Importance of abortion training to United States Obstetrics and Gynecology residency applicants in 2023.

OBJECTIVE: Nearly half of obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residency programs in the United States lost access to local training in abortion care following the 2022 Dobbs v Jackson Supreme Court decision. We aimed to determine whether OB/GYN residency candidates who desire abortion training apply to programs in states where abortion is restricted/banned. STUDY DESIGN: In 2023, we conducted an anonymous electronic survey of residency interviewees at three large academic OB/GYN programs about the importance of various program characteristics in their selection process. We chose to represent both very restrictive and protective environments for abortion care. We stratified respondents by importance of abortion training in applying to programs (essential or very important [high preference group] vs moderately, slightly, or not important [low preference group]). RESULTS: We analyzed 175 completed surveys (response rate 56%). Of 175 respondents, most (n = 115, 66%) stated that access to abortion training was essential (33%) or very important (33%) when applying to programs. Both high preference group (82%) and low preference group respondents (98%) applied in states where abortion is banned or restricted. Respondents applied in banned/restricted states due to geography, concern about applying to too few programs, and expectation that the program would provide out-of-state training nonetheless. CONCLUSION: The majority of survey respondents who reported that access to abortion training during residency is essential or very important applied to programs where abortion training is not locally available. Most of these applicants expected programs in restricted states to provide training regardless. IMPLICATIONS: Residency programs should be aware of the importance of abortion training to applicants, as well as abortion training expectations, and work to develop opportunities and strengthen training networks in abortion care to meet candidates' needs and ensure adequate learning opportunities exist for all.

Clinic Versus the Operating Room: Determining the Optimal Setting for Dilation and Curettage for Management of First-Trimester Pregnancy Failure.

Introduction There is no clear guidance for the optimal setting for dilation and curettage (D&C) for the management of first-trimester pregnancy failure. Identifying patients at risk of clinically significant blood loss at the time of D&C may inform a provider's decision regarding the setting for the procedure. We aimed to identify risk factors predictive for blood loss of 200mL or greater at the time of D&C. Methods  This is a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with first-trimester pregnancy failure at gestational age less than 11 weeks who underwent surgical management with D&C at a single safety net academic institution between 4/2016 and 4/2021. Patient characteristics and procedural outcomes were abstracted. Women with less than 200mL versus greater than or equal to 200mL blood loss were compared using descriptive statistics, chi-square for categorical variables, and Satterthwaite t-tests for continuous variables. Results A total of 350 patients were identified; 233 met inclusion criteria, and 228 had non-missing outcome data. Mean gestational age was 55 days (SD 9.4). Thirty-one percent (n=70) had estimated blood loss (EBL) ≥200mL. Younger patients (mean 28.7 years vs. 30.9, p=0.038), Latina patients (67.1% vs. 51.9%, p=0.006), patients with higher body mass index (BMI, mean 30.6 vs. 27.3 kg/m2, p=0.006), and patients with pregnancies at greater gestational age (59.5 days vs. 53.6 days, p<0.001) were more likely to have EBL ≥200mL. Additionally, patients with pregnancies dated by ultrasound (34.3% vs. 18.4%, p=0.007), those who underwent D&C in the operating room (81.4% vs. 48.7%, p<0.001), and those who underwent general anesthesia (81.4% vs. 44.3%, p<0.001) were more likely to have EBL ≥200mL. Discussion In this study, patients with EBL ≥200mL at the time of D&C differed significantly from those with EBL<200mL. This information can assist providers in planning the best setting for their patients' procedures.

Observed Versus Expected Distribution of Patient Self-Reported Race and Ethnicity in Quality Improvement Review Processes at a Single Safety Net Academic Institution.

