The criminalisation of women's healthcare in the post-Dobbs era: an analysis of the anti-abortion trigger law statutes.

On 24 June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organisation held that:'The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives.'Since the ruling, thirteen states have enacted 'trigger laws' that restrict access to abortion except in specified circumstances, such as to save the life of the pregnant patient in a medical emergency. These laws not only inappropriately insert the State into the physician-patient relationship, but create an uncertain practice landscape for physicians by placing them at risk of criminal penalties. We illustrate the complexity of medical decision making for pregnant patients using examples from the case report literature, and discuss how leaving the definition of 'medical emergency' up to courts to decide will create a patchwork of restrictive and permissive standards that criminalises physicians and creates a 'political standard of care' that replaces evidence based medical care.

Medical emergency exemption clauses within laws restricting access to abortion undermine the physician-patient relationship and the complexity of medical decision making, creating a 'political standard of care' that replaces evidence based medical care.

Impact of the Las Vegas Mass Shooting Event on the Graduate Medical Education Mission: Can There Be Growth from Tragedy?

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to determine the psychological and educational impact of the 2017 Las Vegas mass shooting on the graduate medical education (GME) mission within two cohorts of resident physicians and attending faculty at two nearby academic trauma centers. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey assessed 55 resident physicians and attending faculty involved in the acute care of the patients from the mass shooting. We measured the psychological impact of the event, post-traumatic growth, team cohesion, social support, and known risk factors for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Additionally, we assessed the impact of the event on GME-specific tasks. RESULTS: Attending faculty and physicians in training in GME residencies evaluated over 300 penetrating trauma patients in less than 24 hours, and approximately 1 in 3 physicians had a patient die under their care. Despite this potential for psychological trauma, the majority of clinicians reported minimal distress and minimal impact on GME activities. However, 1 in 10 physicians screened positive for possible PTSD. Paradoxically, the minority of physicians who sought psychological counseling after the event (20%) were not those who reported the highest levels of distress. Residents generally assessed the event as having an overall negative impact on their educational goals, while attendings reported a positive impact. Psychological impact correlated inversely with social support and the amount of prior education relating to mass casualty incidents (MCI) but correlated directly with the degree of stress prior to the event. CONCLUSION: Despite the substantial level of exposure, most resident physicians did not report significant psychological trauma or an impact on their GME mission. Some reported post-traumatic growth. However, a minority reported a significant negative impact; institutions should consider broad screening efforts to detect and assist these individuals after a MCI. Social support, stress reduction, and education on MCIs may buffer the effects of future psychologically traumatic events on physicians in training.

Creating Consensus: Revisiting the Emergency Medicine Resident Scholarly Activity Requirement.

INTRODUCTION: In the context of the upcoming single accreditation system for graduate medical education resulting from an agreement between the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), American Osteopathic Association and American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine, we saw the opportunity for charting a new course for emergency medicine (EM) scholarly activity (SA). Our goal was to engage relevant stakeholders to produce a consensus document. METHODS: Consensus building focused on the goals, definition, and endpoints of SA. Representatives from stakeholder organizations were asked to help develop a survey regarding the SA requirement. The survey was then distributed to those with vested interests. We used the preliminary data to find areas of concordance and discordance and presented them at a consensus-building session. Outcomes were then re-ranked. RESULTS: By consensus, the primary role(s) of SA should be the following: 1) instruct residents in the process of scientific inquiry; 2) expose them to the mechanics of research; 3) teach them lifelong skills, including search strategies and critical appraisal; and 4) teach them how to formulate a question, search for the answer, and evaluate its strength. To meet these goals, the activity should have the general elements of hypothesis generation, data collection and analytical thinking, and interpretation of results. We also determined consensus on the endpoints, and acceptable documentation of the outcome. CONCLUSION: This consensus document may serve as a best-practices guideline for EM residency programs by delineating the goals, definitions, and endpoints for EM residents' SA. However, each residency program must evaluate its available scholarly activity resources and individually implement requirements by balancing the ACGME Review Committee for Emergency Medicine requirements with their own circumstances.

Performance indicators for response to selected infectious disease outbreaks: a review of the published record.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether published reports of infectious disease outbreaks could serve as a source of evidence for public health practice, particularly in responding to bioterrorism. Such performance indicators are measures of practice and process that lead to optimal health outcomes. We collected data from 116 individual articles that described 59 outbreaks of eight different pathogens with potential for bioterrorist use. Analysis of these reports determined whether they addressed 12 process indicators and four outcome indicators--each generally recognized as a component of effective outbreak response. The results showed that outbreak reports typically included information about these process and outcome indicators, thus validating their practical importance. However, few reports had been written with specificity to document the chronology of outbreak response, or the dissemination of information to protect healthcare workers, or the communication with law enforcement and emergency operations that are important in response to bioterrorism. We conclude that the published record of infectious disease outbreaks can, in the future, be used as a source for practice-based evidence if agreed-upon measures for effective performance become standard components of outbreak reports.

Financial implications of hospital response to bioterrorism based on diagnosis-related group analysis.

