Maternal serum fructosamine levels and stillbirth: a case-control study of the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between maternal fructosamine levels at the time of delivery and stillbirth. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a case-control study. SETTING: Multicentre study of five geographic catchment areas in the USA. POPULATION: All singleton stillbirths with known diabetes status and fructosamine measurement, and representative live birth controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fructosamine levels in stillbirths and live births among groups were adjusted for potential confounding factors, including diabetes. Optimal thresholds of fructosamine to discriminate stillbirth and live birth. RESULTS: A total of 529 women with a stillbirth and 1499 women with a live birth were included in the analysis. Mean fructosamine levels were significantly higher in women with a stillbirth than in women with a live birth after adjustment (177 ± 3.05 versus 165 ± 2.89 µmol/L, P < 0.001). The difference in fructosamine levels between stillbirths and live births was greater among women with diabetes (194 ± 8.54 versus 162 ± 3.21 µmol/L), compared with women without diabetes (171 ± 2.50 versus 162 ± 2.56 µmol/L). The area under the curve (AUC) for fructosamine level and stillbirth was 0.634 (0.605-0.663) overall, 0.713 (0.624-0.802) with diabetes and 0.625 (0.595-0.656) with no diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal fructosamine levels at the time of delivery were higher in women with stillbirth compared with women with live birth. Differences were substantial in women with diabetes, suggesting a potential benefit of glycaemic control in women with diabetes during pregnancy. The small differences noted in women without diabetes are not likely to justify routine screening in all cases of stillbirth. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Maternal serum fructosamine levels are higher in women with stillbirth than in women with live birth, especially in women with diabetes.

Stillbirth and fetal anomalies: secondary analysis of a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: Approximately 10% of stillbirths are attributed to fetal anomalies, but anomalies are also common in live births. We aimed to assess the relationship between anomalies, by system and stillbirth. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective, case-control study. SETTING: Multicentre, 59 hospitals in five regional catchment areas in the USA. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: All stillbirths and representative live birth controls. METHODS: Standardised postmortem examinations performed in stillbirths, medical record abstraction for stillbirths and live births. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of major anomalies, by type, compared between stillbirths and live births with univariable and multivariable analyses using weighted analysis to account for study design and differential consent. RESULTS: Of 465 singleton stillbirths included, 23.4% had one or more major anomalies compared with 4.3% of 1871 live births. Having an anomaly increased the odds of stillbirth; an increasing number of anomalies was more highly associated with stillbirth. Regardless of organ system affected, the presence of an anomaly increased the odds of stillbirth. These relationships remained significant if stillbirths with known genetic abnormalities were excluded. After multivariable analyses, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of stillbirth for any anomaly was 4.33 (95% CI 2.80-6.70) and the systems most strongly associated with stillbirth were cystic hygroma (aOR 29.97, 95% CI 5.85-153.57), and thoracic (aOR16.18, 95% CI 4.30-60.94) and craniofacial (aOR 35.25, 95% CI 9.22-134.68) systems. CONCLUSIONS: In pregnancies affected by anomalies, the odds of stillbirth are higher with increasing numbers of anomalies. Anomalies of nearly any organ system increased the odds of stillbirth even when adjusting for gestational age and maternal race. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Stillbirth risk increases with anomalies of nearly any organ system and with number of anomalies seen.

