Survey of Anticoagulation Practices with the Impella Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device at High-Volume Centers.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize anticoagulation practices with the Impella percutaneous ventricular assist device (pVAD). BACKGROUND: Managing anticoagulation in patients being supported by the Impella pVAD is made challenging by several unique features of the device. These include the release of a dextrose-based purge solution containing unfractionated heparin (UFH), the need to concurrently administer systemic anticoagulation with intravenous UFH, and the lack of an alternative strategy in patients with contraindications to UFH. METHODS: To characterize anticoagulation practices with the Impella pVAD, we conducted a survey of centers in the United States performing a high volume of Impella cases, which we defined as > 1 per month. Centers were contacted via email or phone and individuals who agreed to participate were provided with a link to complete the survey online. The primary measures of interest were variations in practice across centers and variations from the manufacturer's recommendations. RESULTS: Practices varied considerably among respondents (65 of 182 centers, or 35.7%) and often diverged from manufacturer recommendations. Approximately half of centers (52.4%) reported using a UFH concentration of 50 units/mL in the purge solution, whereas most of the remaining centers (41.3%) reported using lower concentrations. Strategies for the initiation and adjustment of systemic therapy also varied, as did practices for routinely monitoring for hemolysis. Nearly one-fifth of centers (16.7%) had not developed an alternative strategy for the purge solution in patients with contraindications to UFH. Most centers (58.4%) reported using argatroban or bivalirudin in this scenario, a strategy that diverges from the manufacturer's recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Given these findings, studies to determine a systematic approach to anticoagulation with the Impella device are warranted.

One-year results from the first US-based enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERAS Cardiac) program.

OBJECTIVE: Our enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERAS Cardiac) program is an evidence-based interdisciplinary process, which has not previously been systematically applied to cardiac surgery in the United States. METHODS: The Knowledge-to-Action Framework synthesized evidence-based enhanced recovery interventions and implementation of a designated ERAS Cardiac program. Standardized processes included (1) preoperative patient education, (2) carbohydrate loading 2 hours before general anesthesia, (3) multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, (4) goal-directed perioperative insulin infusion, and (5) a rigorous bowel regimen. All cardiac anesthesiologists and surgeons agreed to follow the standardized pathway for adult cardiac surgery cases. The 1-year outcomes were compared between the 9 months pre- and post-ERAS Cardiac implementation using prospectively collected, retrospectively reviewed data. RESULTS: Comparing the pre- (N = 489) with the post- (N = 443) ERAS Cardiac groups, median postoperative length of stay was decreased from 7 to 6 days (P < .01). Total intensive care unit hours were decreased from a mean of 43 to 28 hours (P < .01). The incidence of gastrointestinal complications was 6.8% pre-ERAS versus 3.6% post-ERAS implementation (P < .05). Opioid use was reduced by a mean of 8 mg of morphine equivalents per patient in the first 24 hours postoperatively (P < .01). Reintubation rate and intensive care unit readmission rate were reduced by 1.2% and 1.5%, respectively (P = not significant). The incidence of hyperglycemic episodes was no different after ERAS Cardiac initiation. Patient satisfaction was 86.3% pre-ERAS versus 91.8% post-ERAS Cardiac implementation and work culture domain scores revealed increases in satisfaction across all measured indices, including patient focus, culture, and engagement. CONCLUSIONS: Initial clinical and survey data after the first year of a system-wide ERAS Cardiac program were associated with significantly improved perioperative outcomes. We believe this value-based approach to cardiac surgery can consistently result in earlier recovery, cost reductions, and increased patient/staff satisfaction.

Medication Management of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common form of valvular heart disease. A detailed diagnostic workup is necessary to promptly stage and classify disease severity to determine optimal management. Medical therapy and valvuloplasty are options that fail to delay or reverse disease progression. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is curative but has significant limitations for some patient populations. A newer option, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), has become more widely available to patients with intermediate- or high-operative risk. Periprocedural medication management is imperative for successful valve implantation and to minimize adverse events. Stroke remains one of the most common complications of TAVR and is associated with increased mortality. Thus, intra- and postprocedural antithrombotic therapy is required, although the regimen that best minimizes thromboembolic events and bleeding complications has yet to be defined. Patients undergoing TAVR with comorbid conditions requiring oral anticoagulation or individuals who develop subvalvular thromboses pose unique challenges. Antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy should be carefully balanced. This article summarizes key literature supporting the pharmacologic management of patients receiving TAVR.

Pharmacologic Considerations in the Management of Patients Receiving Left Ventricular Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices, including the intraaortic balloon pump, Impella, and TandemHeart, are often used for hemodynamic support in the setting of refractory cardiogenic shock. The thrombotic and bleeding complications associated with these devices is well recognized, and the Impella and TandemHeart devices have unique anticoagulation considerations that may influence patient outcomes. Both devices typically require use of a heparinized purge solution in combination with intravenous unfractionated heparin, thereby providing multiple sources of heparin exposure. Each device also has specific monitoring requirements and goal ranges. This review provides an overview of percutaneous MCS devices commonly used in the acute management of left ventricular failure, with an emphasis on pharmacologic considerations. We review recent evidence and guidelines and provide recommendations for appropriate use of anticoagulation during device support. Approaches to managing heparinized purge solutions, monitoring, and the utility of nonheparin anticoagulants are also provided because high-quality evidence in the literature is limited.

Management of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing interventional pulmonary procedures.

There has been great progress in antithrombotic therapy over the past several years. Its use has increased with the advent of novel anticoagulants, as these medications do not require frequent blood tests for monitoring. Antithrombotic therapy is aimed at reducing the risk of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, deep vein thrombosis, valvular heart disease and pulmonary embolism. These patients are often critically ill and frequently undergo urgent interventions requiring discontinuation of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy which can increase the risk of thrombosis; however, continuing these agents can lead to increased risk of haemorrhage.The purpose of this article is to summarise the literature surrounding the safety of using antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies in patients undergoing interventional pulmonary procedures.

Key articles and guidelines in the management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Significant numbers of patients undergo cardiac surgery worldwide each year. A large evidence base exists regarding the optimal pre-, intra-, and postoperative mediation management for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery, valve replacements or repairs, and mechanical circulatory support (MCS). Prevention and treatment of perioperative arrhythmias, perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis, prevention of thrombosis, and bleeding through proper management of perioperative antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies, and the use of pharmacotherapy to optimize both short- and long-term patient outcomes after cardiac surgery are the focus of this first compilation of guidelines and key articles in this patient population to be published in the Journal of Pharmacy Practice.