RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Respiratory viral infections are common among pediatric transplant patients, with human rhinovirus (HRV) being the most frequent. In pediatric patients undergoing hemopoietic cell transplant (HCT), infection with HRV has been associated with progression to lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) and adverse outcomes. We describe the clinical presentation and outcomes of HRV infection in children undergoing HCT. METHODS: Single-center retrospective study. HCT recipients who were positive for HRV/EV (HRV+) or negative for any respiratory virus (VN) by BioFire® FilmArray® panel between October 2014 and December 2017, were included. Primary outcomes were progression to LRTI, ICU admission, all-cause mortality at 3 and 6 months, and respiratory event-related mortality at 6 months. RESULTS: 227 patients (160 allogeneic HCT) were included. Of all patients, 108/227 (47.6%) were HRV+. From all HRV+, 95/108 (88%) were symptomatic and 68/107 (63.6%) of the diagnosis were made pretransplant. The median age of HRV+ was significantly lower than VN patients (5 vs 10 years). Cough and rhinorrhea were more frequently observed in HRV+ (53.7 and 60% vs 19.8 and 22.8%, respectively). No differences were found between both groups pretransplant and overall in rates progression to LRTI, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, all-cause within 3 and 6 months, and mortality related with respiratory failure. No significant association was found between the severity of respiratory disease and the type of conditioning, type of transplant, or absolute lymphocyte count. CONCLUSIONS: HRV infection is frequently detected in HCT recipients but is not associated with severity of respiratory disease, need for intensive care unit or mortality, including those diagnosed before transplant, suggesting that delaying HCT in this scenario may not be needed. Multicenter larger studies are required to confirm these findings.
Assuntos
Infecções por Enterovirus , Enterovirus , Infecções por Picornaviridae , Infecções Respiratórias , Criança , Humanos , Transplante de Células/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rhinovirus , Pré-Escolar , LactenteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The role of SARS-CoV-2 viral load in predicting contagiousness, disease severity, transmissibility, and clinical decision-making continues to be an area of great interest. However, most studies have been in adults and have evaluated SARS-CoV-2 loads using cycle thresholds (Ct) values, which are not standardized preventing consistent interpretation critical to understanding clinical impact and utility. Here, a quantitative SARS-CoV-2 reverse-transcription digital PCR (RT-dPCR) assay normalized to WHO International Units was applied to children at risk of severe disease diagnosed with COVID-19 at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital between March 28, 2020, and January 31, 2022. METHODS: Demographic and clinical information from children, adolescents, and young adults treated at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital were abstracted from medical records. Respiratory samples underwent SARS-CoV-2 RNA quantitation by RT-dPCR targeting N1 and N2 genes, with sequencing to determine the genetic lineage of infecting virus. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-two patients aged 0-24 years (median 11 years old) were included during the study period. Most patients were infected by the omicron variant (43.72%), followed by ancestral strain (22.29%), delta (13.20%), and alpha (2.16%). Viral load at presentation ranged from 2.49 to 9.14 log10 IU/mL, and higher viral RNA loads were associated with symptoms (OR 1.32; CI 95% 1.16-1.49) and respiratory disease (OR 1.23; CI 95% 1.07-1.41). Viral load did not differ by SARS-CoV-2 variant, vaccination status, age, or baseline diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 RNA loads predict the presence of symptomatic and respiratory diseases. The use of standardized, quantitative methods is feasible, allows for replication, and comparisons across institutions, and has the potential to facilitate consensus quantitative thresholds for risk stratification and treatment.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Criança , Adulto Jovem , Humanos , Adolescente , SARS-CoV-2/genética , RNA Viral/genética , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Carga Viral , Teste para COVID-19RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite preventive measures, infections continue to pose significant risks to pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) recipients. The gut microbiota has been linked to clinical outcomes following adult allo-HCT. This study evaluated whether similar disruptions or differing microbiota patterns were associated with infection risk in pediatric allo-HCT. METHODS: In a prospective observational study, fecal samples were obtained from 74 children before conditioning and upon neutrophil recovery. Microbiome signatures identified through sequencing were examined for their associations with infections or acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in the first-year post-HCT using Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: Microbiome disruption in adults, did not predict infection risk in pediatric allo-HCT. Unique microbiota signatures were associated with different infections or aGVHD. A ratio of strict and facultative anaerobes (eg, Lachnoclostridium, Parabacteroides) prior to conditioning predicted bacteremia risk (Cox hazard ratio [HR], 3.89). A distinct ratio of oral (eg, Rothia, Veillonella) to intestinal anaerobes (eg, Anaerobutyricum, Romboutsia) at neutrophil recovery predicted likelihood of bacterial infections (Cox HR, 1.81) and viral enterocolitis (Cox HR, 1.96). CONCLUSIONS: Interactions between medical interventions, pediatric hosts, and microbial communities contribute to microbiota signatures that predict infections. Further multicenter study is necessary to validate the generalizability of these ratios as biomarkers.
