Differences in clinical outcomes based on molecular markers in glioblastoma patients treated with concurrent tumor-treating fields and chemoradiation: exploratory analysis of the SPARE trial.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults. Despite enormous research efforts, GBM remains a deadly disease. The standard-of-care treatment for patients with newly diagnosed with GBM as per the National Cancer Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) is maximal safe surgical resection followed by concurrent chemoradiation and maintenance temozolomide (TMZ) with adjuvant tumor treating fields (TTF). TTF is a non-pharmacological intervention that delivers low-intensity, intermediate frequency alternating electric fields that arrests cell proliferation by disrupting the mitotic spindle. TTF have been shown in a large clinical trial to improve patient outcomes when added to radiation and chemotherapy. The SPARE trail (Scalp-sparing radiation with concurrent temozolomide and tumor treating fields) evaluated adding TTF concomitantly to radiation and chemotherapy. METHODS: This study is an exploratory analysis of the SPARE trial looking at the prognostic significance of common GBM molecular alterations, namely MGMT, EGFR, TP53, PTEN and telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), in this cohort of patients treated with concomitant TTF with radiation and chemotherapy. RESULTS: As expected, MGMT promoter methylation was associated with improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in this cohort. In addition, TERT promoter mutation was associated with improved OS and PFS in this cohort as well. CONCLUSIONS: Leveraging the molecular characterization of GBM alongside advancing treatments such as chemoradiation with TTF presents a new opportunity to improve precision oncology and outcomes for GBM patients.

Concurrent chemoradiation and Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields, 200 kHz) for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: patterns of progression in a single institution pilot study.

Current standard of care for glioblastoma (GBM) includes concurrent chemoradiation and maintenance temozolomide (TMZ) with Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields). Preclinical studies suggest TTFields and radiation treatment have synergistic effects. We conducted a pilot clinical trial of concurrent chemoradiation with TTFields and report pattern of progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single arm pilot study (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03477110). Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with KPS ≥ 60 with newly diagnosed GBM were eligible. All patients received concurrent scalp-sparing radiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions), standard concurrent TMZ and TTFields. Maintenance therapy included standard TMZ and continuation of TTFields. Radiation treatment was delivered through TTFields arrays. Incidence and location of progression was documented. Distant recurrence was defined as recurrence more than 2 cm from the primary enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled on the trial. Twenty were male with median age 58 years (19-77 years). Median KPS was 90 (70-100). Median follow-up was 15.2 months (1.7-23.6 months). Ten (33.3%) patients had a methylated promoter status. Twenty-seven patients (90%) had progression, with median PFS of 9.3 months (range 8.5 to 11.6 months). Six patients presented with distant recurrence, with median distance from primary lesion of 5.05 cm (2.26-6.95 cm). One infratentorial progression was noted. CONCLUSIONS: We observed improved local control using concurrent chemoradiation with TTFields for patients with newly diagnosed when compared to historical controls. Further data are needed to validate this finding. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT03477110.

Scalp-Sparing Radiation With Concurrent Temozolomide and Tumor Treating Fields (SPARE) for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma.

Introduction: Standard-of-care treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) after surgery or biopsy includes concurrent chemoradiation followed by maintenance temozolomide (TMZ) with tumor treating fields (TTFields). Preclinical studies suggest TTFields and radiotherapy work synergistically. We report the results of our trial evaluating the safety of TTFields used concurrently with chemoradiation. Methods: This is a single-arm pilot study (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03477110). Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) of ≥ 60 were eligible. All patients received concurrent scalp-sparing radiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions) with TMZ (75 mg/m2 daily) and TTFields (200 kHz). Maintenance therapy included TMZ and continuation of TTFields. Scalp-sparing radiation treatment was used to reduce radiation dermatitis. Radiation treatment was delivered through the TTFields arrays. The primary endpoint was safety and toxicity of tri-modality treatment within 30 days of completion of chemoradiation treatment. Results: There were 30 patients enrolled, including 20 (66.7%) men and 10 (33.3%) women, with a median age of 58 years (range 19 to 77 years). Median KPS was 90 (range 70 to 100). A total of 12 (40%) patients received a gross total resection and 18 (60%) patients had a subtotal resection. A total of 12 (40%) patients had multifocal disease at presentation. There were 20 (66.7%) patients who had unmethylated O(6)-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promotor status and 10 (33.3%) patients who had methylated MGMT promoter status. Median follow-up was 15.2 months (range 1.7 to 23.6 months). Skin adverse events were noted in 83.3% of patients, however, these were limited to Grade 1 or 2 events, which resolved spontaneously or with topical medications. The primary end point was met; no TTFields discontinuation occurred during the evaluation period due to high grade scalp toxicity. A total of 27 (90%) patients had progression, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.3 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 8.5-11.6 months). The 1-year progression-free survival was 23% (95% CI: 12%-45%). The median overall survival (OS) was 15.8 months (95% CI: 12.5 months-infinity). The 1-year overall survival was 66% (95% CI: 51%-86%). Conclusions: Concurrent TTFields with scalp-sparing chemoradiation is a feasible and well-tolerated treatment option with limited toxicity. A phase 3, randomized clinical trial (EF-32, clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04471844) investigating the clinical benefit of concurrent TTFields with chemoradiation treatment is currently enrolling. Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT03477110.

