Contour prognostic model for predicting survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases: development and multicentre validation study using largest diameter and number of metastases with RAS mutation status.

BACKGROUND: Most current models for predicting survival after resection of colorectal liver metastasis include largest diameter and number of colorectal liver metastases as dichotomous variables, resulting in underestimation of the extent of risk variation and substantial loss of statistical power. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a new prognostic model for patients undergoing liver resection including largest diameter and number of colorectal liver metastases as continuous variables. METHODS: A prognostic model was developed using data from patients who underwent liver resection for colorectal liver metastases at MD Anderson Cancer Center and had RAS mutational data. A Cox proportional hazards model analysis was used to develop a model based on largest colorectal liver metastasis diameter and number of metastases as continuous variables. The model results were shown using contour plots, and validated externally in an international multi-institutional cohort. RESULTS: A total of 810 patients met the inclusion criteria. Largest colorectal liver metastasis diameter (hazard ratio (HR) 1.11, 95 per cent confidence interval 1.06 to 1.16; P < 0.001), number of colorectal liver metastases (HR 1.06, 1.03 to 1.09; P < 0.001), and RAS mutation status (HR 1.76, 1.42 to 2.18; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with overall survival, together with age, primary lymph node metastasis, and prehepatectomy chemotherapy. The model performed well in the external validation cohort, with predicted overall survival values almost lying within 10 per cent of observed values. Wild-type RAS was associated with better overall survival than RAS mutation even when liver resection was performed for larger and/or multiple colorectal liver metastases. CONCLUSION: The contour prognostic model, based on diameter and number of lesions considered as continuous variables along with RAS mutation, predicts overall survival after resection of colorectal liver metastasis.

Performance of a modified three-level classification in stratifying open liver resection procedures in terms of complexity and postoperative morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Traditional classifications for open liver resection are not always associated with surgical complexity and postoperative morbidity. The aim of this study was to test whether a three-level classification for stratifying surgical complexity based on surgical and postoperative outcomes, originally devised for laparoscopic liver resection, is superior to classifications based on a previously reported survey for stratifying surgical complexity of open liver resections, minor/major nomenclature or number of resected segments. METHODS: Patients undergoing a first open liver resection without simultaneous procedures at MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston cohort) or the University of Tokyo (Tokyo cohort) were studied. Surgical and postoperative outcomes were compared among three grades: I (wedge resection for anterolateral or posterosuperior segment and left lateral sectionectomy); II (anterolateral segmentectomy and left hepatectomy); III (posterosuperior segmentectomy, right posterior sectionectomy, right hepatectomy, central hepatectomy and extended left/right hepatectomy). RESULTS: In both the Houston (1878 patients) and Tokyo (1202) cohorts, duration of operation, estimated blood loss and comprehensive complication index score differed between the three grades (all P < 0·050) and increased in stepwise fashion from grades I to III (all P < 0·001). Left hepatectomy was associated with better surgical and postoperative outcomes than right hepatectomy, extended right hepatectomy and right posterior sectionectomy, although these four procedures were categorized as being of medium complexity in the survey-based classification. Surgical outcomes of minor open liver resections also differed between the three grades (all P < 0·050). For duration of operation and blood loss, the area under the curve was higher for the three-level classification than for the minor/major or segment-based classification. CONCLUSION: The three-level classification may be useful in studies analysing open liver resection at Western and Eastern centres.