Assuntos
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Adulto , Humanos , Criança , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Bactérias/genética , Fezes/microbiologiaRESUMO
Immunocompromised patients can have life-threatening adenoviral infection. Viral load in blood and stool is commonly used to guide antiviral therapy. We developed and evaluated a digital polymerase chain reaction assay to quantify human adenovirus in the respiratory tract and showed that higher peak load correlates with disseminated infection, mechanical ventilation, and death.
RESUMO
Although numerous studies have evaluated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection using cycle threshold (Ct) values as a surrogate of viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) load, few studies have used standardized, quantitative methods. We validated a quantitative SARS-CoV-2 digital polymerase chain reaction assay normalized to World Health Organization International Units and correlated viral RNA load with symptoms and disease severity.
RESUMO
Although mRNA vaccine efficacy against severe coronavirus disease 2019 remains high, variant emergence has prompted booster immunizations. However, the effects of repeated exposures to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigens on memory T cells are poorly understood. Here, we utilize major histocompatibility complex multimers with single-cell RNA sequencing to profile SARS-CoV-2-responsive T cells ex vivo from humans with one, two or three antigen exposures, including vaccination, primary infection and breakthrough infection. Exposure order determined the distribution between spike-specific and non-spike-specific responses, with vaccination after infection leading to expansion of spike-specific T cells and differentiation to CCR7-CD45RA+ effectors. In contrast, individuals after breakthrough infection mount vigorous non-spike-specific responses. Analysis of over 4,000 epitope-specific T cell antigen receptor (TCR) sequences demonstrates that all exposures elicit diverse repertoires characterized by shared TCR motifs, confirmed by monoclonal TCR characterization, with no evidence for repertoire narrowing from repeated exposure. Our findings suggest that breakthrough infections diversify the T cell memory repertoire and current vaccination protocols continue to expand and differentiate spike-specific memory.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Linfócitos T CD8-Positivos , Humanos , Fenótipo , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfócitos T/genética , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/genética , Vacinas Sintéticas , Vacinas de mRNARESUMO
BACKGROUND: Following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection or vaccination there is significant variability between individuals in protective antibody levels against SARS-CoV-2, and within individuals against different virus variants. However, host demographic or clinical characteristics that predict variability in cross-reactive antibody levels are not well-described. These data could inform clinicians, researchers, and policymakers on the populations most likely to require vaccine booster shots. METHODS: In an institutional review board-approved prospective observational cohort study of staff at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, we identified participants with plasma samples collected after SARS-CoV-2 infection, after mRNA vaccination, and after vaccination following infection, and quantitated immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to the spike receptor binding domain (RBD) from 5 important SARS-CoV-2 variants (Wuhan Hu-1, B.1.1.7, B.1.351, P.1, and B.1.617.2). We used regression models to identify factors that contributed to cross-reactive IgG against 1 or multiple viral variants. RESULTS: Following infection, a minority of the cohort generated cross-reactive antibodies, IgG antibodies that bound all tested variants. Those who did had increased disease severity, poor metabolic health, and were of a particular ancestry. Vaccination increased the levels of cross-reactive IgG levels in all populations, including immunocompromised, elderly, and persons with poor metabolic health. Younger people with a healthy weight mounted the highest responses. