Predictive value of dynamic arterial elastance for vasopressor withdrawal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Dynamic arterial elastance (Eadyn) has been investigated for its ability to predict hypotension during the weaning of vasopressors. Our study focused on assessing Eadyn's performance in the context of critically ill adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit, regardless of diagnosis. MAIN BODY: Our study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis checklist. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023421462) on May 26, 2023. We included prospective observational studies from the MEDLINE and Embase databases through May 2023. Five studies involving 183 patients were included in the quantitative analysis. We extracted data related to patient clinical characteristics, and information about Eadyn measurement methods, results, and norepinephrine dose. Most patients (76%) were diagnosed with septic shock, while the remaining patients required norepinephrine for other reasons. The average pressure responsiveness rate was 36.20%. The synthesized results yielded an area under the curve of 0.85, with a sensitivity of 0.87 (95% CI 0.74-0.93), specificity of 0.76 (95% CI 0.68-0.83), and diagnostic odds ratio of 19.07 (95% CI 8.47-42.92). Subgroup analyses indicated no variations in the Eadyn based on norepinephrine dosage, the Eadyn measurement device, or the Eadyn diagnostic cutoff to predict cessation of vasopressor support. CONCLUSIONS: Eadyn, evaluated through subgroup analyses, demonstrated good predictive ability for the discontinuation of vasopressor support in critically ill patients.

Efectos del reto de líquidos sobre el acople ventrículo arterial en un biomodelo porcino de choque endotóxico / The effect of fluid challenge on ventriculo-arterial coupling in an endotoxic shock swine bio-model

Introducción: el reto de líquidos es una prueba que consiste en administrarlos y medir la respuesta hemodinámica mediante el cambio del gasto cardíaco (GC), aunque solo medir el GC resulta insuficiente. El acople ventrículo-arterial (AVA) (elastancia arterial efectiva/ elastancia telesistólica: Eae/Ets) aparece como una variable que evalúa el estado cardiocirculatorio en forma integral. Objetivo: evaluar el AVA en un biomodelo de choque endotóxico y durante retos de líquidos. Materiales y métodos: biomodelo de choque endotóxico (9 porcinos). Se midieron variables hemodinámicas cada hora desde un tiempo 0 (T0) hasta T6. Se realizaron 5 retos de líquidos entre T0 y T4. El tiempo de hipotensión se denominó TH0. Se calcularon diferencias de medianas de variables entre T0-T4. Se clasificaron los retos en dos grupos según el delta del AVA (AVA posreto-AVA prerreto), en ΔAVA≤0 o >0, se midieron variables antes y después de cada reto. Se determinó la relación lactato/piruvato (L/P) en T0, T3 y T6, se establecieron correlaciones entre la diferencia LP T6-T0 y de variables hemodinámicas. Resultados: el AVA aumentó (1.58 a 2,02, p=0.042) por incremento en la Eae (1.74 a 2,55; p=0.017). El grupo ΔAVA≤0 elevó el GC (4.32 a 5,46, p=0.032) y el poder cardíaco (PC) (0.61 a 0,77, p=0,028). El Δ L/P se correlacionó con el Δ del índice de choque sistólico y diastólico (r=0.73), pero no con el del AVA. Conclusión: durante el choque endotóxico el AVA aumentó de manera significativa. Durante el reto de líquidos el grupo Δ AVA≤0, elevó el GC y PC. El Δ L/P no se correlacionó con variables del AVA.

Introduction: fluid challenges (FCs) consist of measuring hemodynamic response through changes in cardiac output (CO) after fluid administration, although only measuring CO proves insufficient. Ventriculo-arterial coupling (V-A) (effective arterial elastance / tele-systolic elastance: E(a)/Ets) are variables used for a comprehensive cardiac and circulatory status appraisal. Objective: to evaluate V-A in an endotoxic shock bio-model by FCs. Materials and methods: an endotoxic shock bio-model (9 pigs). Hemodynamic variables were measured every hour from time 0 (T0) to T6. Five FCs were performed between T0 and T4. Hypotension time was referred to as HT. The median differences in variables between T0-T4 were calculated. Challenges were classified into two groups according to V-A delta (post-challenge V-A - pre-challenge V-A). In ΔV-A≤0 o>0, variables were measured before and after each FC. The lactate to pyruvate (L/P) ratio was determined at T0, T3 and T6. Correlations between the LP T6-T0 difference and hemodynamic variables, were established. Results: V-A increased (1.58 to 2,02, p=0.042) as Eae increased (1.74 to 2.55; p=0.017). CO (4.32 to 5.46, p=0.032) and cardiac power (CP) (0.61 to 0.77, p=0,028) increased, in the ΔV-AC≤0 group. The ΔLP correlated with the systolic and diastolic shock index (r=0.73), but not with V-A. Conclusion: V-A increased significantly during endotoxic shock. The ΔAVA≤0 group, showed elevated CO and CP during FC. ΔLP did not correlate with any of the V-A variables.