Background While there is a plethora of evidence describing racial and ethnic disparities in obstetric care and outcomes, little has been published evaluating potential inequities in departmental Patient Safety and Quality Improvement (PSQI) processes.  Objective The study aims to describe the distribution of patient-reported race or ethnicity for safety events at a single safety net teaching hospital. We hypothesized that the observed versus expected case distribution for each racial or ethnic group would be similar, signifying proportional representation in the PSQI reporting and review process.  Study design We performed a cross-sectional study including all Safety Intelligence (SI) events filed on obstetric and gynecologic patients and all cases reviewed at monthly PSQI multidisciplinary departmental meetings from May 2016 to December 2021. We compared the distribution of patients' self-reported race or ethnicity as documented in the medical record to our patient population's expected race or ethnicity distribution based on historical institutional data. Results Two thousand and five SI events were filed on obstetric and gynecologic patients. Of those, 411 cases were selected for review by the departmental multidisciplinary PSQI committee, which meets once monthly. Of the 411 cases reviewed by the PSQI committee, 132 met Severe Maternal Morbidity (SMM) criteria defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Fewer SI reports were filed on Asian patients and those who declined to provide race or ethnicity (observed 4.3% versus expected 5.5%, p=0.0088 and 2.9% versus expected 1%, p<0.0001, respectively). For cases reviewed by the departmental PSQI committee and for those which met SMM criteria, there was no significant difference in race/ethnicity distribution. Conclusions There was a disparity between fewer safety events filed for Asian patients and those not reporting race/ethnicity. It was reassuring that our process did not identify other racial/ethnic disparities. However, given the widespread systemic inequities in healthcare, further evaluation of our PSQI process, and PSQI processes beyond our institution, is needed.

Treatment of Recurrent Cesarean Scar Pregnancy With Oral Mifepristone, Systemic Methotrexate, and Ultrasound-Guided Suction Dilation and Curettage.

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP), or pregnancies with implantation in a prior cesarean section scar, are rare but may be becoming more common with an increase in cesarean section deliveries. History of prior CSP may also increase the risk for recurrent CSP. Several treatment options and combinations of treatment options for CSP have been described in the literature. Although the optimal treatment is unclear, the Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine published recommendation guidelines, which include recommendations for the treatment/termination of CSP pregnancies. Treatment of CSP is recommended with operative resection, ultrasound-guided suction dilation and curettage (D&C), or intragestational methotrexate with or without treatment modalities. This is a case report of a patient with recurrent CSP. Her first CSP was incorrectly diagnosed as an incomplete abortion after unsuccessful treatment with misoprostol alone and ultimately was successfully treated with systemic methotrexate. Her second CSP is the basis of this case report and was successfully treated with oral mifepristone and systemic methotrexate (50 milligrams/meter2) before an ultrasound-guided suction D&C at 10 weeks 1 day gestational age. The combination of mifepristone, systemic methotrexate, and suction D&C under ultrasound guidance as a treatment for recurrent CSP has not previously been described in published literature.

Patient Adherence to Follow-Up Recommendations Following Cryotherapy for Treatment of High-Grade Cervical Dysplasia.

Objective Determine the rate of patient adherence to follow-up recommendations after cryotherapy for high-grade cervical lesions, and identify patient characteristics associated with adherence to follow-up. Methods This is a retrospective case series from May 2016 to June 2018 of patients who underwent cryotherapy for high-grade dysplasia at a single academic safety-net hospital. Patient demographics and clinical information were abstracted from the electronic medical record. All patients were recommended to follow up with Pap and high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing 12 months after their procedure. The primary outcome was patient adherence to these recommendations. Descriptive statistics and statistical testing were utilized to compare adherence by demographic and clinical characteristics. A multivariable logistic model was used to preliminarily look at potential factors associated with increased odds of adherence. We further described the proportion of follow-up testing among those patients who adhered to recommendations. Results One hundred and forty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. The adherence percentage was 60.1% (95% CI: 51.6, 68.2). Only employment was associated with follow-up among demographic variables reviewed (p=0.039). Of those who were adherent with follow-up, 4.7% (4/86) had high-grade findings on follow-up Pap testing, and 56.9% (49/86) had negative cytology and negative HPV testing. Conclusion Adherence to follow-up recommendations for the following cryotherapy for high-grade dysplasia within our system was poor, and demographic factors were generally not associated with adherence to follow-up. Given these findings, cryotherapy should be used with caution.

Spontaneous Bilateral Ectopic Pregnancy Treated With Combination of Methotrexate, Unilateral Salpingectomy, and Unilateral Expulsion of Pregnancy.