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide important new information on individual antibody responses to infection/vaccination that could inform clinicians on populations that may require follow-on immunization.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus , VacinaçãoRESUMO
SARS-CoV-2 infection causes diverse outcomes ranging from asymptomatic infection to respiratory distress and death. A major unresolved question is whether prior immunity to endemic, human common cold coronaviruses (hCCCoVs) impacts susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection or immunity following infection and vaccination. Therefore, we analyzed samples from the same individuals before and after SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination. We found hCCCoV antibody levels increase after SARS-CoV-2 exposure, demonstrating cross-reactivity. However, a case-control study indicates that baseline hCCCoV antibody levels are not associated with protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Rather, higher magnitudes of pre-existing betacoronavirus antibodies correlate with more SARS-CoV-2 antibodies following infection, an indicator of greater disease severity. Additionally, immunization with hCCCoV spike proteins before SARS-CoV-2 immunization impedes the generation of SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibodies in mice. Together, these data suggest that pre-existing hCCCoV antibodies hinder SARS-CoV-2 antibody-based immunity following infection and provide insight on how pre-existing coronavirus immunity impacts SARS-CoV-2 infection, which is critical considering emerging variants.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Formação de Anticorpos/imunologia , COVID-19/imunologia , Resfriado Comum/imunologia , Imunidade Humoral/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Animais , Infecções Assintomáticas , COVID-19/virologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Linhagem Celular , Resfriado Comum/virologia , Reações Cruzadas/imunologia , Feminino , Células HEK293 , Humanos , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/imunologiaRESUMO
Although mRNA vaccine efficacy against severe COVID-19 remains high, variant emergence and breakthrough infections have changed vaccine policy to include booster immunizations. However, the effect of diverse and repeated antigen exposures on SARS-CoV-2 memory T cells is poorly understood. Here, we utilize DNA-barcoded MHC-multimers combined with scRNAseq and scTCRseq to capture the ex vivo profile of SARS-CoV-2-responsive T cells within a cohort of individuals with one, two, or three antigen exposures, including vaccination, primary infection, and breakthrough infection. We found that the order of exposure determined the relative distribution between spike- and non-spike-specific responses, with vaccination after infection leading to further expansion of spike-specific T cells and differentiation to a CCR7-CD45RA+ effector phenotype. In contrast, individuals experiencing a breakthrough infection mount vigorous non-spike-specific responses. In-depth analysis of over 4,000 epitope-specific T cell receptor sequences demonstrates that all types of exposures elicit diverse repertoires characterized by shared, dominant TCR motifs, with no evidence for repertoire narrowing from repeated exposure. Our findings suggest that breakthrough infections diversify the T cell memory repertoire and that current vaccination protocols continue to expand and differentiate spike-specific memory responses.
