Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pediatr Surg ; 54(4): 740-743, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30249358

RESUMO

PURPOSE: There has been a paradigm shift from corticosteroid to propranolol treatment for infantile hemangiomas (IHs), with surgical resection reserved for complicated or persistent IHs. The purpose of this study was to determine if propranolol treatment was associated with decreased utilization of surgical resection compared to corticosteroids. METHODS: A single center retrospective chart review of all corticosteroid or propranolol treated IHs between 2005 and 2014 was performed. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with the primary outcome of requiring surgical intervention. RESULTS: Of 652 patients with IH, 52 were treated with oral corticosteroids and 195 with propranolol only. Surgical intervention was required in 14 (27%) of steroid patients vs 18 (9%) of propranolol patients (p < .001). On multivariable analysis patients treated with steroids had 3.3 the odds of requiring surgery when compared to propranolol patients (p = .001). Prematurity (<37 weeks) was also associated with increased odds of surgery (OR = 2.8, p = .003). CONCLUSION: Patients treated with propranolol required significantly fewer surgical interventions than those treated with corticosteroids suggesting a more efficacious treatment paradigm. Prematurity increases the need for surgical intervention regardless of the modality of medical treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, treatment study.


Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Hemangioma/tratamento farmacológico , Propranolol/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Hemangioma/cirurgia , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Pediatr Surg ; 52(5): 826-831, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28188036

RESUMO

PURPOSE: An accelerated clinical care pathway for solid organ abdominal injuries was implemented at a level one pediatric trauma center. The impact on resource utilization and demonstration of protocol safety was assessed. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively on patients admitted with blunt abdominal solid organ injuries from 2012 to 2015. Patients were subdivided into pre- and post-protocol groups. Length of hospital stay (LOS) and failure of non-operative treatment were the primary outcomes of interest. RESULTS: 138 patients with solid organ injury were studied: 73 pre- (2012-2014) and 65 post-protocol (2014-2015). There were no significant differences in age, gender, injury severity score (ISS), injury grade, or mechanism (p>0.05). LOS was shorter post-protocol (mean 5.6 vs. 3.4days; median 5 .0 vs. 3.0days; p=0.0002), resulting in average savings of $5966 per patient. Patients in the protocol group mobilized faster (p<0.0001) and experienced fewer blood draws (p=0.02). On multivariate analysis, protocol group (p<0.001) and ISS (p<0.001) were independently associated with LOS. There were no differences between groups in the need for operation, embolization, or transfusion. CONCLUSION: An accelerated care pathway is safe and effective in the management of pediatric solid organ injuries with early mobilization, less blood draws, and decreased LOS without significant morbidity and mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, cost effectiveness, level III.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais/terapia , Procedimentos Clínicos , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Traumatismos Abdominais/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominais/economia , Adolescente , Alberta , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Clínicos/economia , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Segurança do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Traumatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/economia
3.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 63(11): 1911-4, 2016 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27273326

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome (BRBNS) is a rare multifocal venous malformation syndrome involving predominantly the skin and gastrointestinal tract. Traditional treatment modalities include corticosteroids, interferon-α, sclerotherapy, and aggressive surgical resection. Sirolimus has been used in several single case reports. PROCEDURE: We performed a single-institution retrospective review of four children with BRBNS, who received sirolimus as part of their treatment regimens. A diagnosis of BRBNS was based on clinical, radiologic, and pathologic criteria. RESULTS: Median age was 6.5 years (range: 2-16 years). Pathologic evaluations revealed a combined malformation with venous and lymphatic components. The novel finding of a lymphatic component was confirmed with PROX-1 immunostaining. Patients received oral sirolimus with target drug levels between 10 and 13 ng/ml. Responses to treatment were defined as stabilization/decrease in size of lesions; resolution of transfusion requirements; reduction in pain, and improvement in quality of life (QOL). Median time to response was 1.5 months (SD ± 0.96 month, range: 1-3 months). Median follow-up was 21 months (range: 18-26 months). Lesion size and characteristics improved in all patients. All patients reported decrease in pain and improvement in QOL. All three patients requiring transfusions became transfusion-independent. One patient had resolution of coagulopathy. Adverse effects of sirolimus consisted of mucositis in three patients and neutropenia in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Sirolimus is safe and efficient for the treatment of BRBNS. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of this drug. This is the first report that identifies a lymphatic component as part of BRBNS.


Assuntos
Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Nevo Azul/tratamento farmacológico , Sirolimo/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino , Nevo Azul/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sirolimo/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/psicologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...