Spontaneous bilateral ectopic pregnancies are rare. In the majority of case reports, treatments prescribed were methotrexate, bilateral salpingectomy, or salpingectomy/salpingostomy. A 31-year-old gravida 3 para 0 at our institution underwent diagnostic laparoscopy due to ruptured ectopic pregnancy, and based on visual inspection, had a bilateral ectopic pregnancy. She underwent right salpingectomy for a ruptured ectopic pregnancy and had spontaneous expulsion of the left ectopic pregnancy with mobilization of the fallopian tube. She received methotrexate as per the two-dose protocol and was followed with a negative beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (b-hCG). Pathology confirmed bilateral tubal ectopic pregnancies. Spontaneous bilateral tubal ectopic pregnancy requires a high level of clinical suspicion. If a tubal pregnancy has expulsion of tissue intraoperatively, a two-dose protocol for methotrexate administration may be used for treatment, especially in the case of a bilateral ectopic pregnancy with fertility desires.

Effect of an Active vs Expectant Management Strategy on Successful Resolution of Pregnancy Among Patients With a Persisting Pregnancy of Unknown Location: The ACT or NOT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Women with an early nonviable pregnancy of unknown location are at high risk of ectopic pregnancy and its inherent morbidity and mortality. Successful and timely resolution of the gestation, while minimizing unscheduled interventions, are important priorities. Objective: To determine if active management is more effective in achieving pregnancy resolution than expectant management and whether the use of empirical methotrexate is noninferior to uterine evacuation followed by methotrexate if needed. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter randomized clinical trial recruited 255 hemodynamically stable women with a diagnosed persisting pregnancy of unknown location between July 25, 2014, and June 4, 2019, in 12 medical centers in the United States (final follow up, August 19, 2019). Interventions: Eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to expectant management (n = 86), active management with uterine evacuation followed by methotrexate if needed (n = 87), or active management with empirical methotrexate using a 2-dose protocol (n = 82). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was successful resolution of the pregnancy without change from initial strategy. The primary hypothesis tested for superiority of the active groups combined vs expectant management, and a secondary hypothesis tested for noninferiority of empirical methotrexate compared with uterine evacuation with methotrexate as needed using a noninferiority margin of -12%. Results: Among 255 patients who were randomized (median age, 31 years; interquartile range, 27-36 years), 253 (99.2%) completed the trial. Ninety-nine patients (39%) declined their randomized allocation (26.7% declined expectant management, 48.3% declined uterine evacuation, and 41.5% declined empirical methotrexate) and crossed over to a different group. Compared with patients randomized to receive expectant management (n = 86), women randomized to receive active management (n = 169) were significantly more likely to experience successful pregnancy resolution without change in their initial management strategy (51.5% vs 36.0%; difference, 15.4% [95% CI, 2.8% to 28.1%]; rate ratio, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.04 to 1.96]). Among active management strategies, empirical methotrexate was noninferior to uterine evacuation followed by methotrexate if needed with regard to successful pregnancy resolution without change in management strategy (54.9% vs 48.3%; difference, 6.6% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -8.4% to ∞]). The most common adverse event was vaginal bleeding for all of the 3 management groups (44.2%-52.9%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with a persisting pregnancy of unknown location, patients randomized to receive active management, compared with those randomized to receive expectant management, more frequently achieved successful pregnancy resolution without change from the initial management strategy. The substantial crossover between groups should be considered when interpreting the results. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02152696.