RESUMO
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in late 2019 and has since caused a global pandemic resulting in millions of cases and deaths. Diagnostic tools and serological assays are critical for controlling the outbreak, especially assays designed to quantitate neutralizing antibody levels, considered the best correlate of protection. As vaccines become increasingly available, it is important to identify reliable methods for measuring neutralizing antibody responses that correlate with authentic virus neutralization but can be performed outside biosafety level 3 (BSL3) laboratories. While many neutralizing assays using pseudotyped virus have been developed, there have been few studies comparing the different assays to each other as surrogates for authentic virus neutralization. Here, we characterized three enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and three pseudotyped vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) neutralization assays and assessed their concordance with authentic virus neutralization. The most accurate assays for predicting authentic virus neutralization were luciferase- and secreted embryonic alkaline phosphatase (SEAP)-expressing pseudotyped virus neutralizations, followed by green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing pseudotyped virus neutralization, and then the ELISAs. IMPORTANCE The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is caused by infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Prior infection or vaccination can be detected by the presence of antibodies in the blood. Antibodies in the blood are also considered to be protective against future infections from the same virus. The "gold standard" assay for detecting protective antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 is neutralization of authentic SARS-CoV-2 virus. However, this assay can only be performed under highly restrictive biocontainment conditions. We therefore characterized six antibody-detecting assays for their correlation with authentic virus neutralization. The significance of our research is in outlining the advantages and disadvantages of the different assays and identifying the optimal surrogate assay for authentic virus neutralization. This will allow for more accurate assessments of protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2 following infection and vaccination.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Teste Sorológico para COVID-19/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Testes de Neutralização/métodos , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Adulto , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Domínios Proteicos/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/imunologia , Vírus da Estomatite Vesicular Indiana/imunologia , Vírus da Estomatite Vesicular New Jersey/imunologiaRESUMO
The efficacy of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines administered after COVID-19-specific monoclonal antibody is unknown, and "antibody interference" might hinder immune responses leading to vaccine failure. In an institutional review board-approved prospective study, we found that an individual who received mRNA COVID-19 vaccination <40 days after COVID-19-specific monoclonal antibody therapy for symptomatic COVID-19 had similar postvaccine antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) for 4 important SARS-CoV-2 variants (B.1, B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and P.1) as other participants who were also vaccinated following COVID-19. Vaccination against COVID-19 shortly after COVID-19-specific monoclonal antibody can boost and expand antibody protection, questioning the need to delay vaccination in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The St. Jude Tracking of Viral and Host Factors Associated with COVID-19 study; NCT04362995; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04362995.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although antibiotic prophylaxis with levofloxacin can reduce the risk of serious infection in immunocompromised patients, the potential contribution of prophylaxis to antibiotic resistance is a major drawback. We aimed to identify the effects of levofloxacin prophylaxis, given to paediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia to prevent infections during induction chemotherapy, on antibiotic resistance in gastrointestinal microbiota after completion of induction and consolidation therapy. METHODS: This prospective, single-centre (St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA) cohort study included children (≤18 years) receiving therapy for newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and who received either primary levofloxacin prophylaxis or no antibacterial prophylaxis (aside from Pneumocystis jirovecii prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) and provided at least two stool samples, including one after completion of induction therapy. We used metagenomic sequencing to identify bacterial genes that confer resistance to fluoroquinolones, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, or other antibiotics, and to identify point mutations in bacterial topoisomerases (gyrA, parC) that confer resistance to fluoroquinolones. We then used generalised linear mixed models to compare the prevalence and relative abundance of antibiotic resistance gene groups after completion of induction and consolidation therapy between participants who had received levofloxacin and those who received no prophylaxis. FINDINGS: Between Feb 1, 2012, and April 30, 2016, 118 stool samples (32 baseline, 49 after induction, and 37 after consolidation) were collected from 49 evaluable participants; of these participants, 31 (63%) received levofloxacin prophylaxis during induction therapy and 18 (37%) received no antibacterial prophylaxis. Over the course of induction therapy, there was an overall increase in the relative abundance of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance genes (estimated mean fold change 5·9, 95% CI 3·6-9·6; p<0·0001), which was not modified by levofloxacin prophylaxis (p=0·46). By contrast, the prevalence of topoisomerase point mutations increased over the course of induction therapy in levofloxacin recipients (mean prevalence 10·4% [95% CI 3·2-25·4] after induction therapy vs 3·7% [0·2-22·5] at baseline) but not other participants (0% vs 0%; p<0·0001). There was no significant difference between prophylaxis groups with respect to changes in aminoglycoside, ß-lactam, vancomycin, or multidrug resistance genes after completion of induction or consolidation therapy. INTERPRETATION: Analysing the gastrointestinal resistome can provide insights into the effects of antibiotics on the risk of antibiotic-resistant infections. In this study, antibiotic prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or levofloxacin during induction therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia appeared to increase the short-term and medium-term risk of colonisation with bacteria resistant to these antibiotics, but not to other drugs. More research is needed to determine the longer-term effects of antibacterial prophylaxis on colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria. FUNDING: Children's Infection Defense Center at St Jude Children's Research Hospital, American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities, and National Institutes of Health.
Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Levofloxacino/uso terapêutico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fluoroquinolone antibiotics are frequently utilized in pediatric oncology patients as prophylaxis or step-down therapy following broad spectrum beta-lactam therapy for febrile neutropenia. Concerns regarding neurotoxicity limit the use of these agents. No studies have evaluated the association between fluoroquinolone use and neurotoxicity in pediatric oncology patients receiving other neurotoxic agents such as vincristine. METHODS: An observational cohort study comprising patients aged 0-18 at diagnosis enrolled on a prospective study for treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) at a pediatric comprehensive cancer center between October 2007 and November 2018. Data for neuropathic pain and sensory or motor neuropathy were collected prospectively, and a Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate associations between administration of fluoroquinolone antibiotics during induction therapy and subsequent development of vincristine-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (VIPN). RESULTS: A total of 598 participants were enrolled, including 338 (57%) who received fluoroquinolones during induction therapy; of these 470 (79%) were diagnosed with VIPN and 139 (23%) were diagnosed with high-grade (Grade 3+) VIPN. On unadjusted analyses, and analyses adjusted for age and race, there was no evidence of an association between fluoroquinolone exposure and subsequent VIPN (hazard ratio [HR] 0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.04, P = .08) or high-grade VIPN (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.4-2.2, P = .87). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this observational study do not show an association between exposure to fluoroquinolone antibiotics during induction therapy for ALL and subsequent development of vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathies, and suggest that a large increase in VIPN is unlikely.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Fluoroquinolonas/administração & dosagem , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/etiologia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamento farmacológico , Vincristina/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antibioticoprofilaxia/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Fluoroquinolonas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Indução/efeitos adversos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Neurônios Motores/efeitos dos fármacos , Neuralgia/induzido quimicamente , Neuralgia/fisiopatologia , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/diagnóstico , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Células Receptoras Sensoriais/efeitos dos fármacos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Vincristina/administração & dosagemRESUMO
Importance: Bloodstream infection (BSI) is a common, life-threatening complication of treatment for cancer. Predicting BSI before onset of clinical symptoms would enable preemptive therapy, but there is no reliable screening test. Objective: To estimate sensitivity and specificity of plasma microbial cell-free DNA sequencing (mcfDNA-seq) for predicting BSI in patients at high risk of life-threatening infection. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective pilot cohort study of mcfDNA-seq for predicting BSI in pediatric patients (<25 years of age) with relapsed or refractory cancers at St Jude Children's Research Hospital, a specialist quaternary pediatric hematology-oncology referral center. Remnant clinical blood samples were collected during chemotherapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation. Samples collected during the 7 days before and at onset of BSI episodes, along with negative control samples from study participants, underwent blinded testing using a mcfDNA-seq test in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments/College of American Pathologists-approved laboratory. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were sensitivity of mcfDNA-seq for detecting a BSI pathogen during the 3 days before BSI onset and specificity of mcfDNA-seq in the absence of fever or infection in the preceding or subsequent 7 days. Results: Between August 9, 2017, and June 4, 2018, 47 participants (27 [57%] male; median age [IQR], 10 [5-14] years) were enrolled; 19 BSI episodes occurred in 12 participants, and predictive samples were available for 16 episodes, including 15 bacterial BSI episodes. In the 3 days before the onset of infection, predictive sensitivity of mcfDNA-seq was 75% for all BSIs (12 of 16; 95% CI, 51%-90%) and 80% (12 of 15; 95% CI, 55%-93%) for bacterial BSIs. The specificity of mcfDNA-seq, evaluated on 33 negative control samples from enrolled participants, was 82% (27 of 33; 95% CI, 66%-91%) for any bacterial or fungal organism and 91% (30 of 33; 95% CI, 76%-97%) for any common BSI pathogen, and the concentration of pathogen DNA was lower in control than predictive samples. Conclusions and Relevance: A clinically relevant pathogen can be identified by mcfDNA-seq days before the onset of BSI in a majority of episodes, potentially enabling preemptive treatment. Clinical application appears feasible pending further study. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03226158.
Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/sangue , Ácidos Nucleicos Livres/sangue , Neoplasias/sangue , Sepse/sangue , Adolescente , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/complicações , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/patologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/microbiologia , Neoplasias/patologia , Sepse/complicações , Sepse/microbiologia , Sepse/patologia , Análise de Sequência de DNARESUMO
BACKGROUND: Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) affect about 25% of children with cancer, and treatment failure is common. Adjunctive ethanol lock therapy might prevent treatment failure but high-quality evidence is scarce. We evaluated ethanol lock therapy as treatment and secondary prophylaxis for CLABSI in children with cancer or haematological disorders. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled superiority trial, with two interim futility and efficacy analyses (done when the first 46 and 92 evaluable participants completed study requirements), was done at two paediatric hospitals in the USA and Australia. Patients aged 6 months to 24 years, inclusive, with cancer or a haematological disorder and new CLABSI were eligible. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either ethanol lock therapy (70% ethanol) or placebo (heparinised saline) for 2-4 h per lumen daily for 5 days (treatment phase), then for up to 3 non-consecutive days per week for 24 weeks (prophylaxis phase). The primary composite outcome was treatment failure, consisting of attributable catheter removal or death, new or persistent (>72 h) infection, or additional lock therapy during the treatment phase, and recurrent CLABSI during the prophylaxis phase. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01472965. FINDINGS: 94 evaluable participants were enrolled between Dec 14, 2011, and Sept 12, 2016, of whom 48 received ethanol lock therapy and 46 received placebo. The study met futility criteria at the second interim analysis. Treatment failure was similar with ethanol lock therapy (21 [44%] of 48) and placebo (20 [43%] of 46; relative risk [RR] 1·0, 95% CI 0·6-1·6; p=0·98). Some adverse events, including infusion reactions and catheter occlusion, were more frequent in the ethanol lock therapy group than in the placebo group. Catheter occlusion requiring thrombolytic therapy was more common with ethanol lock therapy (28 [58%] of 48) than with placebo (15 [33%] of 46; RR 1·8, 95% CI 1·1-2·9; p=0·012). Discontinuation of lock therapy because of adverse effects or patient request occurred in a similar proportion of participants in the ethanol lock therapy (nine [19%] of 48) and placebo groups (ten [22%] of 46; p=0·72). INTERPRETATION: Ethanol lock therapy did not prevent CLABSI treatment failure and it increased catheter occlusion. Routine ethanol lock therapy for treatment or secondary prophylaxis is not recommended in this population. FUNDING: American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities to St Jude Children's Research Hospital and an Australian Government Research Training Scholarship.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Etanol/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias/terapia , Adolescente , Austrália , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Bacteriemia/prevenção & controle , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Prevenção Secundária , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Approaches to improve the immune response of immunocompromised patients to influenza vaccination are needed. METHODS: Children and young adults (3-21 years) with cancer or HIV infection were randomized to receive 2 doses of high-dose (HD) trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) or of standard-dose (SD) TIV. Hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) antibody titers were measured against H1, H3, and B antigens after each dose and 9 months later. Seroconversion was defined as ≥4-fold rise in HAI titer comparing pre- and post-vaccine sera. Seroprotection was defined as a post-vaccine HAI titer ≥1:40. Reactogenicity events (RE) were solicited using a structured questionnaire 7 and 14 days after each dose of vaccine, and adverse events by medical record review for 21 days after each dose of vaccine. RESULTS: Eighty-five participants were enrolled in the study; 27 with leukemia, 17 with solid tumor (ST), and 41 with HIV. Recipients of HD TIV had significantly greater fold increase in HAI titers to B antigen in leukemia group and to H1 antigen in ST group compared to SD TIV recipients. This increase was not documented in HIV group. There were no differences in seroconversion or seroprotection between HD TIV and SD TIV in all groups. There was no difference in the percentage of solicited RE in recipients of HD TIV (54% after dose 1 and 38% after dose 2) compared to SD TIV (40% after dose 1 and 20% after dose 2, p=0.27 and 0.09 after dose 1 and 2, respectively). CONCLUSION: HD TIV was more immunogenic than SD TIV in children and young adults with leukemia or ST, but not with HIV. HD TIV was safe and well-tolerated in children and young adults with leukemia, ST, or HIV.