Corrigendum to: Impact of lymphopenia on survival for elderly patients with glioblastoma: A secondary analysis of the CCTG CE.6 (EORTC 26062-22061, TROG 08.02) randomized clinical trial.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab153.].

Impact of lymphopenia on survival for elderly patients with glioblastoma: A secondary analysis of the CCTG CE.6 (EORTC 26062-22061, TROG03.01) randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Lymphopenia may lead to worse outcomes for glioblastoma patients. This study is a secondary analysis of the CCTG CE.6 trial evaluating the impact of chemotherapy and radiation on lymphopenia, and effects of lymphopenia on overall survival (OS). METHODS: CCTG CE.6 randomized elderly glioblastoma patients (≥ 65 years) to short-course radiation alone (RT) or short-course radiation with temozolomide (RT + TMZ). Lymphopenia (mild-moderate: grade 1-2; severe: grade 3-4) was defined per CTCAE v3.0, and measured at baseline, 1 week and 4 weeks post-RT. Preselected key factors for analysis included age, sex, ECOG, resection extent, MGMT methylation, Mini-Mental State Examination, and steroid use. Multinomial logistic regression and multivariable Cox regression models were used to identify lymphopenia-associated factors and association with survival. RESULTS: Five hundred and sixty-two patients were analyzed (281 RT vs 281 RT+TMZ). At baseline, both arms had similar rates of mild-moderate (21.4% vs 21.4%) and severe (3.2% vs 2.9%) lymphopenia. However, at 4 weeks post-RT, RT+TMZ was more likely to develop lymphopenia (mild-moderate: 27.9% vs 18.2%; severe: 9.3% vs 1.8%; p<0.001). Developing any lymphopenia post-RT was associated with baseline lymphopenia (P < .001). Baseline lymphopenia (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3) was associated with worse OS (HR: 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.62; P = .02), regardless of MGMT status. CONCLUSIONS: Development of post-RT lymphopenia is associated with addition of TMZ and baseline lymphopenia and not with RT alone in patients treated with short-course radiation. However, regardless of MGMT status, only baseline lymphopenia is associated with worse OS, which may be considered as a prognostic biomarker for elderly glioblastoma patients.

Targeted Therapy for BRAF Mutant Brain Tumors.

OPINION STATEMENT: Molecular heterogeneity has confounded attempts to target individual pathways in brain tumors. However, gliomas with BRAF mutations have been identified as being uniquely vulnerable to targeted therapies. Such mutations are predominantly seen in brain tumors of the adolescent and young adult population. Given that accurate and timely identification of such mutations is essential for offering appropriate treatment, treatment centers should offer both immunohistochemical and sequencing methods for detection of these mutations to guide treatment. Additional studies of these tumors at recurrence would also allow identification of breakthrough resistance mechanisms that may also be targetable for treatment. Due to the relative rarity of these tumors, multicenter collaborative studies will be essential in achieving long term control of these tumors.

Assessment of Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis Diagnosis, Management and Outcomes in Patients with Solid Tumors Over a Decade of Experience.

OBJECTIVE: Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC), a common complication of advanced malignancies, is associated with high morbidity and mortality, yet diagnosis and treatment decisions remain challenging. This study describes the diagnostic and treatment modalities for LMC and identifies factors associated with overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a single-institution retrospective study (registration #: OSU2016C0053) of 153 patients diagnosed with LMC treated at The Ohio State University, Comprehensive Cancer Center, (OSUCCC)-James between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2015. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 55.7 years, and 61% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group baseline performance status ≤1. Most common primary tumors were breast (43%), lung (26%), and cutaneous melanoma (10%). At presentation, most patients were stage III-IV (71%) with higher grade tumors (grade III: 46%). Metastases to bone (36%), brain (33%), and lung (12%) were the most common sites with a median of 0.5 years (range, 0-14.9 years) between the diagnosis of first metastasis and of LMC. 153 (100%) patients had MRI evidence of LMC. Of the 67 (44%) who underwent lumbar puncture (LP), 33 (22%) had positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology. Most patients received radiotherapy for LMC (60%) and chemotherapy (93%) for either the primary disease or LMC. 28 patients received intrathecal chemotherapy, 22 of whom had a primary diagnosis of breast cancer. 98% died with median OS of all patients was 1.9 months (95% CI: 1.3-2.5 months). CONCLUSION: Despite improved treatments and targeted therapies, outcomes of LMC remain extremely poor. Positive CSF cytology was associated with lower OS in patients who had cytology assessed and specifically in patients with breast cancer. CSF cytology serves as an important indicator for prognosis and helps aid in developing individualized therapeutic strategies for patients with LMC.