Evaluation of Early Pregnancy Concerns in an Early Pregnancy Unit Compared With an Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVE: To assess total time for evaluation of women with first-trimester pregnancy concerns in an early pregnancy unit compared with an emergency department (ED) within a single safety net hospital system. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study at Denver Health Medical Center from May 1, 2017, to April 30, 2018. All patients who presented to the early pregnancy unit and a random sample of patients who presented to the ED were identified, stratified by month. Patients were eligible if they were aged 12-55 years, hemodynamically stable, in the first trimester with a positive pregnancy test, and without a prior ultrasonogram. Evaluation time was calculated as difference between registration or check-in and the discharge time. We extracted patient demographics, reproductive histories, presenting symptoms, diagnosis, and management plans at time of discharge from the electronic medical record. Descriptive statistics and multivariate analyses were performed. Lastly, a preliminary analysis of total charges was conducted. RESULTS: Of 250 patients originally identified, 165 met inclusion criteria (79 from the early pregnancy unit and 86 from the ED). There was no statistical difference in race, ethnicity, or insurance type between groups. Median evaluation time was significantly reduced in the early pregnancy unit compared with the ED (45 minutes [interquartile range 31-61] vs 236 minutes [interquartile range 173-307], respectively, P<.001). After adjusting for patient characteristics and clinical presentation, the average total evaluation time among patients in the early pregnancy unit (36 minutes) was 80% lower compared with patients in the ED (180 minutes). Median evaluation charges were significantly less for patients in the early pregnancy unit compared with those in the ED ($586.22 [interquartile range 384.83-757.34] vs $1,350.97 [interquartile range 975.77-3,553.62], respectively, P<.001). CONCLUSION: Time and charges for evaluation of women with first-trimester pregnancy concerns were significantly lower in an early pregnancy unit compared with an ED. Early pregnancy units should be considered as an alternative care model for patients in the first trimester of pregnancy in the United States.

Attitudes of Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynecology Regarding the Structure of Residency Training.

OBJECTIVE: To measure future and current resident perspectives on obstetrics and gynecology residency training structure and possible future models. METHODS: Medical students invited for obstetrics and gynecology residency interviews and residents (postgraduate year [PGY]-1-4) at the University of Colorado, the University of Washington, the University of California San Francisco, Loyola University, Saint Joseph's Hospital, and Texas A&M in 2017-2018 received a voluntary, electronic survey regarding possible models for restructuring residency training. Student and resident responses were compared using χ test for categorical and two-sample t-test for continuous items. RESULTS: Applicants (63%, 280/444) and residents (66%, 101/153) had similar response rates (overall response rate 64%). Applicants (24%) and residents (29%) reported having concerns about the current structure of residency training. The ideal residency duration was reported as 4 years by 72% of applicants and 85% of residents. Lack of gynecologic surgical volume was the most frequently reported concern among applicants (75%) and residents (72%). Fourth-year tracking (focusing on training aligned with postgraduation career path) was preferred by 90% of applicants and 77% of residents (P=.002) and 92% among respondents planning fellowship. Most applicants (68%) and residents (75%) preferred not starting fellowship training after the 3rd year of residency. DISCUSSION: The majority of learners surveyed support a 4-year training structure but likewise support individualizing training in PGY-4. It is imperative that obstetrics and gynecology leadership consider this and other feedback from learners when considering modifications to the current training paradigm.

Career Expectations of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents and Future Residents.

OBJECTIVE: To understand contemporary fourth-year medical student and resident career expectations in obstetrics and gynecology. METHODS: Students invited for obstetrics and gynecology residency interviews and residents (postgraduate years 1-4) at the University of Colorado, University of Washington, University of California San Francisco, Loyola University, St. Joseph's Hospital, and Texas A&M in 2016-2017 received a voluntary, electronic survey regarding career expectations. Questions were compared between students and residents using a χ test for category responses and for age a two-sample t test. RESULTS: Response rates were similar between students (68% [277/409]) and residents (63% [97/153]). Residents compared with students were more frequently planning to enter private practice (43% vs 19%) and less frequently planning an academic career (19.4% vs 30.4%) or subspecialties (38% vs 51%) (P<.001). Although most respondents planned to work full-time (96% vs 94.9%), 83% (vs 94%) of residents planned to work greater than 40 hours per week (P<.001). Respondents reported greater than $150,000 in educational debt (65%) and anticipated starting salary greater than $200,000 (89%). More residents planned to retire by age 60 years (23% vs 7%) (P<.001). Thirty-eight percent of residents reported having changed career plans during residency, citing work-life balance as the most important factor (89%). DISCUSSION: Trainees' career expectations appear to evolve over time moving toward a higher likelihood to pursue private practice, work fewer hours, and retire earlier despite large educational debt. It is critical that the specialty understand these trends when planning to address national workforce needs.

An Early Pregnancy Unit in the United States: An Effective Method for Evaluating First-Trimester Pregnancy Complications.