Variables influencing the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acutely ill patients might be influenced by a number of clinical and technical factors. We aim to identify variables potentially modifying the operative performance of fluid responsiveness predictors commonly used in clinical practice. METHODS: A sensitive strategy was conducted in the Medline and Embase databases to search for prospective studies assessing the operative performance of pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation, passive leg raising (PLR), end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT), mini-fluid challenge, and tidal volume challenge to predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill and acutely ill surgical patients published between January 1999 and February 2023. Adjusted diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were calculated by subgroup analyses (inverse variance method) and meta-regression (test of moderators). Variables potentially modifying the operative performance of such predictor tests were classified as technical and clinical. RESULTS: A total of 149 studies were included in the analysis. The volume used during fluid loading, the method used to assess variations in macrovascular flow (cardiac output, stroke volume, aortic blood flow, volume‒time integral, etc.) in response to PLR/EEOT, and the apneic time selected during the EEOT were identified as technical variables modifying the operative performance of such fluid responsiveness predictor tests (p < 0.05 for all adjusted vs. unadjusted DORs). In addition, the operative performance of fluid responsiveness predictors was also influenced by clinical variables such as the positive end-expiratory pressure (in the case of EEOT) and the dose of norepinephrine used during the fluid responsiveness assessment for PLR and EEOT (for all adjusted vs. unadjusted DORs). CONCLUSION: Prediction of fluid responsiveness in critically and acutely ill patients is strongly influenced by a number of technical and clinical aspects. Such factors should be considered for individual intervention decisions.

Changes of operative performance of pulse pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in endotoxin shock.

Several limitations regarding pulse pressure variation (PPV) use have been reported. Our aim was to describe changes in the PPV operative performance as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during the development of a swine endotoxin shock model and to assess hemodynamic variables associated with PPV changes. A swine porcine endotoxin shock model was established (Escherichia Coli 055:B5 endotoxin) in 7 pigs, and 3 pigs were included in the control group. The endotoxin was infused until the mean arterial pressure (MAP) dropped below 50 mmHg (TH0); then, the model animal was reanimated with fluids and vasopressors. We performed fluid challenges every hour for 6 h. ROC curve analysis and a linear mixed model were performed. The area under the curve of PPV decreased from 0.95 (0.81-1.00) to 0.60 (0.17-1.00) at TH0. Its cutoff increased from 10.5 to 22.00% at TH0. PPV showed an inverse relationship with stroke volume, mean systemic filling pressure, MAP, and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (p < 0.001, AIC = 111.85). The PPV operative performance as a predictor of fluid responsiveness decreased with the progression of shock. This could lead to an inverse association between PPV and the following variables: MAP and SVR.

Predictors of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients mechanically ventilated at low tidal volumes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness have shown good performance in mechanically ventilated patients at tidal volumes (Vt) > 8 mL kg-1. Nevertheless, most critically ill conditions demand lower Vt. We sought to evaluate the operative performance of several predictors of fluid responsiveness at Vt ≤ 8 mL kg-1 by using meta-regression and subgroup analyses. METHODS: A sensitive search was conducted in the Embase and MEDLINE databases. We searched for studies prospectively assessing the operative performance of pulse pressure variation (PPV), stroke volume variation (SVV), end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT), passive leg raising (PLR), inferior vena cava respiratory variability (Δ-IVC), mini-fluid challenge (m-FC), and tidal volume challenge (VtC), to predict fluid responsiveness in adult patients mechanically ventilated at Vt ≤ 8 ml kg-1, without respiratory effort and arrhythmias, published between 1999 and 2020. Operative performance was assessed using hierarchical and bivariate analyses, while subgroup analysis was used to evaluate variations in their operative performance and sources of heterogeneity. A sensitivity analysis based on the methodological quality of the studies included (QUADAS-2) was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 33 studies involving 1,352 patients were included for analysis. Areas under the curve (AUC) values for predictors of fluid responsiveness were: for PPV = 0.82, Δ-IVC = 0.86, SVV = 0.90, m-FC = 0.84, PLR = 0.84, EEOT = 0.92, and VtC = 0.92. According to subgroup analyses, variations in methods to measure cardiac output and in turn, to classify patients as responders or non-responders significantly influence the performance of PPV and SVV (p < 0.05). Operative performance of PPV was also significantly affected by the compliance of the respiratory system (p = 0.05), while type of patient (p < 0.01) and thresholds used to determine responsiveness significantly affected the predictability of SVV (p = 0.05). Similarly, volume of fluids infused to determine variation in cardiac output, significantly affected the performance of SVV (p = 0.01) and PLR (p < 0.01). Sensitivity analysis showed no variations in operative performance of PPV (p = 0.39), SVV (p = 0.23) and EEOT (p = 0.15). CONCLUSION: Most predictors of fluid responsiveness reliably predict the response of cardiac output to volume expansion in adult patients mechanically ventilated at tidal volumes ≤ 8 ml kg-1. Nevertheless, technical and clinical variables might clearly influence on their operative performance.

