Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Wien Klin Wochenschr ; 133(3-4): 131-136, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32189120

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To explore the medical care of individuals in rural areas during a public health awareness project on musculoskeletal disorders (MSD). METHODS: A tour bus was adapted to accommodate rheumatological consultations at widely accessible sites in 16 towns, providing individual medical advice with respect to MSD. The participating rheumatologists assessed the nature (e.g. inflammatory/non inflammatory), extent and duration of MSD and, where possible, made a tentative diagnosis and gave further advice on the course of action. In addition, age, sex and pre-existing care were recorded. All individuals were asked to assess their own severity of pain using a numeric ordinal scale from "no" (0) to "extreme" (10). RESULTS: A total of 647 individuals visited the service. Median current pain intensity was 5 (interquartile range [IQR] 3-6), mean 4.9 (standard deviation [SD] 2.3). Osteoarthritis was suspected in 381 clients (59.6%), inflammatory rheumatic disease in 247 (38.7%), and in 104 (16.3%) other diseases. 307 (50%) were treated by a GP, 95 (15.5%) were under orthopaedic care, 204 (33.2%) under rheumatological care and 81 (13.1%) under supervision of other specialists. 104 clients (17%) had never consulted a physician for their MSD symptoms before. 27 (4.2%) of all the clients had a newly detected inflammatory rheumatic disease and 62 (9.6%) patients with suspected inflammatory rheumatic disease were not under previous rheumatological care. CONCLUSION: The findings showed that there is still a lot of negligence in awareness and knowledge of rheumatic diseases, at least in rural areas.


Assuntos
Doenças Musculoesqueléticas , Doenças Reumáticas , Humanos , Saúde Pública , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Doenças Reumáticas/diagnóstico , Doenças Reumáticas/epidemiologia , Doenças Reumáticas/terapia
2.
BMJ Open ; 10(1): e033958, 2020 02 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32014877

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Previous research showed that depression is common in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the prevalence very much depends on different assessment tools and sociocultural differences, respectively. The main study aim and research question was to investigate the proportion of depressive symptoms in Austrian female patients with RA. SETTING: A nationwide multicentre study with seven secondary care centres all over Austria (hospital-based rheumatological outpatient clinics and private practices). PARTICIPANTS: 319 patients with RA and 306 healthy controls (HCO), all female Caucasians, were asked to complete a Beck's Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS). Patients and HCO were ≥18 years. Patients had to fulfil the 2010 classification criteria for RA. In addition, disease activity, disability, medication, drinking of alcoholic beverages, smoking and occupational status were evaluated. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: A BDI-FS cut-off value of ≥4, per definition, indicates the presence of a depressive symptomatology. RESULTS: The return rate of questionnaires was high: 235/319 (73.7%) in patients with RA and 180/306 (58.8%), ending up with 392 complete questionnaires from 223 patients with RA (69.9%) and 169 HCO (55.2%). The BDI-FS was significantly higher in patients with RA (median BDI-FS 2 (IQR 0-4) vs median 1 (IQR 0-2) in HCO, p<0.001). BDI-FS scores from ≥4, which by definition indicate depression, were found in 29.6% of patients with RA and 12.4% of HCO (p<0.001). Depressive symptoms were strongly associated with disease activity (Clinical Disease Activity Index, p<0.001) and disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire, p<0.005). No association of depressive symptoms with age, alcohol consumption, smoking, occupational status or use of medication was found. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of female patients with RA showed depressive symptoms. Depression was significantly higher in female patients with RA than in female HCO and was strongly associated with disease activity and disability. It would be of interest to address the same question in male participants.


Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide/epidemiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Áustria/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
J Rheumatol ; 46(1): 19-26, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30173156

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on impairing women's sexuality regarding motivation, activity, and satisfaction, and to assess the correlation of disease-related physical impairment within sexual functioning. METHODS: An anonymous survey among women with RA and healthy controls (HC) using standardized questionnaires, predominantly the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire-short form (CSFQ-14). In addition, disease activity, depression, and disability were evaluated. RESULTS: There were 319 questionnaires distributed to patients and 306 to HC. Of these, 235 patient questionnaires (73.7%) and 180 HC questionnaires (58.8%) were returned, of which 203 and 169 were completed, respectively. Of the patients with RA, 47.8% had a total CSFQ-14 score of ≤ 41, indicating female sexual dysfunction (FSD), as compared to 14.2% of HC (p < 0.0001). The median CSFQ-14 score was lower in patients with RA [42 points, interquartile range (IQR) 36-48] than in HC (49 points, IQR 44-54; p < 0.0001), resulting in an OR of 5.53 (95% CI 3.19-9.57; p < 0.0001). After adjustment for confounders, given a higher mean age of patients (55.2 ± 11.3 yrs) than HC (47.4 ± 11.8 yrs; p < 0.0001), the OR for FSD in patients with RA was still 3.04 (95% CI 1.61-5.75; p = 0.001). Neither the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index nor the Clinical Disease Activity Index was associated with FSD after adjustment. CONCLUSION: FSD apparently is highly prevalent in female patients with RA, affects all subdomains of sexual function, and is most likely underestimated in daily clinical practice. Of note, FSD could not be linked to disability or RA disease activity.


Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide/epidemiologia , Satisfação Pessoal , Qualidade de Vida , Disfunções Sexuais Fisiológicas/epidemiologia , Disfunções Sexuais Psicogênicas/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
4.
J Rheumatol ; 43(6): 1130-5, 2016 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27036387

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Waiting times for first appointments are a major obstacle to timely rheumatology care. To improve access, a cooperative of office-based rheumatologists established an immediate access network, offering brief initial assessments for patients with musculoskeletal problems. METHODS: Patients were assessed at presentation and followed up after 6 months. Data were analyzed regarding demographics, diagnostic accuracy, clinical variables such as pain levels, and care. RESULTS: There were 335 patients assessed in the 6 cooperating practices during dedicated office hours. There were 124 patients (38%) who had a symptom duration of < 3 months. For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), this proportion was 43% (70% for self-referred patients with RA). In the 325 patients available for reassessment after 6 months, initially suspected diagnoses were confirmed in 88%. Confirmation rates were 93% for RA (59 patients) and 84% for spondyloarthritis (SpA; 46 patients). At the followup examination, the visual analog scale for pain in patients with RA had significantly decreased from a median (interquartile range) of 70 (57.75-80) to 27.5 (20-42). For patients with SpA, the decrease was from 65 (50-79) to 30 (20-40). CONCLUSION: The Rapid Access Clinic resulted in a substantial improvement of access to rheumatology assessment. More than one-third of the patients presented < 3 months after symptom onset. Suspected diagnoses of inflammatory rheumatic diseases were confirmed in almost 90%. This initiative demonstrates the feasibility of a rapid access service and indicates high diagnostic accuracy in such a setting. In particular, with respect to early access, it compares favorably with similar hospital-based approaches.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Doenças Reumáticas/diagnóstico , Reumatologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor , Medição da Dor , Satisfação do Paciente , Projetos Piloto , Avaliação de Sintomas , Tempo para o Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
5.
PLoS One ; 11(1): e0146149, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26741702

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To measure the views of general practitioners (GPs) and rheumatologists in a nationwide evaluation, so as to optimise their cooperation in managing patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. METHODS: A questionnaire covering aspects of collaboration was sent, both by mail and/or by email, to all GPs and rheumatologists in Austria. Topics covered were (i) examinations and interventions to be performed before referral, (ii) the spectrum of diseases to be referred, and (iii) the role of GPs in follow-up and continuous management of patients. RESULTS: 1,229 GPs of the 4,016 GPs (31%) and 110 of the 180 rheumatologists (61%) responded to the questionnaire. In cases of suspected arthritis, 99% of the GPs and 92% of the rheumatologists recommended specific laboratory tests, and 92% and 70%, respectively, recommended X-rays of affected joints before referral. Rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis and connective tissue disease were unanimously seen as indications for referral to a rheumatologist. Only 12% of rheumatologists felt responsible for the treatment of hand osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia. 80% of GPs and 85% of rheumatologists were of the opinion that treatment with disease-modifying drugs should be initiated by a specialist. Subsequent drug prescription and administration by GPs was supported by a majority of GPs and rheumatologists, with a concomitant rheumatologist follow-up every three to six months. CONCLUSION: The considerable consensus between the two professional groups constitutes a solid base for future joint recommendations, with the aim to accelerate the diagnostic process and the initiation of adequate therapy.


Assuntos
Artrite Psoriásica/diagnóstico , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Fibromialgia/diagnóstico , Clínicos Gerais/psicologia , Relações Interprofissionais , Osteoartrite/diagnóstico , Reumatologia/métodos , Idoso , Artrite Psoriásica/diagnóstico por imagem , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Psoriásica/patologia , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico por imagem , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Reumatoide/patologia , Áustria , Gerenciamento Clínico , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Fibromialgia/diagnóstico por imagem , Fibromialgia/tratamento farmacológico , Fibromialgia/patologia , Clínicos Gerais/ética , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoartrite/diagnóstico por imagem , Osteoartrite/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoartrite/patologia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Radiografia , Reumatologia/ética , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...