Medication adherence is influenced by resilience in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: Evidence on the relationship between resilience and medication adherence in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients is lacking. We aimed to examine the impact of resilience on medication adherence in SLE patients. METHOD: In a cross-sectional analysis SLE outpatients were assessed for resilience (Connor-Davison Resilience Scale, CD-RISC), depressive symptoms (CES-D) and medication adherence (Compliance Questionnaire for Rheumatology [CQR]). The disease activity index (mexSLEDAI) and damage (SLICC Damage Index) were administered. Factors independently associated with adherence were identified using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 157 patients, 152 (96.8%) were female with a median age of 45.9 (IQR: 39.0-55.5) years and disease duration of 14 (IQR: 10.0-19.0) years. Medication adherence (CQR ≥80%) and depressive symptoms were found in 74.5% and 43.9% of patients, respectively. Adherent patients had a lower CES-D score and a higher CD-RISC score. In the multivariate analysis adjusting for demographic and clinical confounders, resilience and older age protected against non-adherence (OR 0.96, [95% CI 0.94-0.99] and OR 0.96 [95% CI 0.93-0.98], respectively). CONCLUSION: In SLE patients, resilience and older age, which possibly associated with better medication adherence, may protect against non-adherence.

Associations between resilience and sociodemographic factors and depressive symptoms in women with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To compare resilience in women with SLE and healthy women and determine whether sociodemographic factors and depressive symptoms were associated with resilience in patients with SLE. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. Participants were 123 women with SLE according to the ACR criteria and 132 age-matched healthy women (median = 45 (IQR = 34-54) years). Scales administered were: SLEDAI-2 K for disease activity, Graffar method, SLICC damage index, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and the Spanish version of the Resilience Scale of Wagnild and Young. The statistical analysis was made using the Student t, Mann Whitney, Chi-square, and Spearman's Rho tests and multivariate analysis with a generalized linear model (GLM). Statistical significance was set as p < .05. RESULTS: There were no differences in resilience scores between women with SLE and healthy women (median = 80, IQR = 75-87 vs. median = 80, IQR = 74-86.75, p = .38), although patients with SLE had higher self-efficacy scores (median = 47 IQR = 43-50 vs. median = 45, IQR = 42-48, p = .002) and depressive symptoms (median = 10, IQR = 5-18 vs. median = 8, IQR = 5-18, p = .01). The overall resilience score correlated with depressive symptoms (r = -0.537, p < .01). The GLM showed no association between sociodemographic factors and resilience in patients with SLE. CONCLUSIONS: Resilience did not differ between women with SLE and healthy women. In patients with SLE, depressive symptoms may influence resilience and its domains, but sociodemographic factors do not. PUBLIC HEALTH SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The results suggest that resilience was similar between females with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and age-matched healthy women. Depressive symptoms correlated negatively with resilience in patients with SLE. Sociodemographic factors were not associated with resilience in patients with SLE.