In the United Kingdom, early pregnancy assessment clinics have existed since the early 1990s and have become the reference standard for evaluating and treating women with first-trimester pregnancy complications. These units have now been established in many countries and have been found to be effective and efficient, saving money and unnecessary emergency department visits and hospital admissions. To our knowledge, no such model has been described in the United States. A PubMed search using a combination of "early pregnancy unit," "early pregnancy assessment clinic," and "United States," "U.S.," and "America" on May 14, 2017, yielded no results. Denver Health, a safety net hospital in Denver, Colorado, has established the first known early pregnancy unit in the United States. Patients with positive urine pregnancy test results who are in their first trimester by best estimation, have not had a prior ultrasound examination, and present to their primary care providers with pain, bleeding, history of an ectopic pregnancy, history of a tubal ligation, or conception with an intrauterine device in place are eligible to be evaluated in the early pregnancy unit. This article describes our clinical setup, methods, and findings in the first 2 years of the unit's inception with the intention of serving as a model for the establishment of more early pregnancy units throughout the United States.

Obstetricians and Gynecologists of the Future: A Survey of Medical Students Applying to Residency.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the characteristics and career goals of medical students selecting a career in obstetrics and gynecology. METHODS: In 2015-2016, medical students invited for interviews for obstetrics and gynecology residency at the University of Colorado, University of Washington, University of California San Francisco, Loyola University, and New York University received a voluntary 20-item electronic survey regarding factors influencing their choice of medical specialty. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-six of 356 students responded (63%). Mean age was 27 years, and 88% (n=199) were women. General surgery was the most common alternate specialty (36%, n=81). The most commonly cited drawback to obstetrics and gynecology was "long hours" (66%, n=148). After residency, 157 (70%) applicants planned to complete fellowship training, 127 (56%) pursue international work, 156 (69%) seek an academic position, and 207 (92%) practice in an urban setting. One hundred twenty-four applicants (55%) planned to work 51-60 hours per week and 111 (49%) planned to take 2-3 nights of call per month. Two thirds (n=150) predicted they will have greater than $100,000 educational debt on graduation. CONCLUSION: Contemporary residency applicants have high educational debt and disproportionately plan to pursue fellowship, international work, careers in academic medicine, and work in urban centers. Based on the projected career plans among obstetrics and gynecology applicants, the workforce needs of the population may not be met.

Frequency of Adequate Endometrial Biopsy in Evaluation of Postmenopausal Women With Benign Endometrial Cells on Pap Test.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the frequency that endometrial biopsies (EMBs) performed on postmenopausal (PMP) women with benign endometrial cells (BECs) on Pap test are adequate for assessing malignancy or hyperplasia. METHODS: This is a case series including all PMP women older than 55 years at a single academic institution between January 2008 and September 2015 with a Pap test result including BEC. Patients were identified via an internal cytology database. Patient data, the ability to obtain an EMB, and the result of the EMB were collected. An adequate EMB was defined as the presence of glands and stroma sufficient to assess for endometrial hyperplasia and/or malignancy. Descriptive statistics were performed, and then univariable and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate associations of patient factors and adequacy of EMB. RESULTS: One hundred sixteen women met inclusion criteria. One hundred seven had an EMB scheduled (92%) and of those 91 EMBs were obtained (85%). Of the obtained biopsies, 63 were inadequate to rule out the diagnosis of hyperplasia and/or malignancy (69%). Of these, 19 patients underwent pelvic ultrasound (30%), 12 followed up with repeat Pap test (19%), and 4 underwent dilation and curettage (6%). Of the adequate biopsies, 5 had a diagnosis of hyperplasia (18%) and 5 with malignancy (18%). CONCLUSIONS: In PMP women with BEC on Pap test, adequate EMB was only obtained in 31% of patients. Most patients without an adequate biopsy had no further workup of their abnormal Pap test.