INTRODUCTION: During an infectious disease outbreak, the ability of a hospital to continue routine operations depends upon its ability to absorb expected losses in revenue when the routine charge base is replaced by infectious disease-related charges. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the probable financial impact of a bioterrorism event or an infectious disease outbreak on an academic and a community hospital. METHODS: During the fiscal year 01 July 2002-30 June 2003, the average number of inpatient charges identified by the diagnosis-related-groups (DRGs) of an academic, tertiary care, Level-1 trauma center (PUH) and a community hospital (StM) were obtained retrospectively. Per diem charges were determined for patients with: (1) gastroenteritis; (2) sepsis; (3) meningitis; (4) tuberculosis (TB); and (5) pneumonia. These charges were used to simulate the financial coding of patients exposed to biological agents. RESULTS: The total average PUH per diem charges per patient for all 31,530 discharges was (US)$10,516. Specifically, the average changes were $20,499 for patients with transplants, $14,406 for receiving critical care services, $12,650 for the provision of cardiac care, $11,576 for trauma/orthopedic care, and $8,259 for services for patients who suffered a stroke. For patients with infectious diseases, the average per diem charges per patient were: (1) $6,184 for patients with gastroenteritis; (2) $7,842 for patients with sepsis; (3) $10,831 for patients with meningitis; (4) $6,118 for patients with TB; and (5) $4,586 for patients with pneumonia. Per patient per day, PUH would generate a potential net on average loss of: (1) $4,332 for gastroenteritis; (2) $2,674 for sepsis; (3) $4,398 for TB; and (4) $5,930 for pneumonia replaced an admission. Patients with meningitis on average generated a net gain ($315) compared to the average, but would not compensate for the denial of transplant, cardiac, trauma/orthopedic, and some critical care services during the event. Total average StM per diem charges per patient for all 10,470 discharges equaled $3,008. Specifically, $4,965 for critical care, $3,022 for cardiac care, $4,397 for trauma/orthopedic care, and $3,037 for stroke services. For infectious diseases, the average per diem charge per patient was: (1) $2,273 (+$735) for gastroenteritis; (2) $3,047 (+$39) for sepsis; (3) $2,504 (-$504) for meningitis; (4) $2,887 ($120) for TB; and (5) $2,652 (-$356) for pneumonia (net loss/gain in parenthesis). CONCLUSIONS: Through DRG analysis, the probable financial impact of a bioterrorist attack on a Health Care Delivery System is largely detrimental. Preparedness for a biological event must include an assessment of hospital capability and capacity to handle these types of patients, but also must consider the financial ability to absorb expected losses in charges or ways in which to recover the losses.

Prevalence of radioactive signals from surveillance of an emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: Since the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States, concerns have been raised regarding the threat of a radiological terrorist weapon. Although the probability of the employment of a nuclear device is remote, the potential of a radiological dispersal device (RDD) or "dirty bomb" is of concern. While it is unlikely that such a device would produce massive numbers of casualties, it is far more likely that it would result in public panic and perhaps even disable the local healthcare system. The utility of surveillance with radiation detectors in the healthcare setting has not been fully evaluated. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to characterize the prevalence of radioactive sources entering an urban emergency department (ED). METHODS: A retrospective review of data obtained from a radiation detector positioned to detect radioactive people entering an ED of an urban academic hospital that serves 45,000 patients/year was performed. Graphical outputs of radioactivity were recorded in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, US) spreadsheets in microREM/hour. Data were collected continuously from 22 December 2003 to 22 January 2004. An event was defined as any elevation in radiation levels >95% confidence interval from the mean level of background radiation over 72 hours (h). RESULTS: A total of 215 events were observed over a 28-day period, with a mean value of 7.7 events/day, and a maximum of 15 events/day. During the 28-day period, the baseline mean level of background radiation was 2-4 microREM/h. Readings ranged from 2,148.28-17,292.25 microREM/h with a maximum sustained detector exposure of 684.37 microREM. Distinct signal patterns were seen at both detectors including tonic, phasic, dual, and short duration spikes. CONCLUSION: The number of radioactive signals detected from persons entering the ED was much higher than expected. While the vast majority of these signals pose no health threat, they may make routine screening for a radiological terrorist event difficult. Further study is needed to determine this correlation.

Linkages of acute care and EMS to state and local public health programs: application to public health programs.

Response to terrorism and mass casualty incidents has become a focal point for many public service agencies. Public health agencies and the emergency response community must work together to effectively and efficiently respond to any future incidents. Historically, collaboration has been a challenge since these agencies have functioned independently from one another, maintaining separate infrastructures that are not adequately interoperable. This article will summarize the consensus achieved during a meeting of multidisciplinary stakeholders held to discuss linkages between acute care, emergency medical services, and public health. The relevancy of these findings to public health, as well as the benefits from development of an interoperable infrastructure to public health, will be opined.

Representative threats for research in public health surveillance.

A large number of biological agents can cause natural or bioterroristic disease outbreaks and each can present in a bewildering number of ways (e.g., a few cases versus many cases, confined to a building versus widely disseminated). This 'problem space' is a challenge for designers of early warning systems for disease outbreaks and the sheer size of this space is a barrier to progress. This paper addresses this problem by deriving nine categories of threats that represent a parsimonious characterization of the problem space. A literature search also identified one or more example outbreaks for each of the nine categories. These outbreaks have occurred in recent times and could be used by researchers in need of actual outbreak data for investigations of the role of different types of surveillance data and algorithms in outbreak detection. The methodological contribution of this research is a Criterion Set of threats for analysis and evaluation of detection systems. This set characterizes the problem space in a tractable manner with less loss of generality than analyses based on one or two selected diseases, which is representative of current analyses.