Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cureus ; 16(5): e60866, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38910608

RESUMO

Preeclampsia, a complex multisystem disorder predominantly impacting the kidneys and liver, manifests through hypertension and organ dysfunction in expectant mothers. Preeclampsia can also cause ocular signs, but they are uncommon. Exudative retinal detachment (ERD) is one such unusual but dangerous consequence. A thorough clinical description and therapy of a patient who experienced exudative retinal detachment while experiencing preeclampsia are provided in this study. A 28-year-old Saudi female, with no medical or surgical history, underwent an emergency cesarean section (CS) due to severe preeclampsia and failed induction of labor. The patient complained of painless blurry vision, with central dark spot and decreased vision starting from labor daytime. The patient was admitted to the hospital for blood pressure monitoring and further investigations. The patient was started on hydralazine intravenous (IV) and labetalol PO to control BP. The patient was delivered by cesarean section for preeclampsia with severe features after the failure of labor induction, and she had improved her vision by four weeks postpartum. Retinal detachment as a consequence of preeclampsia is conservatively managed, with a generally favorable prognosis. Previous studies have consistently emphasized the critical importance of a multidisciplinary approach that fosters collaboration between obstetricians and ophthalmologists. This collaborative strategy not only ensures comprehensive care but also facilitates early detection, timely intervention, and improved management outcomes for conditions affecting both maternal health and ophthalmic well-being during pregnancy.

3.
Cureus ; 15(8): e43594, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37719605

RESUMO

Objective This study aims to investigate referral patterns to pediatric rheumatology and assess the correctness of referrals from primary care physicians and pediatric specialties. Methodology A cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted on all patients who were referred to the Pediatric Rheumatology Department since 2015 (N = 282) at King Abdullah Specialized Children's Hospital (KASCH), Pediatric Rheumatology Clinic. Age, gender, reason for referral, clinical features, referring department, and final diagnosis were taken as variables. Data were collected through the documents and records of the cases (referrals) in the electronic medical records system of the hospital (BestCare). Then Excel was used for data entry, and JMP statistical software, version 14.0.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for data analysis. Results In a total of 282 patients across the Pediatric Rheumatology Clinic, KASCH, the most common reason for referral to the clinic was joint pain (112, 43%) and the least common reason was rash (6, 2.3%). The most common diagnosis was juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) (24, 26.6%). The majority of patients referred to the rheumatology department did not have a rheumatological disease (169, 65%). The majority of the referrals were from pediatrics subspecialties (168, 65%). The least referred department was primary care ( 21, 8%). Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study showing the referral pattern, accuracy, and profile of a pediatric rheumatology clinic population in Saudi Arabia. Expectedly, the most common reason for referral was arthralgia. The most common diagnosis was JIA. According to the results, most of the referrals were inaccurate as they did not end up with a rheumatological diagnosis. Pediatric subspecialties should be more aware of the nature of rheumatological disease to avoid over-referrals. Finding a pattern of referrals to pediatric rheumatology is an excellent modality to accomplish early diagnosis and the best possible prognosis.

4.
Cureus ; 15(8): e44245, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37772248

RESUMO

Background This research study investigates the prevalence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in trauma patients undergoing emergency laparotomies. AKI is a common complication in major surgeries and is associated with various adverse effects. The study aims to explore the relationship between AKI and other comorbidities in this specific context. Methodology This is a retrospective cohort study. All patients who had laparotomy after abdominal trauma at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) and met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Nonprobability consecutive sampling was used. Data were collected by chart review using the Best-Care system at KAMC. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize and describe the characteristics of the study participants. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for categorical variables, such as comorbidities. For continuous variables, mean and standard deviations were calculated and tabulated. All statistical calculations were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results This research study included 152 patients who underwent laparotomy, and the majority of patients (146, 96%) did not experience AKI. Several comorbidities were observed, with hypertension and diabetes being the most prevalent at 37 (24.3%) and 35 (23%), respectively. Intraoperative hypotension was experienced by 23 (15.1%) patients, while 129 (84.9%) did not have this issue. Norepinephrine was the most common vasopressor used (25.7%), followed by ephedrine and a combination of norepinephrine and epinephrine. Gender and age groups did not show significant associations with AKI, comorbidities like diabetes, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) demonstrated significant relationships with AKI. There was no significant difference in eGFR and serum creatinine baseline levels between patients meeting AKI criteria and those who did not. Conclusions The low overall incidence of AKI in this patient population is encouraging. However, healthcare professionals must be aware of the significant impact of comorbidities such as diabetes, heart failure, and CKD on AKI development. Vigilant monitoring of postoperative kidney function, particularly serum creatinine levels within the first 48 hours, is essential for early detection and timely intervention. By understanding and addressing these risk factors, healthcare providers can take proactive steps to prevent and manage AKI in patients undergoing laparotomy, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes and reduced healthcare costs.

5.
Cureus ; 15(6): e40445, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37325685

RESUMO

Introduction Alopecia areata (AA) is a complex autoimmune condition that causes nonscarring hair loss. In Saudi Arabia, AA accounts for 1-2% of new dermatological outpatient visits. It typically presents with sharply demarcated round patches of hair loss and may present at any age. Traditional medical therapies include corticosteroids and immunotherapy. Choosing the ideal treatment depends on multiple factors such as patient age, disease severity, efficacy, side effects, and remission rate. Recent medications that have been used for treating AA are Janus kinase inhibitors. Aim The aim of the study is to assess the awareness and attitude of dermatologists and their use of Tofacitinib in treating AA. Method A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2019 across 14 major cities in Saudi Arabia. A self-administered online questionnaire was specifically developed and used. Dermatologists from government hospitals and private clinics were included through non-probability convenience sampling. The collected data was entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed using SPSS program version 24. Results In total, out of 546 Dermatologists across Saudi Arabia who responded to the questionnaire, 127 (23.2%) physicians prescribed Tofacitinib in their practice. Out of those who prescribed the drug for AA cases, 58 dermatologists (45.6%) prescribed Tofacitinib after the failure of steroid injections. Among the 127 dermatologists who have utilized Tofacitinib in their practice, 92 (72.4%) believe that Tofacitinib is effective in treating AA. Almost 200 (47.7%) Dermatologists who never prescribed Tofacitinib reported that the main reason was due to the unavailability of the drug in the clinic they were practicing. Conclusions To conclude, out of 546 dermatologists working in Saudi Arabia, 127 (23.2%) prescribe Tofacitinib to treat AA. Ninety-two (72.4%) of the participants reported the effectiveness of Tofacitinib. Two hundred (47.7%) dermatologists who never prescribe Tofacitinib reported that the main reason was due to the unavailability. However, this would raise the need for more research regarding JAK inhibitors generally and Tofacitinib specifically, focusing on the effectiveness versus the side effects of Tofacitinib.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...