Use of Pulse Pressure Variation as Predictor of Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Ventilated With Low Tidal Volume: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Pulse pressure variation (PPV) has been shown to be useful to predict fluid responsiveness in patients ventilated at tidal volume (Vt) >8 mL kg-1. Nevertheless, most conditions in critical care force to use lower Vt. Thus, we sought to evaluate the operative performance of PPV when a Vt ⩽8 mL kg-1 is used during mechanical ventilation support. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase databases for articles evaluating the operative performance of PPV as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in critical care and perioperative adult patients ventilated with tidal volume ⩽8 mL kg-1 without respiratory effort and arrhythmias, between January 1990 and January 2019. We included cohort and cross-sectional studies. Two authors performed an Independently selection using predefined terms of search. The fitted data of sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were assessed by bivariate and hierarchical analyses. RESULTS: We retrieved 19 trials with a total of 777 patients and a total of 935 fluid challenges. The fitted sensitivity of PPV to predict fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation at Vt ⩽8 mL kg-1 was 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-0.73), the specificity was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73-0.84), and the AUC was 0.75. The diagnostic odds ratio was 5.5 (95% CI: 3.08-10.01, P < .001) by the random-effects model. CONCLUSIONS: Pulse pressure variation shows a fair operative performance as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in critical care and perioperative patients ventilated with a tidal volume ⩽8 mL kg-1 without respiratory effort and arrhythmias.

Predictors to Intravenous Fluid Responsiveness.

Management with intravenous fluids can improve cardiac output in some surgical patients. Management with static preload indicators, such as central venous pressure and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, has not demonstrated a suitable relationship with changes in the cardiac output induced by intravenous fluid therapy. Dynamic indicators, such as the variability of arterial pulse pressure or stroke volume variation, have demonstrated a suitable relationship. Since improvement in cardiac output does not guarantee an adequate perfusion pressure, in patients with hypotension, it is also necessary to know whether arterial pressure will also increase with intravenous fluid therapy. In this regard, the functional assessment of arterial load by dynamic arterial elastance could help to determine which patients will improve not only their cardiac output but also their mean arterial pressure.

Prueba de elevación de piernas pasiva / The passive leg raising test (PLR)

Introduction: The passive leg raising test (PLR) allows physicians to determine which patients require treatment with intravenous fluids. Objectives: It is important to be aware of tools that help us to determine the response to the passive leg raising test, as well as understanding in which clinical situations it can be performed. Materials and methods: Non-systematic review. Medline and PubMed databases were consulted in search of relevant articles. Results: Through echocardiography, pulse pressure and capnography can be determined as a response to leg raising. Conclusions: This article explores the tools that are useful in determining the response to this maneuver, and the clinical conditions in which it is indicated.

Introducción: la prueba de elevación de piernas pasivas permite determinar en qué paciente se requiere manejo con líquidos endovenosos. Objetivos: es importante conocer las herramientas que ayudan a determinar la respuesta a la prueba de elevación de piernas pasiva, además conocer en qué situaciones clínicas se puede realizar. Materiales y métodos: revisión no sistemática. Se consultaron las siguientes bases de datos Medline y Pubmed, en búsqueda de artículos relevantes. Resultados: mediante ecocardiografía, presión de pulso y capnografía se puede determinar la respuesta a la elevación de piernas. Conclusiones: el presente artículo explora las herramientas que son útiles para determinar la respuesta a esta maniobra y las condiciones clínicas donde se indica.