Effectiveness and clinical implications of the use of topical antibiotics in regenerative endodontic procedures: a review.

Regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) are biologically based procedures planned to replace damaged tissues, including dentinee and root structures, as well as cells of the pulp-dentine complex. Effective sterilization of the root canal is essential in REPs, and antibiotics have been widely used to disinfect root canals. The aim of this paper was to review the scientific literature on (i) Effectiveness of antibiotics used in REPs against bacteria implicated in endodontic disease; (ii) Scientific evidence supporting the use of topical antibiotics in REPs; (iii) Clinical implications of the use of antibiotics in REPs and the possible side effects; (iv) Effect of antibiotics on dental pulp stem cells; and (v) Ongoing research on the use of antibiotics in REPs. Antibiotics used in REPs are effective against bacteria implicated in endodontic infections. Triple antibiotic pastes with minocycline attain complete disinfection of immature teeth with necrotic pulps, without affecting SCAP. Experimental studies carried out in dogs support the use of antibiotics in REPs. Clinical studies report high success rates of RET using antibiotics as intracanal dressings. However, tooth discolouration is an important side effect of the use of TAP. An antibiotic paste containing only metronidazole and ciprofloxacin could be a good alternative to the use of TAP. The use of antibiotic-containing scaffolds or clindamycin-modified triple antibiotic (metronidazole, ciprofloxacin and clindamycin) polymer could be a biologically safe antimicrobial drug delivery system in REPs.

Dental students' knowledge regarding the indications for antibiotics in the management of endodontic infections.

AIM: To determine the knowledge of undergraduate Spanish dental students regarding the indications of systemic antibiotics in the management of endodontic infections. METHODOLOGY: The final year dental students from four Spanish dental schools were requested to answer a one-page questionnaire on the indications for systemic antibiotics in the treatment of endodontic infections. One hundred and seventy-five students were asked to participate in this research. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and chi-square test. RESULTS: One hundred and four students (93.7%) completed satisfactorily the survey and were included in the study. The average duration of antibiotic therapy was 7.0 ± 2.0 days. All respondents chose amoxicillin as the first-choice antibiotic in patients with no medical allergies, alone (47%) or associated with clavulanic acid (53%). The first drug of choice for patients with an allergy to penicillin was clindamycin 300 mg (99%). For cases of irreversible pulpitis, up to 63% of students would prescribe antibiotics. For the scenario of a necrotic pulp, symptomatic apical periodontitis and no swelling, 44% would prescribe antibiotics. Almost 40% of students would prescribe antibiotics for necrotic pulps with asymptomatic apical periodontitis and a sinus tract. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary for the Spanish schools of dentistry to improve students' knowledge about antibiotics and their indications in endodontics. Interactive education analysing real endodontic cases using problem-based learning would help students acquire better skills in prescribing antibiotics in pulp-periapical pathosis.