Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Saudi Dent J ; 31(2): 236-241, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30983834

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The study was built around the objective of determining the variances in the gap and void formation around cemented prefabricated fiber posts with two different cementation materials and techniques with micro-computed tomography (µCT). METHODS: Standardized acrylic resin roots (N = 40) with prefabricated fiber posts (RelyX™ Fiber Post 3D) were split into four sets (n = 10) based on many types of cementation materials and techniques. In the first group, resin cement (RelyX™ Unicem) was inserted to the canals via root canal tips. In the second group, the same cement was injected, and a microbrush was used to distribute the cement inside the canal. In the third group, dual polymerizing resin cement (MultiCore® Flow) was injected into the canals by using root canal tips. In the fourth group, the same cement was injected, and a microbrush was used to distribute the cement inside the canal. The gap and void formation in the cement and the root canals was evaluated with µCT. IBM SPSS Statistics was used to perform the statistical evaluation, then the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of normality and Kruskal-Wallis H test to compare these variables with respect to the all groups significant difference (a = 0.05). RESULTS: The study outlined no difference of significance when evaluating the gap and void formation within the experimental groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: There was a certain amount of void and gap formation inside all of the tested specimens. However, no significant variances were found.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...