Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Multidiscip Healthc ; 17: 1179-1188, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38505651

RESUMO

Purpose: To evaluate physicians' knowledge of the ABCDE (Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Exposure) approach components. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2023 using an online questionnaire in order to collect data about the knowledge of the ABCDE approach's components among physicians in different specialties in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Results: The number of participants were 165 in total and the median knowledge score for all participants was 15.0, with an associated interquartile range (IQR) of 10.0 to 20.0. Intensive Care Medicine had the highest median knowledge score of 19.0 (IQR: 12.0-21.0), followed by Internal Medicine at 17.0 (IQR: 13.0-20.0). Conversely, Cardiology and Anesthesiology showed lower scores, with medians of 8.0 (IQR: 4.0-10.0) and 7.5 (IQR: 4.0-13.5), respectively (p = 0.011). Senior Registrars demonstrated the highest median knowledge score of 20.0 (IQR: 14.0-22.0), while Fellows had the lowest at 8.5 (IQR: 7.0-13.0) (p < 0.001). Practicing for 10 to 15 years and more than 15 years having medians of 20.0 (IQR: 16.0-23.0) and 19.0 (IQR: 17.0-22.0), respectively. However, participants with less experience, working for less than 5 years, had a median score of 12.0 (IQR: 8.5-16.5) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Knowledge scores of physicians representing various medical specialties found diverse levels regarding the ABCDE approach. Knowledge scores were significantly influenced by the primary area of practice, level of experience, and duration worked in the profession, highlighting the need for tailored training and education across different specialties and career stages. On the other hand, future studies should concentrate on finding new factors that influence practice adherence to the ABCDE approach and tying theoretical knowledge to clinical practice.

2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 102(29): e34337, 2023 Jul 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37478246

RESUMO

A common occurrence in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is metabolic acidosis. Sodium bicarbonate (SB) has been widely used, but there is insufficient evidence on how SB affects neonates in NICUs with metabolic acidosis. The worsening of intracellular acidosis, the impairment of myocardial function, fluctuations in cerebral blood flow, and intracranial hemorrhage are some of the unfavorable effects of SB treatment in neonates that have been documented in the literature. This study aimed to explore neonatologists' practices for using intravenous SB (ISB) in NICUs. A multi-country survey was carried out in 2022 using an online questionnaire sent to neonatologists in various countries in order to gather information about the use of ISB in NICUs. A previously validated questionnaire was adapted and used in this study. The response rate was 67%. The findings show that 91.2% of neonatologists were using SB to correct metabolic acidosis in the NICU; 71.4% did not have written guidelines for using sodium bicarbonate. The majority of them (78.9%) reported that dosage is included in their guidelines for the use of ISB. The findings of this study emphasize the critical importance of providing guidelines in using ISB for managing metabolic acidosis in NICU to standardize procedures and reduce the use of potentially unsuitable and unsafe treatments, as it has been shown that 71.4% of neonatologists worldwide use sodium bicarbonate without guidelines.


Assuntos
Acidose , Bicarbonato de Sódio , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Bicarbonato de Sódio/uso terapêutico , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Acidose/tratamento farmacológico , Inquéritos e Questionários , Administração Intravenosa
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...