The surgical vascular anatomy of the minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody approach: a cadaveric and radiographic analysis.

PURPOSE: The minimally invasive (MI) lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) approach has become increasingly popular for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease. The neural anatomy of the lumbar plexus has been studied; however, the pertinent surgical vascular anatomy has not been examined in detail. The goal of this study is to examine the vascular structures that are relevant in relation to the MI-LLIF approach. METHODS: Anatomic dissection of the lumbar spines and associated vasculature was performed in three embalmed, adult cadavers. Right and left surgeon perspective views during LLIF were for a total of six approaches. During the dissection, all vascular elements were noted and photographed, and anatomical relationships to the vertebral bodies and disc spaces were analyzed. In addition, several axial and sagittal MRI images of the lumbar spine were analyzed to complement the cadaveric analysis. RESULTS: The aorta descends along the left anterior aspect of lumbar vertebra with an average distance of 2.1 cm (range 1.9-2.3 cm) to the center of each intervertebral disc. The vena cava descends along the right anterior aspect of lumbar vertebrates with average distance of 1.4 cm (range 1.3-1.6 cm) to the center of the intervertebral disc. Each vertebral body has two lumbar arteries (direct branches from the aorta); one exits to the left and one to the right side of the vertebral body. The lumbar arteries pass underneath the sympathetic trunk, run in the superior margin of the vertebral body and extend all the way across it, with average length of 3.8 cm (range 2.5-5 cm). The mean distance between the arteries and the inferior plate of the superior disc space is 4.2 mm (range 2-5 mm) and mean distance of 3.1 cm (range 2.8-3.8 cm) between two arteries in adjacent vertebrae. One of the cadavers had an expected normal anatomical variation where the left arteries at L3-L4 anastomosed dorsally of the vertebral bodies at the middle of the intervertebral disc. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the vascular anatomy of the lateral and anterior lumbar spine is paramount for successfully and safely executing the LLIF procedure. It is imperative to identify anatomical variations in lumbar arteries and veins with careful assessment of the preoperative imaging.

Peribrachiocephalic approaches to the anterior cervicothoracic spine.

This cadaveric study aims to reexamine the corridors to the anterior cervicothoracic junction, relative to the left brachiocephalic vein, and to present these working corridors as either supra- or infra-brachiocephalic. The anterior cervicothoracic junction incorporates the seventh cervical vertebrae through the fourth thoracic vertebrae (C7-T4) and involves critical anatomical structures. Operative approaches to this area are well described in the literature, with the predominant implementation of three surgical corridors. We used three embalmed, human, cadaveric specimens for this study. No pathology involving the cervicothoracic junction was noted. While dissecting, we tried to imitate the actual surgery. For each surgical step, photographs were taken, drawing attention to the critical structures and highlighting the different corridors to the spine relative to the left brachiocephalic vein. It is possible to access the cervicothoracic junction relative to the brachiocephalic vein from the left. The supra-brachiocephalic approach gives access to the C7-T4 vertebrae, whereas if T4-T5 is the goal, the infra-brachiocephalic approach may be utilized. In the supra-brachiocephalic approach, the brachiocephalic artery can be either medialized or lateralized as needed. A re-examination of the anterior cervicothoracic junction anatomy has allowed us to classify approaches relative to the left brachiocephalic vein. Identifying and understanding the approaches relative to this structure will assist in safe and effective spinal surgery in this area.