ANTECEDENTES: Las clasificaciones tradicionales de la resección hepática abierta (open liver resection, OLR) por número de segmentos resecados, no siempre se asocian con la complejidad quirúrgica y la morbilidad postoperatoria. El objetivo de este estudio fue comprobar si una clasificación de 3 niveles para estratificar la complejidad quirúrgica en función de los resultados quirúrgicos y postoperatorios, ideada originalmente para la resección hepática laparoscópica, es superior a las clasificaciones basadas en una encuesta descrita previamente para estratificar la complejidad quirúrgica de los procedimientos de OLR, nomenclatura menor/mayor, o número de segmentos resecados. MÉTODOS: Se estudiaron pacientes sometidos a una primera OLR sin otros procedimientos quirúrgicos concomitantes en el hospital MD Anderson (cohorte de Houston) o en la Universidad de Tokio (cohorte de Tokio). Se compararon los resultados quirúrgicos y postoperatorios entre 3 grados: I (resección limitada para el segmento anterolateral o posterosuperior y seccionectomía izquierda); II (segmentectomía anterolateral y hepatectomía izquierda); III (segmentectomía posterosuperior, seccionectomía posterior derecha, hepatectomía derecha, hepatectomía central y hepatectomía ampliada izquierda/derecha). RESULTADOS: En ambas cohortes de Houston (n = 1.878) y Tokio (n = 1.202), el tiempo operatorio, las pérdidas estimadas de sangre, y el índice de complejidad integral (comprehensive complication index) variaba en los 3 grados (todos P < 0,05) y aumentaba paso a paso desde los grados I a III (todos P < 0,05). La hepatectomía izquierda se asociaba con mejores resultados quirúrgicos y postoperatorios que la hepatectomía derecha, hepatectomía derecha ampliada, y seccionectomía posterior derecha, aunque estos cuatro procedimientos fueron categorizados como de complejidad intermedia en la clasificación basada en la encuesta. Los resultados quirúrgicos de las OLRs menores también variaron en los 3 grados (todos P < 0,05). Para el tiempo operatorio y la pérdida sanguínea, el área bajo la curva fue mayor para la clasificación de 3 niveles en el estudio actual, que para la clasificación menor/mayor o la clasificación basada en los segmentos. CONCLUSIÓN: La clasificación en 3 niveles puede ser útil en estudios que analizan las resecciones hepáticas abiertas en centros occidentales y orientales.

Extended pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in oncologic liver surgery is safe and effective.

Essentials The risk for venous thromboembolism after liver surgery remains high in the modern era. We evaluated the safety/efficacy of extended anticoagulation in liver surgery. This protocol reports zero venous thromboembolism events in 124 liver surgery patients. Extended anticoagulation after oncologic liver surgery is safe and effective. SUMMARY: Background The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after liver surgery remains high. Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of extended pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis after liver surgery for the prevention of VTE. Patient/Methods From August 2013 to April 2015, 124 patients who underwent liver resection for malignancy were placed on an extended pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis protocol. Intraoperative VTE prophylaxis included thromboembolic deterrent hoses and sequential compression devices. Once hemostasis had been ensured following hepatectomy, daily anticoagulant VTE prophylaxis was initiated for the duration of hospitalization. After hospital discharge, the large majority of patients (114, 91.9%) continued to receive anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis (enoxaparin) to complete a total course of 14 days after minor/minimally invasive hepatectomy or 28 days after major hepatectomy or a history of VTE. Results The cohort included 39 (31.2%) major hepatectomies and 38 (31.5%) minor/minimally invasive approaches. The intraoperative, postoperative and overall transfusion rates were 5.6%, 8.1%, and 10.5%, respectively. Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis was started on postoperative day (POD) 0 for 40 (32.3%) patients and on POD 1 for 84 (67.7%) patients. During 90 days of follow-up, no postoperative symptomatic deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolic events were diagnosed. Standard-protocol computed tomography scans of the chest, abdomen and pelvis that were obtained for 112 (90.3%) study patients showed no pulmonary emboli, or other thoracic, splanchnic or ileofemoral vein thromboses. Two (1.6%) patients had minor bleeding events that resolved after discontinuation of enoxaparin, requiring neither blood transfusion nor reoperation. The severe complication rate was 5.6%, with no 90-day mortalities. Conclusions These preliminary data suggest that extended pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis for liver surgery patients is safe and effective.

Embryonic origin of primary colon cancer predicts survival in patients undergoing ablation for colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: In patients with primary colorectal cancer (CRC) or unresectable metastatic CRC, midgut embryonic origin is associated with worse prognosis. The impact of embryonic origin on survival after ablation of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is unclear. METHODS: We identified 74 patients with CLM who underwent percutaneous ablation during 2004-2015. Survival and recurrence after ablation of CLM from midgut origin (n = 18) and hindgut origin (n = 56) were analyzed. Prognostic value of embryonic origin was evaluated. RESULTS: Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) after percutaneous ablation were worse in patients from midgut origin (3-year RFS: 5.6% vs. 24%, P = 0.004; 3-year OS: 25% vs. 70%, P 0.001). In multivariable analysis, factors associated with worse OS were midgut origin (hazard ratio [HR] 4.87, 95% CI 2.14-10.9, P 0.001), multiple CLM (HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.02-5.39, P = 0.044), and RAS mutation (HR 2.78, 95% CI 1.25-6.36, P = 0.013). At a median follow-up of 25 months, 56 patients (76%) had developed recurrence, 16 (89%) with midgut origin and 40 (71%) with hindgut origin (P = 0.133). Recurrent disease was treated with local therapy in 20 patients (36%), 2 (13%) with midgut origin and 18 (45%) with hindgut origin (P = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Compared to CLM from hindgut origin tumors, CLM from midgut origin tumors were associated with worse survival after ablation, which was partly attributable to the fact that patients with hindgut origin were more frequently candidates for local therapy at recurrence.