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Influenza/uso terapêutico , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias/imunologia , Adolescente , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Testes de Inibição da Hemaglutinação , Humanos , Imunização Secundária , Leucemia/imunologia , Masculino , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Long-term central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential to modern pediatric oncology practice, but central line-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) is a frequent and important complication. CVC salvage is often attempted but treatment failure is common due to persistent infection, delayed catheter removal, or subsequent relapse of infection, which can be associated with significant morbidity and cost. Adjunctive antibiotic lock therapy (ALT) has been proposed to reduce the risk of treatment failure, but insufficient data are available to confirm efficacy of this intervention. PROCEDURE: We undertook a retrospective matched cohort study of ALT use for treatment of CRBSI in pediatric hematology/oncology patients at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital between 2006 and 2012. RESULTS: Thirty-eight eligible episodes of CRBSI treated with adjunctive ALT were identified and compared to 73 episodes treated with standard therapy (ST) alone, matched by catheter-type and organism. Overall, treatment failure was similar between ALT and ST groups (50.0 vs. 38.4%; P = 0.24), but the timing was different; in the ALT cohort, immediate CVC removal was less common (0.0 vs. 12.3%; P = 0.03) but delayed removal (4-13 days) and relapse of infection was more common (50.0 vs. 24.7%; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study was unable to identify any benefit of adjunctive ALT in pediatric oncology patients with CRBSI. The available evidence does not support routine ALT use, and well-conducted prospective studies are needed.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/tratamento farmacológico , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/microbiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pediatria/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccination is recommended for immunocompromised patients. METHODS: Children (6 months to 21 years) with cancer, HIV infection, or sickle cell disease (SCD) received 1 or 2 doses of pandemic 2009 H1N1 monovalent influenza vaccine (H1N1 MIV). Safety and tolerability, hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and microneutralization (MN) antibody titers were measured against 2009 H1N1 influenza A virus after each dose. Seroprotection (SP) and seroconversion (SC) rates were determined. RESULTS: 103 participants were enrolled and 99 were evaluable (39 with HIV, 37 with cancer and 23 with SCD). Mean age (±SD) was 7.9 (±5.4) years for cancer participants, 18.0 (±3.5) for HIV, and 13.3 (±4.2) for SCD. 54% were males; 65% black; and 96% had received seasonal influenza vaccine. HIV-infected participants had a median CD4 count of 625 cells/mm(3) (range, 140-1260). 46% had an undetectable HIV viral load and 41% were perinatally infected. No participant had vaccine-related serious adverse events. None developed influenza A proven illness during the 6 months after the vaccine. Local injection reactions were reported in 29% and systemic reactions in 42% after the first dose of vaccine. SC and SP were achieved after the last dose in 48% and 52%, respectively, of participants with leukemia or lymphoma, 50% and 75% of participants with solid tumors, 63% and 92% of HIV-infected participants, and 74% and 100% of participants with SCD. CONCLUSION: H1N1 MIV was safe and well tolerated. H1N1 MIV resulted in an adequate immune response in children with SCD. It was only modestly immunogenic in cancer or HIV participants.
