Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 38(Suppl 2): 347-353, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35600498

RESUMO

Lung transplant patients are at increased risk of infection due to immunosuppression. Vaccination is a key source of protection; however, after transplant, patients tend to have diminished host response. This is an important concern given the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Less is known about how transplant patients respond to COVID-19 vaccination and how best to approach immunization in the setting of a global pandemic. Lung transplant patients, and solid organ transplant patients as whole, have a less robust immune response after COVID-19 vaccination. This article reviews the literature on vaccine immune response in transplant patients with a focus on COVID-19 vaccination and international society guidelines.

3.
Med Sci Educ ; 30(2): 971-976, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34457755

RESUMO

The concept of providing focused, competency-based LGBTQ+ health education outside the setting of health professional programs, specifically for undergraduates, is quite uncharted. However, the issue at the core of our rationale is one shared by those with and without clinical exposure: how to best support the development of cultural competence in providers who are or will be caring for LGBTQ+ patients. Traditional health professional education programs have enacted a number of curricular initiatives in this regard, designed for advanced learners. By focusing specifically on the undifferentiated learner, we offer a new perspective on the timing of LGBTQ+ health-related education. Our course is not intended to supplant the critical learning and application that must occur in the clinic or hospital room. Rather, we present a framework for cultivating understanding of the healthcare issues faced by the LGBTQ+ community that may help a learner to acquire and apply skills subsequently with greater cultural competence.

4.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 471(10): 3112-9, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23519927

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is a major cause of morbidity. Multiple patient comorbidities have been identified as SSI risk factors including obesity, tobacco use, diabetes, immunosuppression, malnutrition, and coagulopathy. However, the independent effect of multiple individual patient factors on risk of subsequent periprosthetic infection is unclear. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study are (1) to collect data on several preestablished infection risk factors in addition to SSI-related data on a large TJA cohort; and (2) to use multivariate modeling on previously established patient risk factors to determine independent preoperative predictors of SSI. METHODS: We reviewed records of patients undergoing TJA from January 1, 2010, to July 30, 2012. Confirmation of SSI followed published guidelines for superficial, deep, and periprosthetic. A total of 29 culture-positive SSIs (1.5% total) and 1846 controls were identified. The prevalence of known patient-specific infection risk factors was determined for both infected cases and healthy control subjects followed by multiple regression analysis to determine independent risk. RESULTS: Isolated organisms consisted of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; 34.5%) followed by gram-negative rods (31.0%). After adjusting for anatomic site, independent risk factors for infection include: revision surgery (odds ratio [OR], 2.28; confidence interval [CI], 1.26-3.98), super obesity (body mass index>50 kg/m2; OR, 5.28; CI, 1.38-17.1), diabetes mellitus (OR, 1.83; CI, 1.02-3.27), tobacco abuse (OR, 2.96; CI, 1.65-5.11), MRSA colonization or infection (OR, 4.17; CI, 1.63-9.66), and current or prior bone cancer (OR, 3.86; CI, 1.21-12.79). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple patient comorbidities independently contribute to infection risk after TJA. Preoperative TJA infection risk stratification may be feasible and should be investigated further. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Substituição/efeitos adversos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Obesidade/complicações , Prognóstico , Reoperação , Fatores de Risco , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/complicações
5.
HSS J ; 7(2): 141-4, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22754414

RESUMO

A retrospective analysis of 221 patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty between January 2007 and April 2008 was performed to look at rates of total transfusions, allogenic transfusions, and autogenic transfusions. Two senior surgeons performed all the surgeries. During that period, patients in group A (129 patients) all donated one unit of autologous blood and patients in group B (92 patients) did not donate. Within both groups, patients were further divided by preoperative hemoglobin level as either anemic or non-anemic. A hemoglobin of 12.5 g/dL was used as the cutoff. Ninety-eight patients in group A (76%) required autologous blood. Patients in group A received a higher total number of transfusions (0.93 per patient) than those in group B (0.33 per patient; p < 0.001). The rate of allogenic transfusion was lower for group A (14%) than for group B (25%; p < 0.033). The reduction of allogenic transfusions associated with preoperative autologous blood donation was confined to anemic patients (29% in group A vs 72% in group B; p = 0.0006). There was no difference in allogenic blood transfusions in non-anemic patients between group A (8%) and group B (9%; p = 0.91). Limiting autologous blood donation to anemic patients decreased cost compared to routine autologous blood donation (US $256.63/patient versus US $511.44/patient) without exposing patients to increased allogenic blood transfusions. Targeted blood management in total knee replacement surgery decreases transfusion rates and reduces cost.

6.
HSS J ; 6(1): 66-70, 2010 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19967462

RESUMO

To avoid the potential risks of allogeneic transfusion during total hip arthroplasty (THA), the use of preoperative autologous blood donation (PABD) has been utilized. We performed a retrospective chart review of 283 patients undergoing THA that either donated 1 U of autologous blood (188 patients) or did not donate autologous blood before surgery (95 patients) in order to investigate the difference in postoperative transfusion rate (autologous and allogeneic), the incidence of allogeneic transfusion, and the difference in cost of each protocol. In addition, the study compared transfusion rates in patients with and without preoperative anemia (hemoglobin (Hb) ≤ 12.5 g/dL). At 0.75 transfusions per patient versus 0.22 transfusions per patient, the PABD patients had a significantly higher overall transfusion rate. PABD significantly reduced the need for allogeneic blood in anemic patients (Hb ≤ 12.5 g/dL) from 52.6% to 11.8%. PABD did not have the same affect in nonanemic patients (allogeneic transfusion rate 5.7% versus 4.0%). The study demonstrated that nonanemic patients undergoing THA do not benefit from PABD, but it is effective for anemic patients.

7.
HSS J ; 5(1): 45-8, 2009 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19083062

RESUMO

The increased blood loss and resulting need for allogenic blood has been a major concern of one-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One hundred eighteen consecutive patients donating either 2 units (87 patients) or 3 units (31 patients) of autologous blood prior to one-stage bilateral TKA were retrospectively evaluated to determine: (1) how many patients received allogenic transfusion; (2) what percentage of autologous blood was wasted; and (3) whether donating 2 or 3 units of autologous blood before surgery is more cost-effective. Fifteen patients in the 2-units donation group (17.2%) and one patient in the 3-units donation group (3.2%) required allogenic blood transfusions. In the 2-units group, 37.9% of the patients wasted 21.8% of predonated autologous blood, and in the 3-units group, 64.5% of the patients wasted 32.3% of predonated autologous blood. The estimated cost for patients donating 2 or 3 units of blood was $1,814.17 and $1,996.10, respectively. Donating 2 units of autologous blood is more cost-effective; however, patients donating 3 units of blood required less allogenic blood.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...