Prognostic implications of epidermal and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alterations in 2 cohorts of IDHwt glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma remains a deadly brain cancer with dismal prognosis. Genetic alterations, including IDH mutations, 1p19q co-deletion status and MGMT promoter methylation have been proven to be prognostic and predictive to response to treatment in gliomas. In this manuscript, we aimed to correlate other mutations and genetic alterations with various clinical endpoints in patients with IDH-wild-type (IDHwt) glioblastoma. METHODS: We compiled a comprehensive clinically annotated database of IDHwt GBM patients treated at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center for whom we had mutational data through a CLIA-certified genomic laboratory. We then added data that is publicly available from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center through cBioPortal. Each of the genetic alterations (mutations, deletions, and amplifications) served as a variable in univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: A total of 175 IDHwt GBM patients with available MGMT promoter methylation data from both cohorts were included in the analysis. As expected, MGMT promoter methylation was significantly associated with improved overall survival (OS). Median OS for MGMT promoter methylated and unmethylated GBM was 26.5 and 18 months, respectively (HR 0.45; P = .003). Moreover, EGFR/ERBB alterations were associated with favorable outcome (HR of 0.37 (P = .003), but only in MGMT promoter unmethylated GBM. We further found that patients with EGFR/ERBB alterations who also harbored PDGFRA amplification had a significantly worse outcome (HR 7.89; P = .025). CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide further insight into the impact of genetic alterations on various clinical outcomes in IDHwt GBM in 2 cohorts of patients with detailed clinical information and inspire new therapeutic strategies for IDHwt GBM.

Erratum to: Characterizing Benefit from Temozolomide in MGMT Promoter Unmethylated and Methylated Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa082.].

The role of VEGF receptor inhibitors in preventing cerebral radiation necrosis: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Radiation necrosis (RN) is a potential complication after radiation therapy for brain tumors. It is hypothesized that VEGF plays an important role in the pathophysiology of RN. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against VEGF-A, is often successful in the management of RN. The objective of this study is to assess whether VEGF receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors, a group of oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), can prevent or reverse RN. METHODS: We retrospectively studied a cohort of 102 patients with renal cell carcinoma and brain metastases seen at The Ohio State University James Cancer Center between January 1, 2011 and April 30, 2019. We identified those who developed RN and analyzed the temporal relationship between the use of VEGFR TKIs and the development of RN. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of RN is 13.7% after radiation treatments that included LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery, fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, or Gamma Knife radiosurgery. There was no statistically significant difference in the cumulative incidence of RN between patients taking TKIs and patients who were off TKIs (9.9% and 11.5% respectively, P = .741). The median time to development of RN was only numerically shorter in patients taking TKIs (151 vs 315 days, P = .315). One patient developed RN after stopping cabozantinib. Eight patients developed RN while on cabozantinib, pazopanib, or sunitinib. One patient was started on axitinib during active RN without significant improvement subsequently. CONCLUSIONS: VEGFR TKIs do not consistently prevent RN. The therapeutic effects of VEGFR TKIs against RN warrant further research.

Characterizing benefit from temozolomide in MGMT promoter unmethylated and methylated glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The current standard of care for the management of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) includes maximal safe resection followed by radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). While it is well established that TMZ has better efficacy in patients with MGMT promoter methylation, it remains an area of debate whether TMZ should be omitted when treating GBM patients with unmethylated MGMT. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide separate estimates of median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with methylated and unmethylated GBM treated with RT with or without TMZ. We searched multiple databases from inception to January 13, 2020. RESULTS: The median OS for patients with unmethylated GBM treated with RT/TMZ pooled from 5 phase III studies (N = 655) was 14.11 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.18-15.04) with a median PFS of 4.99 months (95% CI, 4.25-5.72). In contrast, the median OS for patients with methylated GBM pooled from 6 studies (N = 753) was 24.59 months (95% CI, 22.19-26.99) with a median PFS pooled from 7 studies (N = 805) of 9.51 months (95% CI, 7.41-11.61). There is a paucity of prospective data pertaining to OS/PFS in unmethylated patients treated with RT only and therefore a direct comparison was not possible. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides estimates of survival for patients with MGMT methylated or unmethylated GBM treated with RT/TMZ. Further research is needed to delineate whether TMZ should be withheld for patients with unmethylated GBM outside of the setting of clinical trials.

