Grupo Elaborador (GE); búsqueda de GPC; análisis y síntesis de la evidencia que llevó al establecimiento de la recomendación de las GPC seleccionadas, diseño del documento consenso, revisión interna. Todas las fases fueron llevadas a cabo mediante reuniones de panel a través del uso de plataformas virtuales durante 03 meses. Se utilizó el sistema "GRADE" para establecer la fuerza y dirección de las recomendaciones. Las recomendaciones abarcan la prevención, el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la neutropenia febril en pacientes oncohematológicos. Se formularon 28 recomendaciones. Los temas abordados han sido relacionados a: correcta evaluación; diagnóstico oportuno, tratamiento antibiótico adecuado, vacunación contra influenza y neumococo, administración de factor estimulante de colonias y manejo especial en pacientes pediátricos para diagnóstico, tratamiento.

Background:To provide recommendations based on the best available scientific evidence for the multidisciplinary management of febrile neutropenia. The development included the stages: approval of the creation of the Working Group (WG); CPG search; analysis and synthesis of the evidence that led to establishing the recommendation of the selected CPGs, design of the consensus document, internal review. All phases were carried out through panel meetings using virtual platforms during 03 months. The "GRADE" system was used to establish the strength and direction of the recommendations. The recommendations cover the prevention, diagnosisandtreatmentoffebrileneutropeniain oncohematological patients. Twenty-eight recommendations were developed. The topics approached were: correct evaluation; timely diagnosis,adequateantibiotictreatment,vaccinationagainst influenza and pneumococcus, administration of colony-stimulating factor and special management of pediatric patients for diagnosis, treatment.

Diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer de mama HER2+: Guía de Práctica Clínica de la Sociedad Peruana de Cancerología / Diagnosis and treatment of HER2 + breast cancer: Clinical Practice Guide of the Peruvian Society of Cancerology

RESUMEN Introducción. En Perú, el cáncer de mama representa el tipo de cáncer más frecuente en mujeres y el sexto tipo de cáncer más letal en la población general. La sobreexpresión del receptor del factor de crecimiento epidérmico (HER2+) ocurre en 20% a 30% de los cánceres de mama, y se asocia con tumores más agresivos, con mayor recurrencia y mayor mortalidad. Objetivo. Elaborar un conjunto de recomendaciones basadas en evidencias para el diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer de mama HER2+, con la finalidad de contribuir a reducir la mortalidad, progresión de la enfermedad y mejorar la calidad de vida. Métodos. Se conformó un panel de especialistas clínicos y metodólogos, quienes identificaron preguntas clínicas relevantes sobre el diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer de mama HER2+. Se desarrolló una búsqueda sistemática de GPC en Medline (PubMed), y en organismos elaboradores y recopiladores. Para la formulación de recomendaciones, el panel de especialistas discutió la evidencia y elementos del contexto de implementación de la recomendación, siguiendo la metodología propuesta por el Ministerio de Salud del Perú. Resultados. Se priorizó nueve preguntas clínicas. Se formuló un total de 25 recomendaciones clínicas. Conclusiones. Se elaboró una GPC basada en evidencias, a través de un proceso sistemático, riguroso y transparente desarrollado por un equipo multidisciplinario.

ABSTRACT Introduction. In Peru, breast cancer represents the most common type of cancer in women and the sixth most lethal type of cancer in the general population. Overexpression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2 +) occurs in 20% to 30% of breast cancers, and is associated with more aggressive tumors, with greater recurrence and greater mortality. Objective. Prepare a set of evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of HER2 + breast cancer, in order to help reduce mortality, disease progression and improve quality of life. Methods. A panel of clinical specialists and methodologists was formed, who identified relevant clinical questions about the diagnosis and treatment of HER2 + breast cancer. A systematic search for CPGs was carried out in Medline (PubMed), and in developing and compiling agencies. For the formulation of recommendations, the panel of specialists discussed the evidence and elements of the context of implementation of the recommendation, following the methodology proposed by the Ministry of Health of Peru. Results. Nine clinical questions were prioritized. A total of 25 clinical recommendations were made. Conclusions. An evidence-based CPG was developed through a systematic, rigorous and transparent process developed by a multidisciplinary team.

Level of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and density of infiltrating immune cells in different malignancies.

Aim: To correlate levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) evaluated using the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group methodology, and both density of tumor-infiltrating immune cell and clinicopathological features in different malignancies. Methods: 209 pathological samples from gastric cancer, cervical cancer (CC), non-small-lung cancer, cutaneous melanoma (CM) and glioblastoma were tested for TIL in hematoxylin eosin, and density of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD20+, CD68+ and CD163+ cells by digital analysis. Results: TIL levels were higher in invasive margin compartments (IMC). TIL in IMC, intratumoral and stromal compartments predicted survival. CC and gastric cancer had higher TIL in intratumoral; CC and CM had higher TIL in stromal compartment and IMC. CM had the highest density of lymphocyte and macrophage populations. CD20 density was associated with survival in the whole series. Conclusion: Standardized evaluation of TIL levels may provide valuable prognostic information in a spectrum of different malignancies.

Implementation of Computerized Physician Order Entry for Chemotherapy: A Latin American Experience.

PURPOSE: We describe the implementation process of a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) for outpatient chemotherapy at a Latin American hospital, with the intent of providing other institutions with general guidance and insight through our experience. METHODS: In 2012, under the direction of the Department of Medicine of the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, a multidisciplinary team composed of oncologists, nurses, pharmacists, and informatics engineers was formed to develop software for a CPOE for chemotherapy within a preexistent homegrown electronic medical record system in various phases. This included mapping and redesigning processes in an entirely electronic format, integrating the needs of the user for the development of electronic order sets, developing a checkpoint and a warning system to minimize prescription errors, and finally, training all the staff in implementation of the system. RESULTS: A CPOE for outpatient chemotherapy was successfully implemented in 2016. We have successfully standardized 266 chemotherapy orders, including for both solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, on the basis of appropriate guidelines. The software is linked to laboratory results and allows entry of important details for the patient's safety, such as anthropometric information for an automatic dose calculation and ranges for safe prescription. In addition, it is linked to the nursing plan sheets. Finally, it is possible to assess and continuously monitor the complex process of chemotherapy prescription. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of implementation of a CPOE for chemotherapy in our region. The system was designed by a multidisciplinary team with its own resources. Our experience demonstrates the feasibility of computerizing the chemotherapy prescription process, constituting a tangible example for other institutions with potential impact on patient care.