Local tumour progression after percutaneous ablation of colorectal liver metastases according to RAS mutation status.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous ablation is a common treatment for colorectal liver metastasis (CLM). However, the effect of rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (RAS) mutation on outcome after ablation of CLMs is unclear. METHODS: Patients who underwent image-guided percutaneous ablation of CLMs from 2004 to 2015 and had known RAS mutation status were analysed. Patients were evaluated for local tumour progression as observed on imaging of CLMs treated with ablation. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with local tumour progression-free survival. RESULTS: The study included 92 patients who underwent ablation of 137 CLMs. Thirty-six patients (39 per cent) had mutant RAS. Rates of local tumour progression were 14 per cent (8 of 56) for patients with wild-type RAS and 39 per cent (14 of 36) for patients with mutant RAS (P = 0·007). The actuarial 3-year local tumour progression-free survival rate after percutaneous ablation was worse in patients with mutant RAS than in those with wild-type RAS (35 versus 71 per cent respectively; P = 0·001). In multivariable analysis, negative predictors of local tumour progression-free survival were a minimum ablation margin of less than 5 mm (hazard ratio (HR) 2·48, 95 per cent c.i. 1·31 to 4·72; P = 0·006) and mutant RAS (HR 3·01, 1·60 to 5·77; P = 0·001). CONCLUSION: Mutant RAS is associated with an earlier and higher rate of local tumour progression in patients undergoing ablation of CLMs.

Prognostic value of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in patients undergoing resection of biliary tract cancer.

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of abnormally high levels of carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 after resection of biliary tract cancer (BTC) is not well established. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of CA19-9 normalization in patients undergoing resection of BTC with curative intent. METHODS: Patients with BTC undergoing resection with curative intent (1996-2015) were divided into those with normal preoperative CA19-9 level (normal CA19-9 group), those with an abnormally high preoperative CA19-9 level (over 37 units/ml) and normal postoperative CA19-9 level (normalization group), and those with an abnormally high preoperative CA19-9 level and abnormally high postoperative CA19-9 level (non-normalization group). Overall survival (OS) was analysed and predictors of OS were determined. RESULTS: The normal CA19-9 group (180 patients) and normalization group (74) had better OS than the non-normalization group (58) (3-year OS rate 70·4, 73 and 31 per cent respectively; both P < 0·001). The normal CA19-9 and normalization groups had equivalent OS (P = 0·880). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with worse OS were lymph node metastases (hazard ratio (HR) 1·78; P = 0·014) and abnormally high postoperative CA19-9 level (HR 3·16; P < 0·001). In the normalization group, OS did not differ after R0 versus R1 resection (3-year OS rate 69 versus 62 per cent respectively; P = 0·372); in the non-normalization group, patients with R1 resection had worse OS (3-year OS rate 36 and 20 per cent for R0 and R1 respectively; P = 0·032). CONCLUSION: Non-normalization of CA19-9 level after resection of BTC with curative intent was associated with worse OS. R1 resection was associated with a particularly poor prognosis when CA19-9 levels did not normalize.

Rate of Organ Space Infection Is Reduced with the Use of an Air Leak Test During Major Hepatectomies.

BACKGROUND: Organ/space surgical site infections (OSIs) constitute an important postoperative metric. We sought to assess the impact of a previously described air leak test (ALT) on the incidence of OSI following major hepatectomies. METHODS: A single-institution hepatobiliary database was queried for patients who underwent a major hepatectomy without biliary-enteric anastomosis between January 2009 and June 2015. Demographic, clinicopathologic, and intraoperative data-including application of ALT-were analyzed for associations with postoperative outcomes, including OSI, hospital length of stay (LOS), morbidity and mortality rates, and readmission rates. RESULTS: Three hundred eighteen patients were identified who met inclusion criteria, of whom 210 had an ALT. ALT and non-ALT patients did not differ in most disease and treatment characteristics, except for higher rates of trisegmentectomy among ALT patients (53 vs. 34 %, p = 0.002). ALT patients experienced lower rates of OSI and 90-day morbidity than non-ALT patients (5.2 vs. 13.0 %, p = 0.015 and 24.8 vs. 40.7 %, p = 0.003, respectively). In turn, OSI was the strongest independent predictor of longer LOS (OR = 4.89; 95 % CI, 2.80-6.97) and higher rates of 30- (OR = 32.0; 95 % CI, 10.9-93.8) and 45-day readmissions (OR = 29.4; 95 % CI, 10.2-84.6). CONCLUSIONS: The use of an intraoperative ALT significantly reduces the rate of OSI following major hepatectomy and may contribute to lower post-discharge readmission rates.