False-positive 1p/19q Testing Results in Gliomas: Clinical and Research Consequences.

BACKGROUND: The revised fourth edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System-published in 2016-established 1p19q codeletion as the molecular hallmark for the diagnosis of oligodendrogliomas. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is currently the most commonly used modality for 1p19q testing. However, as with most laboratory testing, 1p19q FISH testing has a false-positive rate, potentially resulting in an erroneous diagnosis of oligodendroglioma with significant implications for the choice of therapy and prognosis. METHODS: The authors describe a case series of 5 patients treated at the Ohio State University James Cancer Center to illustrate the problem of false-positive 1p19q FISH results. RESULTS: In our case series, the authors present a spectrum of possibilities for conflicting 1p19q testing results and the clinical consequences. The authors present 4 cases that, in retrospect, are believed to have had a false 1p19q FISH results. One other case may represent a true transformation of oligodendroglioma to glioblastoma or a second malignancy. Neuro-oncologists should pay attention to additional molecular markers, namely ATRX, TP53, and MGMT methylation status, before discussing the pathology with the patient and formulating a treatment plan. CONCLUSIONS: Pathologists and neuro-oncologists should be aware of false-positive 1p19q FISH results as they can significantly change treatment and prognosis for glioma patients. Moreover, this issue should be taken into account when designing clinical trials specific to this disease cohort.

Changing paradigms for targeted therapies against diffuse infiltrative gliomas: tackling a moving target.

Introduction: Gliomas are highly heterogeneous primary brain tumors which result in a disproportionately high degree of morbidity and mortality despite their locoregional occurrence. Advances in the understanding of the biological makeup of these malignancies have yielded a number of potential tumor-driving pathways which have been identified as rational targets for therapy. However, early trials of agents that target these pathways have uniformly failed to yield improvement in outcomes in patients with malignant gliomas. Areas covered: This review provides an overview of the most common biological features of gliomas and the strategies to target the same; in addition, the current status of immunotherapy and biological therapies are outlined and the future directions to tackle the challenges of therapy for gliomas are examined. Expert opinion: The limitations of current treatments are attributed to the inability of most of these agents to cross the blood-brain barrier and to the intrinsic heterogeneity of the tumors that result in treatment resistance. The recent emergence of immune-mediated and biological therapies and of agents that target metabolic pathways in gliomas have provided strategies that may overcome tumor heterogeneity and ongoing trials of such agents are anticipated to yield improved outcomes.

Treatment of Glioblastoma (GBM) with the Addition of Tumor-Treating Fields (TTF): A Review.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor. Despite aggressive treatment, GBM almost always recurs. The current standard-of-care for treatment of newly diagnosed GBM has remained relatively unchanged since 2005: maximal safe resection followed by concomitant chemoradiation (CRT) with temozolomide (TMZ), and subsequent adjuvant TMZ. In 2011, the first-generation tumor treating fields (TTF) device, known at the time as the NovoTTF-100A System (renamed Optune), was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of recurrent GBM. The TTF device was subsequently approved as an adjuvant therapy for newly-diagnosed GBM in 2015. The following is a review of the TTF device, including evidence supporting its use and limitations.

Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Methotrexate is first-line chemotherapy. Autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is increasingly used as an alternative consolidative treatment to whole-brain radiotherapy. METHODS: A systematic search of several databases was conducted up through January 10, 2018. Two investigators independently assessed study eligibility and extracted the data. Studies that reported survival outcomes after ASCT were included. RESULTS: We screened 1517 references and included 43 studies. ASCT was used as consolidative treatment or as salvage treatment/at relapse. Thiotepa, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide and carmustine/thiotepa were commonly used conditioning regimens. In the consolidation setting, 94% of patients experienced or maintained complete or partial response after ASCT. The rates of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 94%, 86%, 82%, and 70% and 79%, 70%, 64%, and 54% after 1, 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The overall risk of relapse at 5 years was 24%. In the salvage/relapse settings, 85% of patients experienced or maintained complete response or partial response after ASCT. The rates of OS and PFS were 75%, 63%, 56%, and 54% and 85%, 62%, 59%, and 54% after 1, 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The risk of relapse at 5 years was 29%. Subgroup analysis showed that the use of carmustine and thiotepa as a conditioning regimen carried the lowest risk of transplant-related mortality. The thiotepa, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide regimen, on the other hand, showed numerically superior OS and PFS rates. CONCLUSION: This review provides estimates for response and survival to aid in decision making when considering ASCT for patients with PCNSL.