Marijuana use in young mothers and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between marijuana use and a composite adverse pregnancy outcome using biological sampling. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single tertiary center. POPULATION: Young women (13-22 years old) with singleton, non-anomalous pregnancies delivered from September 2011 to May 2017. METHODS: Exposure was defined as marijuana detected on universal urine toxicology testing or by self-report. Multivariable logistic regression modelling was used to estimate the effect of any marijuana use on the primary composite outcome. The effect of marijuana exposure was also estimated for self-reported use, toxicology-detected use, and multiple use detected by toxicology. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary composite outcome included spontaneous preterm birth, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, stillbirth, or small for gestational age. RESULTS: Of 1206 pregnant young women, 17.5% (n = 211) used marijuana. Among the women who used marijuana, 8.5% (n = 18) were identified by self-report alone, 63% (n = 133) by urine toxicology alone, and 28.4% (n = 60) by both. Urine toxicology testing results were available for 1092 (90.5%) births. The composite outcome occurred more frequently in pregnancies exposed to marijuana (46 versus 34%, P < 0.001). This remained significant after adjusting for race/ethnicity and tobacco in the multivariable model (adjusted OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.09-2.05). When marijuana exposure was defined by self-report only, the association with adverse pregnancy outcome became non-significant (adjusted OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.62-1.64). CONCLUSION: In a population of young women with nearly universal biological sampling, marijuana exposure was associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. The heterogeneity of findings in existing studies evaluating the impact of marijuana on mothers and neonates may result from the incomplete ascertainment of exposure. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Marijuana use, as detected by universal urine testing, was associated with a composite adverse pregnancy outcome among young mothers.

OBGYN screening for environmental exposures: A call for action.

BACKGROUND: Prenatal exposures have known adverse effects on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Professional societies recommend routine screening for environmental, occupational, and dietary exposures to reduce exposures and their associated sequelae. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the frequency of environmental exposure screening by obstetricians and gynecologists (OBGYNs) at initial patient visits. STUDY DESIGN: Practicing OBGYNs were approached at the University of Colorado and by social media. The survey instrument queried demographics, environmental literacy, and screening practices. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square and two-sample t-test. RESULTS: We received 312 online survey responses (response rate of 12%). Responding OBGYNs were predominantly female (96%), board-certified (78%), generalists (65%) with a mean age of 37.1 years. Fewer than half of physicians screened for the following factors: occupational exposures, environmental chemicals, air pollution, pesticide use, personal care products, household cleaners, water source, use of plastics for food storage, and lead and mercury exposure. Eighty five percent of respondents reported that they did not feel comfortable obtaining an environmental history and 58% respondents reported that they performed no regular screening of environmental exposures. A higher frequency of screening was associated with > 4 years of practice (p = 0.001), and having read the environmental committee opinion (p = <0.001). CONCLUSION: The majority of OBGYNs did not incorporate screening for known environmental exposures into routine practice. Reading the environmental committee opinions was strongly and significantly associated with a higher rate of screening. Improving physician comfort in counseling patients may enhance screening for exposures that affect reproductive health.

Low-dose aspirin for pre-eclampsia prevention in twins with elevated human chorionic gonadotropin.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to evaluate low-dose aspirin (LDA) for pre-eclampsia prevention in twin gestations with elevated maternal serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units High-Risk Aspirin trial for pre-eclampsia prevention. A threshold hCG level for predicting pre-eclampsia was identified in placebo-randomized patients. Pre-eclampsia incidence and time of onset were compared between treatment groups, overall and by hCG threshold category. RESULTS: Pre-eclampsia incidence was lower with LDA than with placebo (6% vs 16%, OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.82). An hCG threshold of 29.96 IU ml(-1) best predicted pre-eclampsia. In patients with hCG <29.96 IU ml(-1), the differences in pre-eclampsia incidence or time of onset were not significant. In patients with hCG >29.96 IU ml(-1), LDA was associated with lower pre-eclampsia incidence than placebo (6% vs 23%, OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.79) and delayed onset. CONCLUSION: Twin gestations with elevated hCG levels may benefit from LDA for pre-eclampsia prevention.

