Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 44(2): 218-227, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36702504

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fully automatic quantification methods of spinal cord compartments are needed to study pathologic changes of the spinal cord GM and WM in MS in vivo. We propose a novel method for automatic spinal cord compartment segmentation (SCORE) in patients with MS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cervical spinal cords of 24 patients with MS and 24 sex- and age-matched healthy controls were scanned on a 3T MR imaging system, including an averaged magnetization inversion recovery acquisition sequence. Three experienced raters manually segmented the spinal cord GM and WM, anterior and posterior horns, gray commissure, and MS lesions. Subsequently, manual segmentations were used to train neural segmentation networks of spinal cord compartments with multidimensional gated recurrent units in a 3-fold cross-validation fashion. Total intracranial volumes were quantified using FreeSurfer. RESULTS: The intra- and intersession reproducibility of SCORE was high in all spinal cord compartments (eg, mean relative SD of GM and WM: ≤ 3.50% and ≤1.47%, respectively) and was better than manual segmentations (all P < .001). The accuracy of SCORE compared with manual segmentations was excellent, both in healthy controls and in patients with MS (Dice similarity coefficients of GM and WM: ≥ 0.84 and ≥0.92, respectively). Patients with MS had lower total WM areas (P < .05), and total anterior horn areas (P < .01 respectively), as measured with SCORE. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate a novel, reliable quantification method for spinal cord tissue segmentation in healthy controls and patients with MS and other neurologic disorders affecting the spinal cord. Patients with MS have reduced areas in specific spinal cord tissue compartments, which may be used as MS biomarkers.


Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla , Humanos , Esclerose Múltipla/complicações , Esclerose Múltipla/diagnóstico por imagem , Esclerose Múltipla/patologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Medula Espinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Medula Espinal/patologia , Substância Cinzenta/patologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos
2.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 40(9): 1592-1600, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31439628

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Currently, accurate and reproducible spinal cord GM segmentation remains challenging and a noninvasive broadly accepted reference standard for spinal cord GM measurements is still a matter of ongoing discussion. Our aim was to assess the reproducibility and accuracy of cervical spinal cord GM and WM cross-sectional area measurements using averaged magnetization inversion recovery acquisitions images and a fully-automatic postprocessing segmentation algorithm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cervical spinal cord of 24 healthy subjects (14 women; mean age, 40 ± 11 years) was scanned in a test-retest fashion on a 3T MR imaging system. Twelve axial averaged magnetization inversion recovery acquisitions slices were acquired over a 48-mm cord segment. GM and WM were both manually segmented by 2 experienced readers and compared with an automatic variational segmentation algorithm with a shape prior modified for 3D data with a slice similarity prior. Precision and accuracy of the automatic method were evaluated using coefficients of variation and Dice similarity coefficients. RESULTS: The mean GM area was 17.20 ± 2.28 mm2 and the mean WM area was 72.71 ± 7.55 mm2 using the automatic method. Reproducibility was high for both methods, while being better for the automatic approach (all mean automatic coefficients of variation, ≤4.77%; all differences, P < .001). The accuracy of the automatic method compared with the manual reference standard was excellent (mean Dice similarity coefficients: 0.86 ± 0.04 for GM and 0.90 ± 0.03 for WM). The automatic approach demonstrated similar coefficients of variation between intra- and intersession reproducibility as well as among all acquired spinal cord slices. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel approach including the averaged magnetization inversion recovery acquisitions sequence and a fully-automated postprocessing segmentation algorithm demonstrated an accurate and reproducible spinal cord GM and WM segmentation. This pipeline is promising for both the exploration of longitudinal structural GM changes and application in clinical settings in disorders affecting the spinal cord.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Substância Cinzenta/anatomia & histologia , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Neuroimagem/métodos , Medula Espinal/anatomia & histologia , Adulto , Feminino , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valores de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...