Advanced Autologous Lower Dermal Sling Technique for Immediate Breast Reconstruction Surgery in Small and Non-ptotic Breasts.

Breast reconstruction with an autologous lower dermal sling (ALDS) is an established one-stage procedure in patients with moderate to large ptotic breasts. However, this technique is difficult to perform in small and non/minimally ptotic breasts. We describe our experiences from a single institution about a novel Advanced Autologous Lower Dermal Sling (A-ALDS) technique for reconstruction in small breasts. We performed one-stage nipple/skin sparing mastectomies in 61 patients with immediate reconstruction either by Conventional Immediate Breast Reconstruction Surgery or A-ALDS technique. Mean age of study patients was 46.9 years. We observed significantly better cosmetic score and lower immediate complication rate vis-a-vis skin necrosis, implant loss with the A-ALDS technique (i.e., nil versus 3 in Conventional Immediate Breast Reconstruction Surgery (IBRS)). Forty patients completed 12-month follow-up. The PROMs - Patient Reported Outcome Measures (Breast-Q) revealed good to excellent scores for satisfaction with breast, cosmetic outcome, and psychosocial well-being in patients operated with both these techniques. However, sexual well-being was significantly better in the A-ALDS group. The A-ALDS is a novel, cost-effective, and safe technique for immediate one-stage implant-based reconstruction for small breasts. It provides a dermal barrier flap and hence, ensures less complications, excellent cosmetic results, and patient satisfaction. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13193-022-01524-8.

Extreme Oncoplastic Surgery for Multifocal/Multicentric and Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Breast conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiation therapy (RT) has become the preferred alternative to mastectomy for patients with early stage breast cancer (BC). Randomized trials have confirmed equivalent locoregional control and overall survival for BCS and mastectomy. Extreme Oncoplasty (EO) extends the indications of BCS for patients who would otherwise require mastectomy, ensuring better aesthetic outcomes and oncological safety. METHODS: BC patients with multifocal/multicentric (MF/MC) tumors, extensive DCIS, or large tumor >50mm underwent EO at our breast unit. Therapeutic reduction mammaplasty (TRM) with wise pattern preoperative markings and dual pedicle technique involving parenchymal rearrangement was used for oncoplastic reconstructions in majority of the cases followed by RT. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed using the validated Breast-Q questionnaire. RESULTS: Of the 39 patients in the study, 36 had unilateral and 3 had bilateral BC. Mean age was 47.2 years. Median tumor size was 75mm. 17 (43.6%) patients received NACT; none achieved a complete clinical response. 28 (71.8%) patients were administered to adjuvant chemotherapy. 33(84.6%) patients received RT to the breast with a median dose of 50Gy in 28 fractions and a boost dose of 10Gy in 5 fractions to the tumor bed. No major complications or local recurrences were observed. Excellent Breast-Q scores were observed in patients undergoing EO after 12 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: EO followed by RT results in acceptable local-regional control, low rate of complications, and high patient satisfaction. In selected patients, EO could provide a safe alternative for breast conservation surgery instead of mastectomy.