The impact of low-dose aspirin on preterm birth: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to determine whether low-dose aspirin (LDA) reduced the rate of preterm birth (PTB) in a cohort of women at high risk for preeclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units High-Risk Aspirin trial. Preterm births were categorized by phenotype: indicated, spontaneous or due to preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROMs). RESULTS: Of 1789 randomized women, 30.5% delivered before 37 weeks (18.5% indicated, 5.8% spontaneous and 6.2% following preterm PPROMs). Among women randomized to LDA, we observed a trend favoring fewer PTBs due to spontaneous preterm labor and preterm PPROMs, odds ratio (OR: 0.826 (0.620, 1.099)); the incidence of indicated PTBs appeared unchanged, OR: 0.999 (0.787, 1.268). CONCLUSION: Although not reaching significance, we observed an effect size similar to other studies of both low- and high-risk women. These results support findings from other studies assessing LDA as a PTB prevention strategy.

Early initiation of low-dose aspirin for reduction in preeclampsia risk in high-risk women: a secondary analysis of the MFMU High-Risk Aspirin Study.

OBJECTIVE: Early initiation of low-dose aspirin (LDA) may reduce preeclampsia risk. We sought to determine whether LDA was beneficial when initiated <17w0d, within a trial of high-risk women enrolled <26w0d. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units High-Risk Aspirin study, including women enrolled <17w0d, randomized to LDA (60 mg day(-1)) or placebo with chronic hypertension (CHTN, n=186), diabetes (n=191) or prior preeclampsia (n=146). The primary outcome was preeclampsia at any time in pregnancy, secondary outcomes were early preeclampsia (<34w0d), late preeclampsia (⩾34w), small for gestational age (SGA; neonatal birthweight <10th %) and composite (early preeclampsia or SGA). Outcomes were compared by exact Χ(2)-tests. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups. Aspirin was associated with a lower rate of late-onset preeclampsia ⩾34w (17.36% vs 24.42%, P=0.047), with a 41% reduction in women with CHTN (18.28% vs 31.18%, P=0.041). There were no other significant differences in the outcome. CONCLUSION: Aspirin initiated <17w0d reduced the risk for late-onset preeclampsia by 29% supporting the practice of early initiation of aspirin in high-risk women.

PROCEED: Prospective Obesity Cohort of Economic Evaluation and Determinants: baseline health and healthcare utilization of the US sample.

AIM: To summarize baseline characteristics, health conditions, resource utilization and resource cost for the US population for the 90-day period preceding enrolment, stratified by body mass index (BMI) and the presence of abdominal obesity (AO). METHODS: PROCEED (Prospective Obesity Cohort of Economic Evaluation and Determinants) is a multinational, prospective cohort of control (BMI 20-24.0 kg/m(2)), overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m(2)) and obese (BMI >or= 30 kg/m(2)) subjects with AO and without AO [non-abdominal obesity (NAO)], defined by waist circumference (WC) >102 and 88 cm for males and females, respectively. Subjects were recruited from an Internet consumer panel. Outcomes were self-reported online. Self-reported anthropometric data were validated. Prevalence of conditions and utilization is presented by BMI class and AO within BMI class. Differences in prevalence and means were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1067 overweight [n = 474 (NAO: n = 254 and AO: n = 220)] and obese [n = 493 (NAO: n = 39 and AO: n = 454)] subjects and 100 controls were recruited. Self-reported weight (r = 0.92) and WC (r = 0.87) were correlated with measured assessments. Prevalence of symptoms was significantly higher in groups with higher BMI, as were hypertension (p < 0.0001), diabetes (p < 0.0001) and sleep apnoea (p < 0.0001). Metabolic risk factors increased with the BMI class. Among the overweight class, subjects with AO had significantly more reported respiratory, heart, nervous, skin and reproductive system symptoms. Overweight subjects with AO reported a significantly higher prevalence of diabetes (13%) compared with overweight subjects with NAO (7%, p = 0.04). Mean healthcare cost was significantly higher in the higher BMI classes [control ($456 +/- 937) vs. overweight ($1084 +/- 3531) and obese ($1186 +/- 2808) (p < 0.0001)]. CONCLUSION: An increasing gradient of symptoms, medical conditions, metabolic risk factors and healthcare utilization among those with a greater degree of obesity was observed. The independent effect of AO on health and healthcare utilization deserves further study with a larger sample size.