Prognostic factors after resection of colorectal liver metastases following preoperative second-line chemotherapy: Impact of RAS mutations.

BACKGROUND: After resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM), RAS mutations are associated with modest survival benefit and second-line chemotherapy confers limited hope for cure. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of RAS mutation after second-line chemotherapy for patients undergoing potentially curative liver resection for CLM. METHODS: Among 1357 patients operated for CLM between January 2005 and November 2014, patients with known RAS mutational status were identified. Outcomes after second-line chemotherapy were analyzed by RAS status. RESULTS: Among 635 patients undergoing resection of CLM, 46 received second-line chemotherapy before resection, including 14 patients (30%) with RAS mutations. Patients who received second-line chemotherapy had significantly larger and greater number of liver metastases and were more likely to undergo major hepatectomy. Median overall (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) were significantly worse among patients requiring second-line chemotherapy (OS: 44.4 vs. 61.1 months, p = 0.021; RFS: 7.3 vs. 12.0 months, p = 0.001). Among patients undergoing liver resection after second-line chemotherapy, RAS mutations were associated with worse median OS and RFS (OS: 35.2 vs. 60.7 months, p = 0.038; RFS: 3.6 vs. 8.3 months, p = 0.015). RAS mutation was the only independent factor associated with OS and RFS. All patients with RAS mutations recurred within 18 months. Among patients with RAS wild-type tumors, the receipt of second-line chemotherapy did not affect OS (p = 0.493). CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing resection of CLM after second-line chemotherapy, RAS mutational status is an independent predictor of survival and outweighs other factors to select patients for liver resection.

The utility of the MELD score in predicting mortality following liver resection for metastasis.

BACKGROUND: The MELD score has been demonstrated to be predictive of hepatectomy outcomes in mixed patient samples of primary and secondary liver cancers. Because MELD is a measure of hepatic dysfunction, prior conclusions may rely on the high prevalence of cirrhosis observed with primary lesions. This study aims to evaluate MELD score as a predictor of mortality and develop a risk prediction model for patients specifically undergoing hepatic metastasectomy. METHODS: ACS-NSQIP 2005-2013 was analyzed to select patients who had undergone liver resections for metastases. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis determined the MELD score most associated with 30-day mortality. A literature review identified variables that impact hepatectomy outcomes. Significant factors were included in a multivariable analysis (MVA). A risk calculator was derived from the final multivariable model. RESULTS: Among the 14,919 patients assessed, the mortality rate was 2.7%, and the median MELD was 7.3 (range = 34.4). A MELD of 7.24 was identified by ROC (sensitivity = 81%, specificity = 51%, c-statistic = 0.71). Of all patients above this threshold, 4.4% died at 30 days vs. 1.1% in the group ≤7.24. This faction represented 50.1% of the population but accounted for 80.3% of all deaths (p < 0.001). The MVA revealed mortality to be increased 2.6-times (OR = 2.55, 95%CI 1.69-3.84, p < 0.001). A risk calculator was successfully developed and validated. CONCLUSIONS: MELD>7.24 is an important predictor of death following hepatectomy for metastasis and may prompt a detailed assessment with the provided risk calculator. Attention to MELD in the preoperative setting will improve treatment planning and patient education prior to oncologic liver resection.

Transthoracic Port Placement Increases Safety of Total Laparoscopic Posterior Sectionectomy.

BACKGROUND: Anatomic posterior sectionectomy is performed infrequently due to the challenges of controlling the right posterior portal pedicle (RPPP) while preserving the anterior pedicle (RAPP), difficulty of visualizing the drainage of the right hepatic vein into the IVC, and the potential for significant blood loss during the caval and hepatovenous dissection. PATIENT: A 62-year-old woman with three liver metastases to SVI and SVII from sigmoid colon cancer underwent five cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX and bevacizumab with good response. She underwent a "Primary First" robotic low anterior rectosigmoid resection followed by a laparoscopic posterior sectionectomy. TECHNIQUE: The patient was placed in a Modified French Position. As previously described, a transthoracic trocar was placed for optimal laparoscopic visualization and access of the superior retrohepatic IVC and drainage of the right hepatic vein into IVC. Intraoperative ultrasound was crucial to assess tumor location, define transection plane, and preserve flow to RAPP before division of RPPP. The parenchymal transection follows an oblique angle and exposes the right hepatic vein. CONCLUSIONS: Transthoracic port placement augments the safety of the dissection along the IVC inferiorly and the right hepatic vein superiorly due to direct visualization. Also, it provides a direct instrument-to-target axis without the typical fulcrum of dissecting the postero/superior liver. Laparoscopic ultrasound is critical to confirm preserved flow to the RPPP and guide the parenchymal transection. Liver volumetry should be obtained before surgery to determine adequate future liver remnant if conversion to a right lobectomy becomes necessary.