Factors Influencing Residency Program Selection by Medical Students Pursuing Obstetrics and Gynecology.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the factors that influence medical student selection of obstetrics and gynecology (ob-gyn) residency programs. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the factors influencing residency program selection by fourth-year medical students pursuing ob-gyn training. METHODS: A voluntary, anonymous, 19-question survey of residency selection factors was distributed to all fourth-year medical students interviewing at 1 of 5 academic ob-gyn departments for a residency position during the 2013-2014 interview season. Participants were surveyed about the relative importance (not important, somewhat important, important) of various residency selection factors, including operative experience, exposure to subspecialties, curricular experience, access to fellowships, and administrative aspects of residency, including adherence to duty hour restrictions. RESULTS: Of 322 potential respondents, 262 (81%) completed the survey. Surgical training and training in laparoscopic surgery were deemed "important" by nearly all respondents (98%, 258 of 262, and 97%, 253 of 262, respectively). Factors that were considered "not important" by a significant group of respondents included maternity/paternity leave policies (22%, 58 of 259); opportunity for international rotations/electives (20%, 51 of 259); exposure to quality and safety initiatives (13%, 34 of 259); and training in abortion (13%, 34 of 262). CONCLUSIONS: Fourth-year medical students identified surgical training as the most important factor in selecting an ob-gyn residency, a finding that is particularly relevant as decreasing and changing surgical volumes affect residency training in this specialty.

Sigmoid Volvulus Complicating Postpartum Period.

Background. Sigmoid volvulus is a rare complication of pregnancy and the puerperium. Case. A 19-year-old patient, gravida 1 para 0 at 41 0/7 weeks of gestation, admitted for late-term induction of labor underwent an uncomplicated primary low transverse cesarean delivery for arrest of descent. Her postoperative period was complicated by sudden onset of abdominal pain and the ultimate diagnosis of sigmoid volvulus. Conclusion. Prompt surgical evaluation of an acute abdomen in the postpartum period is essential; delayed diagnosis and treatment can lead to significant maternal morbidity and mortality.

A Novel Abdominal Hysterectomy Simulator and Its Impact on Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents' Surgical Confidence.

Introduction: The number of abdominal hysterectomies (AHs) performed by OB/GYN residents has decreased dramatically. Thus, there is a need for simulation training to complement operating room experience. Methods: A low-fidelity AH simulator was constructed from craft-store supplies costing less than $40. OB/GYN residents in a single academic program completed the simulation between July and September of 2015. The 1-hour simulation experience included a pretest, a 5-minute presentation, the simulation, and a posttest. On the pre- and posttests, participants rated their confidence with the steps of AH as not at all, somewhat, or very confident. Results: Eighty-six percent (32 of 37) of possible residents completed the session, with even representation from all levels of training (nine PGY 1, seven PGY 2, eight PGY 3, and eight 8 PGY 4 residents). Knowledge of the steps of the procedure and instrumentation improved for all levels of trainees (p < .001). One hundred percent (16 out of 16) of the PGY 1 and PGY 2 residents rated their confidence as increased afterwards, while only 25% (four out of 16) of the PGY 3 and PGY 4 residents did so. Ninety-four percent (30 out of 32) rated the session as very helpful on a scale of not at all, somewhat, or very helpful. Discussion: A low-fidelity, low-cost simulator showed an increase in trainee confidence with AH, particularly in the first- and second-year trainees. Nearly all participants found the exercise helpful, suggesting that it may be beneficial to incorporate into OB/GYN training programs nationwide.

Predictors of Positive Margins at Time of Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify factors associated with the presence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) at surgical margins of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) pathology specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All women evaluated for lower genital tract disease at a single academic institution were prospectively entered into a database. The database was queried for all women who had a LEEP performed for indications within contemporary American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology guidelines between April 1, 2013, and April 30, 2015. Factors extracted from the database included demographics, contraception, weight, tobacco use, provider volume, resident participation, history of cervical procedure, and pathology features including preceding Pap test category. A positive margin was defined as HSIL on either the endocervical or ectocervical margin of the LEEP specimen or in endocervical curettage specimen after LEEP. We performed univariable statistics to identify factors associated with positive margins and then logistic regression modeling on significant factors for the outcome of positive margins. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-nine women were identified. Seventy five (27.8%) of these women had positive margins. Only tobacco use, gravity, parity, and preceding Pap category were significant on univariable analysis. After multivariable analysis, smokers remained more likely to have positive margins (odds ratio = 2.01; CI = 1.12-3.6; p < .01) as did those with preceding HSIL Pap tests (odds ratio = 1.96; CI = 1.13-3.41; p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: In our population, of all the factors assessed, only tobacco use and preceding high-grade Pap tests were associated with positive margins at time of LEEP. This information may be helpful in preprocedural planning to optimize treatment.