Solid phase-based cross-matching as solution for kidney allograft recipients pretreated with therapeutic antibodies.

In order to select recipients without donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies, the complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-CM) was established as the standard procedure about 40 years ago. However, the interpretability of this functional assay strongly depends on the vitality of isolated donors' lymphocytes. Since the application of therapeutic antibodies for the immunosuppressive regimen falsifies the outcome of the CDC-crossmatch as a result of these antibodies' complement-activating capacity in the recipients' sera, we looked for an alternative methodical approach. We here present 27 examples of AB0 blood group-incompatible living kidney allograft recipients who, due to their treatment with the humanized chimeric monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody Rituximab, did not present valid outcomes of CDC-based pretransplant cross-matching. Additionally, four cases of posttransplant cross-matching after living kidney allografting and consequent treatment with the therapeutic anti-CD25 antibody Basiliximab (Simulect) due to acute biopsy-proven rejection episodes are presented and compared regarding CDC- and ELISA-based crossmatch outcomes. In all cases, it became evident that the classical CDC-based crossmatch was completely unfeasible for the detection of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies, whereas ELISA-based cross-matching not requiring vital cells was not artificially affected. We conclude that ELISA-based cross-matching is a valuable tool to methodically circumvent false positive CDC-based crossmatch results in the presence of therapeutically applied antibodies.

Sensitive solid-phase detection of donor-specific antibodies as an aid highly relevant to improving allograft outcomes.

Transplant recipients who have had sensitizing events such as pregnancies, blood transfusions and previous transplants often develop antibodies directed against human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-molecules of the donor tissue. These pre-formed donor-specific antibodies (DSA) represent a high risk of organ failure as a consequence of antibody-mediated hyper-acute or acute allograft rejection. As a first assay to detect DSA, the complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity assay (CDC) was established more than 40 years ago. However, this assay is characterized by several drawbacks such as a low sensitivity and a high susceptibility to various artificial factors generally not leading to valid and reliable outcomes under several circumstances that are reviewed in this article. Furthermore, only those antibodies that exert complement-fixing activity are detected. As a consequence, novel procedures that act independently of the complement system and that do not represent functional assays were generated in the format of solid phase assays (SPAs) (bead- or ELISA-based). In this article, we review the pros and cons of these sensitive SPA in comparison with the detection of DSA through the use of the traditional methods such as CDC and flow cytometric analyses. Potential drawbacks of the alternative methodological approaches comprising high background reactivity, susceptibility to environmental factors and the possible influence of subjective operators' errors concerning the interpretation of the results are summarized and critically discussed for each method. We provide a forecast on the future role of SPAs reliably excluding highly deleterious DSA, thus leading to an improved graft survival.

A novel ELISA-based crossmatch procedure to detect donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies responsible for corneal allograft rejections.

Previous studies had shown that donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies may highly influence the survival rate of corneal allografts, although the anterior chamber generally represents an immune-privileged compartment of the eye. We postulated that the introduction of a novel crossmatch procedure for the detection of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies in recipients awaiting a corneal graft would be adequate to investigate their influence on the outcome of the graft survival. The Antibody Monitoring System (AMS) HLA class I & II crossmatch ELISA was adapted for the use of material from the outer scleral rim instead of blood lymphocytes to isolate the donors' HLA molecules. In case of detectable donor-specific anti-HLA class I and/or class II antibodies (DSA) this result was confirmed using an identification ELISA to specify the detectable recipient's anti-HLA antibodies. PCR-based genetic tissue typing of the donors was performed also using their outer scleral rims. 45 recipients of corneal grafts were analyzed for DSA prior to or after grafting, respectively. 75% of the recipients with preformed DSA exhibited immunological complications up to the complete graft loss in four cases during the first two months. In contrast 77% of the recipients without DSA did not show any complications during the follow up period of averagely 18months. Only two cases of graft loss were observed in this group after 17 and 23months, respectively. The results demonstrate the impact of preventing donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies which are for the first time reliably detectable in any laboratory's daily work using the adapted AMS-ELISA.

Aberrant expression of HLA-B*3565Q is associated with a disrupted disulfide bond.

The identification of expression variants is a challenge in HLA diagnostics. We here describe the identification of the novel allele HLA-B*3565Q. The serological HLA class I type, as determined by a lymphocytotoxicity test, was A11,24; B38; Bw4; Cw-; whereas PCR-sequence-specific primers resulted in A*11,*24, B*35,*38; Cw*12, thus suggesting the presence of a nonexpressed B*35 allele. To clarify the lack of serological HLA-B35 reactivity, exons 2 and 3 were sequenced following haplotype-specific amplification. At position 564 from the beginning of the coding region (exon 3), a transversion (C-->G) was observed, which, at the amino acid level, results in a substitution from cysteine to tryptophane at position 164 of the mature polypeptide. Because this position is essential for the formation of a disulfide bond linking the cysteine residues at positions 101 and 164, which is strongly conserved in functional class I molecules of vertebrates, the disruption of this bond is very likely to be the reason for the lack of serological detectability. We later found the same novel allele in a second unrelated individual, of whom we were able to establish a lymphoblastoid cell line (B-LCL). Serological testing of this B-LCL indicated a very low aberrant expression of HLA-B*3565Q, which cannot be expected to be detected by standard serology techniques.