More challenging speech-perception tasks demonstrate binaural benefit in bilateral cochlear implant users.

OBJECTIVE: Preliminary studies show that bilateral cochlear implantation improves speech-recognition ability in many subjects; however, the magnitude of this improvement has been variable. The objective of our research was to explore means to better differentiate the binaural benefit that many patients who receive bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) describe. HYPOTHESIS: Binaural improvements in speech-perception performance will be consistently evident across patients when they are tested in more challenging listening situations. DESIGN: This was a prospective clinical study. Speech-perception performance was compared between the unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant conditions. Because the purpose was to investigate testing parameters that would demonstrate binaural benefit, word- and sentence-recognition tests were administered under several stimulation conditions: with and without noise and at three presentation levels. In addition, all subjects completed the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit as a measure of subjective benefit. Subjects were adult cochlear implant recipients. Three device manufacturers were represented (Advanced Bionics Corporation, Cochlear Americas, and the Med-El Corporation); three patients received simultaneous implantation, and the other four patients received sequential CIs. The setting was a comprehensive cochlear implant program/tertiary referral center. The main outcomes measures were speech-recognition scores in percent correct, mean score difference for unilateral versus bilateral conditions, and subjective benefit scores. RESULTS: The most significant improvements in binaural cochlear implant use were found when subjects were tested with sentence material presented at 60 dB SPL with a +8 dB signal-to-noise ratio. Six of seven subjects showed significant binaural improvement, with a mean improvement score of 12.43% (SD = 5.32). All subjects preferred the binaural listening condition. Measured improvements in quality of life were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary study findings suggest that significant cochlear implant binaural benefit in speech perception may be observed when testing in more difficult listening situations (i.e., lower presentation levels and in noise). According to the outcome of our study, testing the binaural benefit of CIs requires consideration of suitable test materials and stimulation parameters.

Speech recognition in quiet and noise in borderline cochlear implant candidates.

The present study 1) examined speech recognition at three intensity levels and in noise for adults with bilateral hearing loss who wore amplification and were referred for cochlear implant evaluation but did not meet current audiological criteria, and 2) compared their performance to cochlear implant recipients using current implant technology. When tested at 70 dB SPL, hearing aid subjects' word and sentence recognition scores were similar to or greater than the scores of cochlear implant recipients. Compared to their implanted peers, however, subjects' scores were significantly poorer at normal (60 dB SPL) and soft (50 dB SPL) presentation levels for words and at soft levels for sentences; detection thresholds were also significantly poorer at 1000 Hz and above. The assessment of candidates at louder-than-normal levels (i.e., 70 dB SPL) may not correctly portray their day-to-day communication struggles.

Gamma knife radiosurgery for acoustic neuromas performed by a neurotologist: early experiences and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess early outcomes after Gamma knife radiosurgery of acoustic neuromas and other skull base tumors. BACKGROUND: Gamma knife radiosurgery is one of the available methods to treat acoustic neuromas, in addition to micro-surgical resection. Neuro-otologists have long been associated with microsurgical resection of these tumors; however, the application of Gamma knife radiosurgery to the treatment of these tumors by neuro-otologists has not been previously described. SETTING: Acoustic Neuroma and Skull Base Surgery Program / Tertiary Referral Center. STUDY DESIGN/PATIENTS/INTERVENTION: Prospective clinical study of all patients treated by the senior author and our gamma knife team beginning in June 2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative MRI, audiometry, vestibular testing and facial nerve electromyography were completed. At six-month intervals postoperatively, audiometry, caloric testing and MRI were performed to determine thresholds and speech discrimination ability, vestibular function, and the size of the tumor. RESULTS: From June 2000 until March 2004, 38 patients were treated, and these included 33 acoustic neuromas, two meningiomas, one glomus jugulare tumor, and two facial neuromas. Greater than 36 month follow-up was available in 7 patients, > 24 months in 24, > 12 months in 31, and > 6 months in 34 patients. Statistically significant reduction in tumor size was seen over time, and tumor control was achieved in all but two patients. Various patterns of changes in auditory function, both in threshold and speech discrimination were observed in either positive or negative directions. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary experience with Gamma knife radiosurgery indicates that this treatment method represents another option for neuro-otologists to use in managing patients with skull base tumors.