Impact of Early Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation With Hippocampal Avoidance on Neurocognitive Function in Patients With Limited Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer. A Multicenter Phase 2 Trial (SAKK 15/12).

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to evaluate neurocognitive function (NCF) and clinical outcomes after early hippocampal avoidance (HA) prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in limited disease (LD) small cell lung cancer (SCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: In a phase 2 trial, patients with LD SCLC received HA-PCI concomitant with the second cycle of chemotherapy and thoracic radiation therapy. All patients underwent objective NCF testing at baseline, 6 weeks, and 6 and 12 months after HA-PCI. NCF tests included Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised, Controlled Oral Word Association, and Trail Making Tests A and B. The primary endpoint was NCF decline at 6 months after HA-PCI. We assumed ≤30% of patients with no NCF decline to be unpromising. Secondary endpoints included brain metastases-free survival (BMFS), overall survival (OS), and safety of the concomitant treatment. RESULTS: Among the 44 patients enrolled in the trial, 38 had evaluable NCF assessment at 6 months after HA-PCI. The proportion of evaluable patients showing no NCF decline at 6 and 12 months was 34.2% (90% confidence interval [CI], 21.6-48.8) and 48.5% (95% CI, 30.8-66.5), respectively. Median follow-up was 13.2 months (95% CI, 12.6-14.1). At 12 months, BMFS was 84.2% and OS was 87.7% (95% CI, 73.0-94.7). Four patients died of SCLC, 1 of respiratory failure, 1 of hemorrhage, and 1 for unknown reason. The most frequently reported grade ≥3 acute adverse events were anemia (21.4%), febrile neutropenia (19.1%), and fatigue (14.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients showing no NCF decline 6 and 12 months after early HA-PCI does not appear to be better than, but rather similar to, that observed in patients receiving sequential PCI without HA. Early HA-PCI in LD SCLC is feasible, with observation of promising BMFS and OS in this selected population.

TransitQA - A new method for transit dosimetry of Tomotherapy patients.

PURPOSE: TransitQA is an innovative method for Tomotherapy transit dosimetry using the on-board detector (OBD). Our previously published model for Tomotherapy treatment plan verification (AirQA) has been enhanced to take into account patient and couch transmission. AirQA estimates the OBD signal during irradiation with nothing in the beam path from the leaf control sinogram, allowing us to check whether the planned treatment is correctly delivered by the machine. TransitQA allows us to check the treatment delivery with the patient on the couch, potentially showing the effects of changes in the patient anatomy and delivery errors. METHODS: Patient and couch transmission have been added to the model using the OBD projections of pretreatment megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT). The difference in the energy spectra between the imaging and treatment beams has been corrected by an exponent from the MVCT projections consisting of the ratio of the mass attenuation coefficients. This exponent has been found to not vary significantly with the atomic number Z, allowing us to apply this procedure to heterogeneous media, such as patients. The attenuated OBD projections acquired during the treatment are compared to the model via a signed global γ-index analysis. The dose criterion was 5% of the 95th percentile of the dose distribution, and the distance to agreement (DTA) was 4 mm. RESULTS: Our method has been applied to a heterogeneous phantom with 98.1% of the points passing the γ-evaluation test, showing that the model can predict the attenuated OBD projection. The method has been applied to two representative patients throughout the whole treatment, highlighting variations in the signal transmission and γ-index. CONCLUSION: This paper establishes the proof-of-concept of transit dosimetry for all patients treated by Tomotherapy. Moreover, this method can be used as a surrogate for in vivo dosimetry.

Early closure of fistula using neo-adjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy in locally advanced anal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced anal cancer patients, especially with T4 disease and fistula, have a dismal prognosis. Neo-adjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy before standard chemoradiation has been shown to be promising in this setting. AIMS: We are reporting results from a larger patient population. METHODS: From 2005 to 2015, 25 consecutive patients with locally advanced anal cancer, 18 of them fistulised, received intra-arterial chemotherapy. RESULTS: Twenty-two of 25 patients (88%) had T4N0-3 disease and 3 (12%) T3N3. An objective tumour response was observed in 24 of 25 patients (96%): 24 partial responses and 1 with stable disease. Fistulas' complete closure was observed in 15 of 18 patients (83.3%). Following intra-arterial chemotherapy, 23 patients underwent chemoradiation. Twenty-one of 25 patients (84%) had a complete remission 6 months after treatment completion. Amongst 22 patients followed for 3 or more years, 18 of them (81%) are colostomy free at 3 years. Five-year overall survival is 75%. Most frequent grade 3-4 toxicity of IAC was neutropenia (25%). CONCLUSIONS: Neo-adjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy combined to chemoradiation resulted in a high rate of fistulas closure and long-term control of locally advanced anal cancer. This interesting approach in the treatment of fistulised anal cancer, needs a prospective study before being considered a new standard strategy.

Unusual Case of Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Cervical Metastasis of a Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report.

Brain and Head and neck metastases are rare in prostatic carcinoma patients. In this report we present a very uncommon case of the concomitant occurrence of a prostatic adenocarcinoma with neck metastases and an advanced laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma without neck metastases. The presence of cervical lymph node prostate adenocarcinoma metastasis concomitantly with a laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma is at least intriguing and may remind us of a rare event called "collision tumors". In this case we had the metastatization of 1 carcinoma to the site of the drainage of another carcinoma, but we never found the 2 histological types as close as requested to reach the definition of a collision tumor. This emphasizes the need of histological verification of different sites of recurrence when 2 or more primary cancers are known in a patient, particularly when the treatments of those primary cancers vary widely.