Meta-analysis of KRAS mutations and survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: In patients with advanced colorectal cancer, KRAS mutation status predicts response to treatment with monoclonal antibody targeting the epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR). Recent reports have provided evidence that KRAS mutation status has prognostic value in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM) irrespective of treatment with chemotherapy or anti-EGFR therapy. A meta-analysis was undertaken to clarify the impact of KRAS mutation on outcomes in patients with resectable CLM. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched systematically to identify full-text articles reporting KRAS-stratified overall (OS) or recurrence-free (RFS) survival after resection of CLM. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 per cent c.i. from multivariable analyses were pooled in meta-analyses, and a random-effects model was used to calculate weight and overall results. RESULTS: The search returned 355 articles, of which 14, including 1809 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies reported OS after resection of CLM in 1181 patients. The mutation rate was 27.6 per cent, and KRAS mutation was negatively associated with OS (HR 2.24, 95 per cent c.i. 1.76 to 2.85). Seven studies reported RFS after resection of CLM in 906 patients. The mutation rate was 28.0 per cent, and KRAS mutation was negatively associated with RFS (HR 1.89, 1.54 to 2.32). CONCLUSION: KRAS mutation status is a prognostic factor in patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases and should be considered in the evaluation of patients having liver resection.

Portal vein embolization improves rate of resection of extensive colorectal liver metastases without worsening survival.

BACKGROUND: Most patients requiring an extended right hepatectomy (ERH) have an inadequate standardized future liver remnant (sFLR) and need preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE). However, the clinical and oncological impact of PVE in such patients remains unclear. METHODS: All consecutive patients presenting at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) requiring ERH at presentation from 1995 to 2012 were studied. Surgical and oncological outcomes were compared between patients with adequate and inadequate sFLRs at presentation. RESULTS: Of the 265 patients requiring ERH, 126 (47·5 per cent) had an adequate sFLR at presentation, of whom 123 underwent a curative resection. Of the 139 patients (52·5 per cent) who had an inadequate sFLR and underwent PVE, 87 (62·6 per cent) had a curative resection. Thus, the curative resection rate was increased from 46·4 per cent (123 of 265) at baseline to 79·2 per cent (210 of 265) following PVE. Among patients who underwent ERH, major complication and 90-day mortality rates were similar in the no-PVE and PVE groups (22·0 and 4·1 per cent versus 31 and 7 per cent respectively); overall and disease-free survival rates were also similar in these two groups. Of patients with an inadequate sFLR at presentation, those who underwent ERH had a significantly better median overall survival (50·2 months) than patients who had non-curative surgery (21·3 months) or did not undergo surgery (24·7 months) (P = 0·002). CONCLUSION: PVE enabled curative resection in two-thirds of patients with CLM who had an inadequate sFLR and were unable to tolerate ERH at presentation. Patients who underwent curative resection after PVE had overall and disease-free survival rates equivalent to those of patients who did not need PVE.

Predicting the sites of metastases from lung cancer using molecular biologic markers.

BACKGROUND: The use of molecular markers in staging non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been supported in retrospective prognostic models but has not been evaluated in predicting sites of metastases. METHODS: Pathologic specimens were collected from 202 patients after complete resection for stage I NSCLC, who were subsequently found to have no metastases at 5 years (n = 108), isolated brain metastases (n = 25), or other distant metastases (n = 69). A panel of eight molecular markers of metastatic potential was chosen for immunohistochemical analysis of the tumor: p53, erbB2, angiogenesis factor viii, EphA2, E-cadherin, urokinase plasminogen activator (UPA), UPA receptor, and plasminogen activator inhibitor. RESULTS: Patients with isolated brain relapse had significantly higher expression of p53 (p = 0.02) and UPA (p = 0.002). The quantitative expression of E-cadherin was used to predict the site of metastases using recursive partitioning: 0 of 92 patients with E-cadherin expression of 0, 1, or 2 developed isolated cerebral metastases; 0 of 33 patients with E-cadherin expression of 3 with UPA of 1 or 2 and ErbB2 of 0 developed brain metastases. Of the remaining patients at risk (UPA = 3), the risk of isolated cerebral metastases was 21 of 57 patients (37%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that molecular markers may predict the site of relapse in early stage NSCLC. If validated in an ongoing prospective study, these results could be used to select patients with isolated brain metastases for adjuvant therapy, such as prophylactic cranial irradiation.

