Granzymes, IL-16, and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 increase during wildfire smoke exposure.

Background: Given the increasing prevalence of wildfires worldwide, understanding the effects of wildfire air pollutants on human health-particularly in specific immunologic pathways-is crucial. Exposure to air pollutants is associated with cardiorespiratory disease; however, immune and epithelial barrier alterations require further investigation. Objective: We sought to determine the impact of wildfire smoke exposure on the immune system and epithelial barriers by using proteomics and immune cell phenotyping. Methods: A San Francisco Bay area cohort (n = 15; age 30 ± 10 years) provided blood samples before (October 2019 to March 2020; air quality index = 37) and during (August 2020; air quality index = 80) a major wildfire. Exposure samples were collected 11 days (range, 10-12 days) after continuous exposure to wildfire smoke. We determined alterations in 506 proteins, including zonulin family peptide (ZFP); immune cell phenotypes by cytometry by time of flight (CyTOF); and their interrelationship using a correlation matrix. Results: Targeted proteomic analyses (n = 15) revealed a decrease of spondin-2 and an increase of granzymes A, B, and H, killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor 3DL1, IL-16, nibrin, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1, C1q TNF-related protein, fibroblast growth factor 19, and von Willebrand factor after 11 days' average continuous exposure to smoke from a large wildfire (P < .05). We also observed a large correlation cluster between immune regulation pathways (IL-16, granzymes A, B, and H, and killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor 3DL1), DNA repair [poly(ADP-ribose) 1, nibrin], and natural killer cells. We did not observe changes in ZFP levels suggesting a change in epithelial barriers. However, ZFP was associated with immune cell phenotypes (naive CD4+, TH2 cells). Conclusion: We observed functional changes in critical immune cells and their proteins during wildfire smoke exposure. Future studies in larger cohorts or in firefighters exposed to wildfire smoke should further assess immune changes and intervention targets.

Rhabdomyolysis: A Rare Presentation of Hashimoto Thyroiditis in an Adolescent Boy and Review of the Literature.

INTRODUCTION: Hypothyroidism-induced rhabdomyolysis without precipitating factors is extremely rare, particularly in pediatric patients. We describe a previously healthy adolescent boy who came to our institution with vague symptoms and was found to have rhabdomyolysis secondary to hypothyroidism due to Hashimoto thyroiditis. We also summarize previously published cases in children and adolescents. CASE PRESENTATION: A 16-year-old boy presented to the emergency department at Riley Hospital for Children with a 2-week history of bilateral eye and lip swelling, fatigue, and slowing of speech initially attributed to angioedema. His laboratory studies were significant for acute kidney injury secondary to rhabdomyolysis. Additional evaluation revealed profound primary hypothyroidism and positive TPO antibodies. Although his free T4 was undetectable, his TSH was only 32.2 mcU/mL. He received IV hydration and thyroid replacement, and his symptoms improved after several months of treatment. DISCUSSION: Rhabdomyolysis without any risk factors is very rare, especially in children. Our patient was not on any medications, had no family history of neuromuscular disorders, and no history of trauma, infection, or strenuous exercise. The reason behind the disproportionately mild elevation of TSH in the setting of an undetectable free T4 is unclear. CONCLUSION: It is important for clinicians to be aware that rhabdomyolysis may be a presenting sign of severe hypothyroidism, as delay in diagnosis and treatment can be detrimental.

Advances and novel developments in environmental influences on the development of atopic diseases.

Although genetic factors play a role in the etiology of atopic disease, the rapid increases in the prevalence of these diseases over the last few decades suggest that environmental, rather than genetic factors are the driving force behind the increasing prevalence. In modern societies, there is increased time spent indoors, use of antibiotics, and consumption of processed foods and decreased contact with farm animals and pets, which limit exposure to environmental allergens, infectious parasitic worms, and microbes. The lack of exposure to these factors is thought to prevent proper education and training of the immune system. Increased industrialization and urbanization have brought about increases in organic and inorganic pollutants. In addition, Caesarian birth, birth order, increased use of soaps and detergents, tobacco smoke exposure and psychosomatic factors are other factors that have been associated with increased rate of allergic diseases. Here, we review current knowledge on the environmental factors that have been shown to affect the development of allergic diseases and the recent developments in the field.

Epicutaneous sensitization in the development of food allergy: What is the evidence and how can this be prevented?

There is increasing evidence regarding the importance of allergic sensitization through the skin. In this review, we provide an overview of the atopic march and immune mechanism underlying the sensitization and effector phase of food allergy. We present experimental models and human data that support the concept of epicutaneous sensitization and how this forms one half of the dual-allergen exposure hypothesis. We discuss specific important elements in the skin (FLG and other skin barrier gene mutations, Langerhans cells, type 2 innate lymphoid cells, IL-33, TSLP) that have important roles in the development of allergic responses as well as the body of evidence on environmental allergen exposure and how this can sensitize an individual. Given the link between skin barrier impairment, atopic dermatitis, food allergy, allergic asthma, and allergic rhinitis, it is logical that restoring the skin barrier and prevention or treating atopic dermatitis would have beneficial effects on prevention of related allergic diseases, particularly food allergy. We present the experimental and human studies that have evaluated this approach and discuss various factors which may influence the success of these approaches, such as the type of emollient chosen for the intervention, the role of managing skin inflammation, and differences between primary and secondary prevention of atopic dermatitis to achieve the desired outcome.