Incidence of Persistence and Recurrence of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer in Post-surgical Cases From a Tertiary Care Hospital in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Background Despite the excellent prognosis of differentiated thyroid carcinoma, recurrence remains a major concern. However, the persistence of thyroid cancer post-thyroidectomy is not uncommon. We aimed to characterise patients who underwent re-operative surgery for differentiated thyroid carcinoma and analyse the percentage of re-operations that truly were for "recurrent" disease versus the management of persistent disease. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of the hospital database, analysing patients who visited the nuclear medicine department at Mediclinic City Hospital, a tertiary care hospital in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, between 2015 and 2022. The study included patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma who underwent re-operations after total thyroidectomy. Recurrence was defined as the development of disease after a patient had undetectable thyroglobulin and negative radiological scans within one year of the first surgery. Cases were categorised as "recurrent", "persistent", or "unable to classify" in the event of missing data. Results Out of 836 patients diagnosed with differentiated thyroid carcinoma who visited the nuclear medicine department, 71 underwent re-operations. The mean age of these patients was 44.4 years (CI 41.7-47.0), of whom 78.9% were females. Almost half (46.5%) underwent re-operations within the first year, and 98.6% were diagnosed with papillary thyroid carcinoma. We were able to classify 63.4% of cases (n=45) as persistent disease, while 24 cases were categorised as "unable to classify". Only two cases met the criteria for recurrent disease. Conclusion The majority of cases previously classified as "recurrent" in differentiated thyroid carcinoma were found to be a persistent disease, possibly indicating inadequate therapy. Further research may be required to explore the reasons behind this eye-opening rate of disease persistence. This highlights an area for improvement in the management and future outcomes of differentiated thyroid carcinoma patients.

Evaluation of salivary placental growth factor in Health and Periodontitis.

BACKGROUND: Various immune mediators have a role in the progression of periodontitis. Placental Growth Factor (PLGF) is important during pregnancy and also is involved in the pathology of several diseases. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate salivary PLGF in health and periodontitis that seemingly has not been reported earlier. METHODS: Fifty participants were grouped as healthy and periodontitis patients. Clinical history, periodontal parameters [Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), bleeding on probing (BoP)] were recorded; saliva was collected and PLGF was estimated using a commercially available ELISA kit. The data were statistically analyzed using Shapiro-Wilk's test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Dunn's post hoc test with Bonferroni correction, and Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient. The significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05 for all tests. RESULTS: Salivary PLGF levels comparison between the two groups showed no significant difference between both groups. Quantitatively, females had higher salivary PLGF levels than males. No significant association was observed between salivary PLGF levels and the severity of periodontitis. The periodontitis group showed statistically significant correlations between salivary PLGF levels, BoP(p = 0.005) and PPD(p = 0.005), and significant correlations of PLGF with PPD (p = 0.035) for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: PLGF can be detected and measured in the saliva of healthy individuals and periodontitis patients. However, the role of PLGF in periodontal pathology needs to be further confirmed based on their salivary levels.

Management of Infective Endocarditis and Tibioperoneal Mycotic Aneurysm Following COVID-19 Infection.

Introduction: Infective endocarditis and mycotic tibioperoneal aneurysms are rare complications of COVID-19 infection. Medical therapy may not always be sufficient to reduce the high morbidity and mortality associated with these cardiovascular complications. Surgical treatment may need to be considered in such patients. Report: A 56 year old male patient with diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidaemia developed severe pneumonia from COVID-19 infection. He was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at another facility where he was ventilated for a period of six weeks. Blood culture isolated coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and an echocardiogram showed a 1.4 × 1.5 cm mitral valve vegetation. He was treated for a period of 12 weeks with various antibiotic combinations including meropenem, levofloxacin, and teicoplanin with no improvement. On presentation at the current centre, he complained of painful right calf swelling. Computed tomography angiography showed a 7 cm right tibioperoneal trunk aneurysm. He underwent lung and cardiac assessment, following which it was decided to proceed with one stage synchronous surgery. Cardiac surgery was started through a median sternotomy and Guiraudon transeptal approach, with mitral valve replacement using a bioprosthesis (Edwards Magna, size 29). This was immediately followed by a medial lower limb approach with ligation of the aneurysm, followed by arterial reconstruction using a reversed saphenous vein graft from the superficial femoral artery to the posterior tibial artery. He was placed on intravenous vancomycin and ceftriaxone for a period of six weeks. He was discharged home after day 31 on 75 mg aspirin daily. At six month follow up, he was symptom free with a palpable posterior tibial pulse. Discussion: Increased awareness and close surveillance are necessary for patients with severe COVID-19 infection. In those who develop unusual cardiovascular complications, one stage cardiac and vascular surgery may be feasible, as described in this case.

Study design and primary outcome in randomized controlled trials in periodontology. A systematic review.

AIM: The aim of this review is to assess study design and risk of bias related to primary outcome in recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in periodontology. METHOD: An electronic (Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane library) and a manual search were completed to detect RCTs in humans, with an outcome in the field of periodontology and published in English from January 2018 up to March 2020. RESULTS: Data extraction of 318 publications meeting the inclusion criteria was performed by two reviewers. Most studies adopted a parallel-group superiority design in a university setting. Overall, 54% of papers reported the primary outcome and relative sample size calculation, while only 37% also included reproducibility estimates relative to the primary outcome. Papers published in journals with higher impact factors had better compliance with primary outcome reporting and lower overall risk of bias scores. CONCLUSION: Improvements in the quality of RCTs in periodontology are still needed. The importance of defining a clinically relevant study primary outcome and building the study around it needs to be emphasized. Furthermore, RCTs in periodontology could consider, when appropriate, some of the study design options which facilitate application of the principles of personalized medicine.