Correlation of FDG-PET imaging with Glut-1 and Glut-3 expression in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To correlate FDG activity on PET with the expression of glucose transporter proteins Glut-1 and Glut-3 in patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Over a 5 year period, all patients with a PET scan and clinical stage I NSCLC underwent an immunohistochemical analysis of their tumor for Glut-1 and Glut-3 expression. The amount of FDG uptake in the primary lesion was measured by a standardized uptake ratio (SUR) and correlated with immunohistochemical results. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients with a mean age of 66 years had clinical stage I disease. The final pathologic stage showed 64 patients with stage IA/B disease, eight with stage IIA disease, and one patient with pathologic stage IIIA (T1N2) disease. Glut-1 transporter expression was significantly higher than Glut-3 (P<0.0001), and although there was some association between the SUR and Glut-1 (P=0.085) and SUR and Glut-3 (P=0.074) expression, this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Glut-1 and Glut-3 transporter expression did not demonstrate a statistically significant correlation with FDG uptake in potentially resectable lung cancer. It appears that these transporters alone do not affect the variation in FDG activity in early stage NSCLC.

Tumor marker expression is predictive of survival in patients with esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine the prognostic value of immunohistochemical tumor marker expression in a population of patients with node-negative esophageal cancer treated with complete resection alone. METHODS: Resection specimens were collected from 61 patients with node-negative T1 (n = 31), T2 (n = 14), and T3 (n = 16) esophageal cancer. A panel of 10 tumor markers was chosen for immunohistochemical analysis, based on associations with differing oncologic mechanisms: apoptosis (p53), growth regulation (transforming growth factor-alpha, epidermal growth factor receptor, and Her2-neu), angiogenesis (factor VIII), metastatic potential (CD44), platinum resistance (p-glycoprotein and metallothionein), 5-fluorouracil resistance (thymidylate synthetase), and carcinogenic detoxification (glutathione S-transferase-pi). RESULTS: Complete resection was performed in all patients (44 adenocarcinoma, 17 squamous cell carcinoma), with no operative deaths. Multivariable analysis demonstrated a significant relationship between cancer-specific death and the following variables: low-level P-gp expression (p = 0.004), high-level expression of p53 (p = 0.04), and low-level expression of transforming growth factor-alpha (p = 0.03). In addition, the number of involved tumor markers present was strongly predictive of negative outcome (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the prognostic value of immunohistochemical tumor markers, specifically the expression pattern of P-gp, p53, and transforming growth factor-alpha, in patients with esophageal carcinoma treated with complete resection alone.

Molecular biologic substaging of stage I lung cancer according to gender and histology.

BACKGROUND: This study is designed to assess molecular biologic substaging according to gender and histology in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Pathologic specimens were collected from 408 consecutive patients after complete resection for stage I NSCLC, with follow-up of at least 5 years. A panel of nine molecular markers was chosen for immunohistochemical analysis of the tumor: recessive oncogenes p53 and bcl-2, the protooncogene erbB-2, KI-67 proliferation index, retinoblastoma oncogene (Rb), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr), angiogenesis factor viii, sialyl-Tn antigen (STN), and CD-44. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to construct a risk model for cancer-specific survival according to marker status, gender, and histologic subtype. RESULTS: Among men, the only molecular marker associated with decreased cancer-specific survival is erbB-2; among women, there are four markers: p53, Rb, CD-44, and factor viii. Among patients with squamous cell carcinoma, the only molecular marker associated with decreased cancer-specific survival is erbB-2; among patients with adenocarcinoma (AC), there are three markers: p53, CD-44, and factor viii. Multivariable analysis of interactions among molecular markers, gender, and histology demonstrates two important relationships (hazard ratio): p53+/women (2.269) and CD-44+/AC (2.266). CONCLUSIONS: Molecular biologic substaging of patients with stage I NSCLC demonstrates differential cancer-specific survival according to marker expression, gender, and histologic subtype.