RESUMO
Introduction: Antibiotic resistance (ABR) is defined as bacteria's resistance to therapy despite therapeutic levels of antibiotics. It is a global health concern. Data on the antibiotic prescription practice of physicians, in general, are limited in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, we aim to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of antibiotic prescription between surgical and non-surgical residents at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at KAMC in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, from September 2019, until March 2020. The questionnaire contained demographic information and 31 questions based on the studied variables: knowledge (17), attitude (4), and practice (10). Results: The response rate was 83 %. Male to female response rates were 54 % and 46 %, respectively. The majority of respondents (72 %) were non-surgical residents. Positive practice skills showed that 55 % of all healthcare residents always used practice guidelines for antibiotic prescription in their daily work (P-value < 0.001). Most residents (50 %) sometimes used delayed prescriptions. Non-surgical residents discussed ABR with patients more than surgical residents (P-value = 0.028). Lack of patient interest was the common cause for not discussing ABR with patients (42 %). Non-surgical residents had significantly more training on antibiotic prescription (p-value = 0.001). The fear of infection spread due to not prescribing an antibiotic was significantly higher in non-surgical residents (P-value < 0.001). Non-surgical residents (76 %) took a past medical history of antibiotic consumption more than surgical residents (24 %) (P-value = 0.003). Antibiotic prescription for residents was not influenced by advertisements (91 %). The most common resistant organisms reported by residents were insignificant between the two groups. The results also showed that the residents' common choice of antibiotics was not statistically different between surgical and non-surgical residents in most antibiotic classes. Conclusions: We found that practice guidelines, formal training, and taking patients' past medical histories were significantly higher among non-surgical residents. In contrast, surgical residents were prescribing more antibiotics due to the fear of the spread of the infection. Proper training is essential for all healthcare residents to overcome differences among different specialties.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pregnancy in women aged 35 years or above is generally considered an advanced maternal age (AMA). AMA is associated with an increased rate of maternal and neonatal complications. OBJECTIVES: Assess the effect of AMA on maternal and neonatal outcomes. DESIGN: Analytical cross-sectional study of medical records. SETTINGS: In-patient hospital tertiary care setting in Jeddah. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All women who attended antenatal care and delivered at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Jeddah in the first half of 2018 were included in the study. Outcomes for women 35 years of age or older were compared with younger women. Significant factors in a univariate analysis were entered in a multiple logistic regression model to assess the association between AMA and outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of maternal neonatal complications, analysis of factors associated with advanced maternal, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), cesarean delivery. SAMPLE SIZE: 1586 women. RESULTS: Of the 1586 women, 406 were 35 years of age or older (25.6%), and 1180 were younger than 35 years. The AMA group had a significantly higher proportion of GDM (32.0% versus 13.2%, P<.001). The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for GDM was 2.6 (95% CI 2-3.5, P<.001.) compared with younger women in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Older women had a higher rate of cesarean delivery (43.6% versus 30.8%, P<.001). The adjusted OR for cesarean vs. vaginal delivery was 1.5 (CI 1.2-1.9, P=.002). CONCLUSION: Pregnancy in women 35 years or older was associated with an increased risk of GDM and cesarean delivery. LIMITATIONS: Cross-sectional design, small sample size, single hospital. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.