Assuntos
Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/métodos , Adolescente , Anemia Falciforme/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/imunologia , Testes de Inibição da Hemaglutinação , Humanos , Lactente , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Neoplasias/imunologia , Testes de Neutralização , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The safety and immunogenicity of live, attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) has not been compared to that of the standard trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV) in children with cancer. METHODS: Randomized study of LAIV versus TIV in children with cancer, age 2-21 years, vaccinated according to recommendations based on age and prior vaccination. Data on reactogenicity and other adverse events and blood and nasal swab samples were obtained following vaccination. RESULTS: Fifty-five eligible subjects (mean age, 10.4 years) received vaccine (28 LAIV/27 TIV). Both vaccines were well tolerated. Rhinorrhea reported within 10 days of vaccination was similar in both groups (36% LAIV vs 33% TIV, P > .999). Ten LAIV recipients shed virus; the latest viral shedding was detected 7 days after vaccination. Immunogenicity data were available for 52 subjects, or 26 in each group. TIV induced significantly higher postvaccination geometric mean titers against influenza A viruses (P < .001), greater seroprotection against influenza A/H1N1 (P = .01), and greater seroconversion against A/H3N2 (P = .004), compared with LAIV. No differences after vaccination were observed against influenza B viruses. CONCLUSIONS: As expected, serum antibody response against influenza A strains were greater with TIV than with LAIV in children with cancer. Both vaccines were well tolerated, and prolonged viral shedding after LAIV was not detected. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00906750.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Vírus da Influenza A/imunologia , Vírus da Influenza B/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Neoplasias/imunologia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Testes de Inibição da Hemaglutinação , Humanos , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Vacinas Atenuadas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Atenuadas/imunologia , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/efeitos adversos , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/imunologia , Eliminação de Partículas Virais , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND. The world is facing a novel H1N1 influenza pandemic. A pandemic scare with a similar influenza virus in 1976 resulted in the vaccination of nearly 45 million persons. We hypothesized that prior receipt of the 1976 "swine flu" vaccine would enhance immune responses to the 2009 novel H1N1 influenza strain. METHODS. A prospective, volunteer sample of employees aged > or = 55 years at a children's cancer hospital in August 2009 was assessed for antibody responses to the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus and the 2008-2009 seasonal H1N1 influenza virus. RESULTS. Antibody responses by hemagglutination-inhibition assay were high against both the seasonal influenza virus (89.7% had a titer considered seroprotective) and pandemic H1N1 influenza virus (88.8% had a seroprotective titer). These antibodies were effective at neutralizing the seasonal H1N1 influenza virus in 68.1% of participants (titer > or = 40), but only 18.1% had detectable neutralizing titers against the pandemic H1N1 influenza virus. Of 116 participants, 46 (39.7%) received the 1976 "swine flu" vaccine. Receipt of this vaccine significantly enhanced neutralization responses; 8 (17.4%) of 46 vaccine recipients had titers > or = 160, compared with only 3 (4.3%) of 70 who did not receive the vaccine (P = .018 by chi(2) test). CONCLUSIONS. In this cohort, persons aged > or = 55 years had evidence of robust immunity to the 2008-2009 seasonal H1N1 influenza virus. These antibodies were cross-reactive but nonneutralizing against the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza strain. Receipt of a vaccine to a related virus significantly enhanced the neutralization capacity of these responses, suggesting homologous vaccination against the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus would have a similar effect.