Comparison of Catheterization Versus Echocardiographic-Based Gradients in Balloon-Expandable Versus Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

OBJECTIVES: In patients with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), accurate assessment of gradients is important to assess valve function and durability, which drives clinical decision-making. We sought to evaluate discrepancies in aortic valve mean gradients with balloon-expandable and self-expanding TAVI. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 507 patients that underwent TAVI and compared mean gradients by catheterization to transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. RESULTS: Mean gradients by Doppler in balloon-expandable (11.0 ± 5.8 mm Hg) and self-expanding devices (8.7 ± 4.5 mm Hg) were significantly higher than catheterization (3.2 ± 4.0 mm Hg vs 3.5 ± 4.1 mm Hg, respectively; P<.001). In a subgroup analysis of skirted valves, Doppler gradients in balloon-expandable (9.8 ± 4.4 mm Hg) and self-expanding devices (8.6 ± 5.1 mm Hg) were significantly higher than catheterization (3.5 ± 4.1 mm Hg vs 4.2 ± 4.8 mm Hg, respectively; P<.001). When the effect of valve size on gradients was analyzed, Doppler gradients were significantly higher than catheterization for all comparisons. When indexed for valve size, patients with large aortas who received a balloon-expandable TAVI had greater pressure differential than those who received a self-expanding TAVI (8.24 ± 0.46 mm Hg vs 5.16 ± 0.66 mm Hg; P<.001). This trend was not seen in patients with a small aorta-to-valve index. CONCLUSION: Following TAVI, aortic valve mean gradients acquired by Doppler were higher than catheterization and the discrepancy was more pronounced in balloon-expandable than self-expanding prostheses. These differences persist in skirted valves and across valve sizes. These observations may reflect periprocedural hemodynamic changes, differences between prosthetic flow acceleration, and/or pressure recovery.

Full Drug-Eluting Stent Jacket: Two-Year Results of a Single-Center Experience With Zilver PTX Stenting for Long Lesions in the Femoropopliteal Arteries.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the 1- and 2-year patency and reintervention rates with the Zilver PTX drug-eluting stent (DES) in long complex femoropopliteal disease. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 89 consecutive patients (mean age 68.7±9.8 years; 86 men) with femoropopliteal occlusive disease (Rutherford category 2-6) treated with the Zilver PTX between December 2012 and December 2013. Mean lesion length for the entire cohort was 24.2±11.3 cm (median 24.0, range 4-48). The patient population was dichotomized into a short lesion (≤20 cm) group (n=41; mean lesion length 13.3±5.6 cm) and the full DES jacket (>20 cm) group (n=48; mean lesion length 33.0±6.5 cm). Primary endpoints were duplex-derived restenosis (peak systolic velocity ratio >2.5), clinically driven reintervention, and major amputation. RESULTS: The incidence of restenosis was lower in the short lesion group at 1 year (19% vs 40% for the longer lesions, p=0.050) and 2 years (39% vs 54%, respectively; p=0.331). The short lesion group had significantly lower rates of reintervention at both 1 year (2% vs 21% in long lesions, p=0.009) and 2 years (12% vs 33%, p=0.019). CONCLUSION: Treatment of femoropopliteal lesions >20 cm with the Zilver PTX appears to be a clinically effective therapy for patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease. However, there is an increase in restenosis and a need for reintervention that continues to progress up to 2 years.