Secondary school teachers and mental health competence: Italy-United Kingdom comparison.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences between teachers' knowledge about early psychosis among three different Italian cities and a UK sample. METHODS: The sample consisted of 556 secondary school teachers from three different cities in Italy (Milan, Rome and Lamezia Terme) and London (UK). The research was based on the Knowledge and Experience of Social Emotional Difficulties Among Young People Questionnaire. The Italian version of the questionnaire was used in Italy. RESULTS: Overall, 67.6% of English teachers, 58.5% of Milan's teachers, 41.8% of Rome's teachers and 33.3% of Lamezia Terme's teachers were able to recognize psychotic symptoms from a case vignette. Logistic regression analysis showed that 'city' was the only independent variable significantly related to the correct/wrong answer about diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: We found statistically significant differences between the three Italian samples and the UK sample regarding teachers' knowledge about first signs of psychosis. English teachers showed a better knowledge than Italian teachers in general. Teachers from Milan, where a specific early detection program was established in 2000, seemed to be more familiar with early signs of psychosis than teachers in the other two Italian towns.

Shades of vulnerability: latent structures of clinical caseness in prodromal and early phases of schizophrenia.

The underlying structures of clinical caseness and need of care in prodromal (i.e., at-risk) and early phases of schizophrenia remain poorly characterized in their essential psycho-behavioral coherence. To identify the schizophrenia proneness-related subtypes within a population of young help-seekers referred to a dedicated, community-based early detection program (Programma 2000). A sample of consecutive referrals (n = 168) for suspected psychosis or first-episode schizophrenia spectrum psychosis received a detailed clinical assessment, including the early recognition inventory for the retrospective assessment of the onset of schizophrenia checklist. We used exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to determine the underlying dimensional structure and latent class analysis (LCA) to identify putative vulnerability subtypes. EFA identified four factors: dysphoria (irritability tension), paranoid autocentrism, introversive withdrawal, and disturbed subjective experience. LCA distinguished three classes, interpretable as carrying different degrees of "proneness to schizophrenia psychosis," which best captured the underlying continuum of clinical severity. The validity of the three classes was supported by distinct patterns of association with major clinical variables (i.e., diagnostic staging at referral). Vulnerability to schizophrenia psychosis in young help-seekers may manifest in three major clinical prototypes, presenting common levels of dysphoria and social withdrawal but different degrees of paranoid autocentrism and disturbed subjective experience. Overall, the results provide the empirical background to dissect shared features of clinical caseness from more schizophrenia-specific vulnerability components. This is of value for the refinement of the clinical staging model as well as for the pragmatic implementation of multiple-gate screening programs.

Expressed emotion in first-episode schizophrenia and in ultra high-risk patients: results from the Programma2000 (Milan, Italy).

Expressed emotion (EE) was examined in a large sample of families of patients with either first-episode psychosis (FEP) within the schizophrenia spectrum, or who met the criteria for ultra high-risk (UHR) of psychosis. The aim of our study was to determine the patterns and relationship of EE with the duration of untreated illness (DUI) or of untreated psychosis (DUP), as well as with illness severity. The sample used in our study included 77 FEP and 66 UHR families. The Camberwell Family Interview was used to assess EE. In both samples, about one-third of patients' families were classified as high EE, with emotional over-involvement (EOI) being the most frequent reason for a family to be classified as high EE. In FEP, higher EE correlated with longer DUI, and higher paternal EOI with longer DUP. DUI, however, was not found to correlate to EE in UHR patients. Severity of illness at the initial assessment did not relate to EE in either FEP or UHR families. Families of FEP and UHR patients were not found to differ in terms of the prevalence of a high EE rating, or of any of its subcomponents. The results of this study only partially support the hypothesis that high EE develops as a reaction to patient status. Patients from families with high EE could possibly benefit from interventions that are targeted at improving their resilience when dealing with problematic family environments.