Nasogastric decompression not associated with a reduction in surgery or bowel ischemia for acute small bowel obstruction.

OBJECTIVES: Small bowel obstructions (SBOs) occur 300,000 times annually leading to $1.3 billion in cost. Approximately 20% of patients require a laparotomy to manage the obstruction and either prevent or treat intestinal ischemia. Early management may play a role in reducing these complications. Nasogastric decompression is commonly used for early management. Our primary objective was to determine if NGD was associated with lower rates of surgery, bowel ischemia or length of stay. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 181 ED patients with SBO from 9/2013 to 9/2015 in order to determine if nasogastric decompression was associated with a reduction in rates of surgery, bowel ischemia or hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Our subject population was 46% female, median age of 60.27% of patients received surgery. Nasogastric decompression was used in 51% of patients. There was no association with a reduction in rates of surgery (p=0.20) or bowel resection (p=0.41) with patients receiving Nasogastric decompression, and no difference in baseline characteristics. Nasogastric decompression was associated with a two-day increase in hospital length of stay. Factors that were significantly associated with surgical exploration of SBO were: female (OR 2.32 (95% CI: 1.01-5.31)) and "definite SBO" on CT (OR 3.29 (95% CI: 1.18-9.20)). Abnormal vital signs, obstipation, and lab values were not predictors of surgery. CONCLUSION: Nasogastric decompression is not associated with a reduction in need for surgery or bowel resection, but is associated with a 2-day increase in median LOS. Women were more likely to receive surgery than men.

Internet Websites for Chest Pain Symptoms Demonstrate Highly Variable Content and Quality.

OBJECTIVE: Chest pain is a common symptom with causes that range from benign to serious. We assess the content and quality of websites about chest pain symptoms that describe its causes and when to seek care. METHODS: We used five search engines (Google, Bing, Yahoo, Ask, AOL) using the term "chest pain" and assessed the first 30 websites that resulted from each search. We excluded websites that were diagnosis-driven, intended for physicians, patient blogs, advertisements, news, or videos. For included websites, we assessed for the presence of content potentially useful to patients with chest pain symptoms; website quality with three instruments (DISCERN, HONcode, and JAMA benchmark criteria); readability using four validated scores, accessibility, usability, and reliability using the LIDA instrument; and popularity using the Alexa tool. RESULTS: In 27 included websites, 96 and 81% mentioned cardiac and noncardiac causes of chest pain, respectively, while 85% described when to seek emergency care. Only 51% of websites mentioned potential tests that might be used to diagnose symptoms, 22% described potential treatments, and 11% mentioned consequences if treatment is delayed or avoided. The median website DISCERN score was 23 (interquartile range [IQR] = 18-32) out of a possible 45 points, which can be interpreted as low to medium quality. A total of 44% of websites had HONcode certification, and only 11% fulfilled all four JAMA benchmark criteria. Average reading scores demonstrated that half of websites were above the eighth to ninth grade reading level. With LIDA, the average scores were "medium" for accessibility at 83% and usability at 59% and "low" for reliability at 43%. CONCLUSIONS: Many websites that provide health information for patients about chest pain symptoms are not reliable. There is highly variable content and quality, and the average website is difficult to read for patients with low health literacy.