Performance comparison of six independent components analysis algorithms for fetal signal extraction from real fMCG data.

In this study we compare the performance of six independent components analysis (ICA) algorithms on 16 real fetal magnetocardiographic (fMCG) datasets for the application of extracting the fetal cardiac signal. We also compare the extraction results for real data with the results previously obtained for synthetic data. The six ICA algorithms are FastICA, CubICA, JADE, Infomax, MRMI-SIG and TDSEP. The results obtained using real fMCG data indicate that the FastICA method consistently outperforms the others in regard to separation quality and that the performance of an ICA method that uses temporal information suffers in the presence of noise. These two results confirm the previous results obtained using synthetic fMCG data. There were also two notable differences between the studies based on real and synthetic data. The differences are that all six ICA algorithms are independent of gestational age and sensor dimensionality for synthetic data, but depend on gestational age and sensor dimensionality for real data. It is possible to explain these differences by assuming that the number of point sources needed to completely explain the data is larger than the dimensionality used in the ICA extraction.

Fetal cardiac time intervals estimated on fetal magnetocardiograms: single cycle analysis versus average beat inspection.

Fetal cardiac time intervals (fCTI) are dependent on fetal growth and development, and may reveal useful information for fetuses affected by growth retardation, structural cardiac defects or long QT syndrome. Fetal cardiac signals with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of at least 15 dB were retrieved from fetal magnetocardiography (fMCG) datasets with a system based on independent component analysis (ICA). An automatic method was used to detect the onset and offset of the cardiac waves on single cardiac cycles of each signal, and the fCTI were quantified for each heartbeat; long rhythm strips were used to calculate average fCTI and their variability for single fetal cardiac signals. The aim of this work was to compare the outcomes of this system with the estimates of fCTI obtained with a classical method based on the visual inspection of averaged beats. No fCTI variability can be measured from averaged beats. A total of 25 fMCG datasets (fetal age from 22 to 37 weeks) were evaluated, and 1768 cardiac cycles were used to compute fCTI. The real differences between the values obtained with a single cycle analysis and visual inspection of averaged beats were very small for all fCTI. They were comparable with signal resolution (+/-1 ms) for QRS complex and QT interval, and always <5 ms for the PR interval, ST segment and T wave. The coefficients of determination between the fCTI estimated with the two methods ranged between 0.743 and 0.917. Conversely, inter-observer differences were larger, and the related coefficients of determination ranged between 0.463 and 0.807, assessing the high performance of the automated single cycle analysis, which is also rapid and unaffected by observer-dependent bias.

Beat-to-beat estimate of fetal cardiac time intervals using magnetocardiography: longitudinal charts of normality ranges and individual trends.

BACKGROUND: Fetal magnetocardiography (fMCG) records fetal cardiac electro-physiological activity during the second half of gestation. We aimed at assessing normality values, related variability, and trends of fetal cardiac time intervals (fCTI) evaluated longitudinally from beat-to-beat fMCG analysis in uncomplicated pregnancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The fMCG were recorded with multi-channel system in shielded room. FCTI were estimated on more than 2600 fetal cardiac cycles from 51 fMCG data sets of uncomplicated pregnancies. Independent component analysis (ICA) allowed reconstructing reliable fetal signals for beat-to-beat identification of fCTI (RR, P wave, PQ, PR, QT, QTc, QRS, ST, and T wave); intra-individual variability analysis and trends were calculated; reference longitudinal charts accounted for intra- and inter-individual variations and were compared with figures estimated on averaged signals. RESULTS: For each data set, fCTI were calculated beat-to-beat on rhythm strips of more than 50 beats (95% overall detection rate). FCTI values, variability, and trends were in good agreement with available reference figures; intervals related to P and T waves were, respectively, underestimated and overestimated with respect to those estimated on averaged signals or obtained by other research groups. Errors were reduced and individual trends could be drawn. CONCLUSIONS: ICA permitted the reconstruction of reliable time course of fetal cardiac signals and the beat-to-beat calculation of time intervals, and normality ranges, with smaller errors with respect to previous studies. The retrieval of fetal traces with clear morphology and the longitudinal character of the study allowed estimating individual trends and beat-to-beat characterization, impossible with cross-sectional studies on averaged beats.

Multichannel mapping of fetal magnetocardiogram in an unshielded hospital setting.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of unshielded in-hospital multichannel mapping of fetal magnetocardiogram (FMCG), with a 36-channel system for standard adult magnetocardiographic (MCG) recordings, and its reliability according to the recommended standards for FMCG. METHODS: FMCG was ambulatory mapped with a 36-channel MCG system, in six normal pregnancies at different gestational ages. MCG analysis included adaptive digital filtering of 50 Hz, signal averaging, reconstruction of magnetic field distribution (MFD) and source localization. Fixed Point Independent Component Analysis algorithm (FastICA) was used to reconstruct the FMCG, separating them from maternal contamination and noise. RESULTS: The quality of FMCG recorded after the 32nd gestational week and reconstructed with FastICA was close to FMCG obtained in shielded rooms, and good enough to measure cardiac intervals and heart rate variability parameters. In two cases, reconstruction of the MFD during the QRS allowed three-dimensional localization of ventricular sources. CONCLUSIONS: A first demonstration has been given that multichannel mapping of FMCG can be performed in unshielded clinical environments, with resolution good enough for contactless assessment of fetal cardiac electrophysiology. FastICA processing on unshielded FMCG, recorded after the 32nd week, provided beat-to-beat analysis and heart rate variability assessment. Further work is needed to improve signal reconstruction in early pregnancy.