Impact of Capacity Building in the Organ Donation Activity During an International Society of Nephrology The Transplantation Society Sister Transplant Center (ISN-TTS STC) Partnership.

This article explores the impact of a partnership program involving the International Society of Nephrology-The Transplantation Society, the Southern Philippines Medical Center, and the University of Barcelona. The program included capacity building and partnership with the Donation and Transplant Institute, leading to the creation of 5 Intermediate Transplant Procurement Management courses for Southern Philippines Medical Center's healthcare professionals. The study analyzed organ donation activity and training records from 2016 to 2022, dividing the periods pre- and postSister Transplant Center partnership, and further subdividing to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results showed an increase of 474.39% in donor referrals by 2019, which then dropped significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2022, a reimplementation of training opportunities led to a 657% increase in referrals. Capacity building through education, training, and partnerships has a direct and positive impact on organ donation activity, even in the face of challenging circumstances like a global pandemic.

Knowledge Exchange Program to Increase the Organ Donation Rates in Saudi Arabia.

The present study presents the results of a collaborative program in Saudi Arabia, aiming to improve deceased organ donation rates. Launched in 2017, the program involved implementing a training program and quality management system in conjunction with the Donation and Transplantation Institute and the Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation. The study summarizes 2 phases of the program, including the implementation of key performance indicators and a continuous improvement plan. Results revealed a 198% increase in potential donor detection and a 44% increase in donation rates in the pilot program. The second phase, applying a 3-level methodology in selected hospitals, led to a 40% increase in utilized organ donors. The creation of in-hospital organ donation units showed the best results, and the program emphasizes the importance of continuous training and quality management to achieve optimal organ donation outcomes.

Improvement Gaps to Deal with the Shortage of Lungs for Transplant From a Middle Income Country's Perspective.

OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to identify the potential causes for the low lung procurement rate in Argentina and to develop strategies to the actual problems in donor management focused on lung retrieval. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a crosssectional study in which we analyzed data obtained from digital self-reported surveys conducted on professionals participating in the organ procurement process in Argentina. The surveys included questions on donor management, selection criteria, and resource availability involving increasing lung procurement. RESULTS: Among professionals surveyed, 23.7% did not use advanced hemodynamic monitoring in their donor maintenance and limited their use to central venous pressure. Only 35.8% of participants considered maintaining central venous pressure <10 mm Hg during donor maintenance. With regard to donors with severe deterioration of the ejection fraction, 47.4% of participants would not use restrictive fluid, and only 23.2% would use an advanced monitoring of the hemodynamic status to guide fluid management. Only 27.8% of participants routinely would use steroids to improve lung function in donors. With regard to mechanical ventilation, 80.4% of participants used protective ventilation, but only 4.10% used it adequately. Recruitment maneuvers were routinely used by only 3.1% of those surveyed. With regard to expanded selection criteria (age >55 years, smoking habit of >20 packs/year, positive upper airway cultures, unspecific infiltrates in radiography, and >72 hours of mechanical ventilation), 92.8% of surveyed participants would discount patients with some of these expanded selection criteria without considering offering the lungs for donation. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities for improvement may involve training physicians involved in the donor maintenance process and reviewing the donor selection criteria used to increase adherence to expanded selection criteria.

How does the methodological clinical evaluation impact organ donation? Experience from 4 Organ Procurement Organizations (OPO)

INTRODUCTION: The lack of a clear and reproducible methodology for evaluating potential organ donors, which ensures traceability in the process, can compromise the number of utilized organ donors and the transplantation quality. METHODOLOGY: We developed a reproducible and safe method for the evaluation and validation of Potential Organ Donors (PD) based on 2 principles:1) Updated knowledge of absolute contraindications for organ donation and, 2) Decision making supported by 3 questions. The first principle was absolute contraindications. They were categorized into 4 groups: A) Serologies, B) Tumors, C) Infections, and D) Biological risk for transmission of infectious diseases and cancer. The second principle was the decision-making questions: A) What is the cause of death? B) Are there absolute contraindications to organ donation? and, C) Are there relative contraindications to organ donation? Each PD was subjected to the same methodology. The questions were answered after knowing the PD's clinical file. The PD was valid only if the set of answers adhered to an established matrix respecting different guidelines. The same physician evaluated each PD in all OPO. We applied in 4 different OPO, 3 of them in the State of São Paulo/Brazil and one in the United Arab Emirates, in different periods, including the SARS-COV 2 pandemic. RESULTS: OPO­SCSP, before the methodology (2007): 62 utilized donors, 205 transplants. After the methodology has been started (2008/2009/2010): 117, 154, 186 utilized donors and 348, 533, 487 transplants, respectively. 2) OPO-BTU, before the methodology (2009): 9 utilized donors and 19 transplants. After the methodology has been started (2010/2011/2012): 17, 36, 49 utilized donors and 38, 90, 143 transplants, respectively. 3) OPO-IDPC, before the methodology (2017): 93 utilized donors and 202 transplants. After the methodology has been started (2018/2019/2020): 107, 177, 187 utilized donors and 219, 395, 356 transplants, respectively. 4) UAE OPO, before the methodology (2020): 9 utilized donors and 35 transplants. After the methodology has been started (2021/2022): 39, 55 utilized donors and 147, 203 transplants, respectively. The percentage increase after the beginning of the methodology, considering the last year evaluated: 1) OPO-SCSP: 195% (Utilized donors) and 137% (Transplants); 2) OPO-BTU: 444% (Utilized donors) and 652% (Transplants); C) OPO-IDPC: 101% (Utilized Donors) and 76% (Transplants); 4) OPO-EOTC (United Arab Emirates): 511% (Utilized donors) and 480% (Transplants). CONCLUSION: The methodology used demonstrates that it can directly contribute to increasing the percentage of effective donors and transplants. The increase in donors ranged from 101% to 444%. The percentage growth of transplantation ranged from 76% to 652%. Indirectly, an increase the referrals was observed, motivated by frequent contact with OPO members and ICU professionals.