Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Open Heart ; 6(2): e001069, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31413846

RESUMO

Objective: To validate the Intra-aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II (IABP-SHOCK II) score in patients with cardiogenic shock after ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with pharmacoinvasive strategy (PhIS) and to analyse the influence of ischaemia time on different risk strata. Methods: We analysed 2143 patients with STEMI who underwent reperfusion with tenecteplase in primary health services between May 2010 and April 2017 and were transferred to a tertiary hospital for cardiac catheterisation and continuity of care. Those who evolved to cardiogenic shock were scored as low (0-2), moderate (3-4) or high (5-9) risk of death in 30 days and pairwise-log-rank test was used to compare strata. Time intervals between symptoms onset and lytic (pain-to-needle) and fibrinolytic-catheterisation were also compared. Results: Cardiogenic shock occurred in 212 (9.9%) individuals. The 30-day mortality using the IABP-SHOCK II score was 26.6% for low-risk (n=94), 53.2% for moderate-risk (n=62) and 76% for high-risk (n=25) analysed patients (p<0.001). Validation of the score showed good discrimination for death, area under the curve of 0.73 (CI: 0.66 to 0.81; p<0.001). The median intervals of pain-to-needle and fibrinolytic-catheterisation showed no association with the group stratification (220 vs 251 vs 200 min; p=0.22 and 390 vs 435 vs 315 min; p=0.18, respectively). Conclusions: In patients with cardiogenic shock after STEMI treated with PhIS, risk stratification using IABP-SHOCK II score was adequate. There was no influence of pain-to-needle and fibrinolytic-catheterisation times on the ability to the score model stratification.

4.
Arq Bras Cardiol ; 91(2): e25-7, 2008 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês, Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18709253

RESUMO

The patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is a common type of congenital heart defect and its correction is simple when performed early in life. Surgery is performed using stitches or clips. In adults, the anomaly can lead to pulmonary hypertension and ventricular dysfunction. Surgery in adults is controversial and high-risk. This report describes an alternative endovascular approach in an adult patient.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Permeabilidade do Canal Arterial/cirurgia , Implantação de Prótese/métodos , Adulto , Permeabilidade do Canal Arterial/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Arq. bras. cardiol ; 91(2): e17-e19, ago. 2008. ilus
Artigo em Inglês, Português | LILACS | ID: lil-488903

RESUMO

A persistência do canal arterial (PCA) é uma anomalia relativamente freqüente e de simples correção. A correção envolve a ligadura do ducto com ou sem a sua secção. A anomalia em adultos pode provocar hipertensão pulmonar persistente e disfunção ventricular. A correção em adultos é controversa e de maior risco. Um caso de correção endovascular com acesso intra-abdominal da PCA em adulto é descrito.


The patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is a common type of congenital heart defect and its correction is simple when performed early in life. Surgery is performed using stitches or clips. In adults, the anomaly can lead to pulmonary hypertension and ventricular dysfunction. Surgery in adults is controversial and high-risk. This report describes an alternative endovascular approach in an adult patient.


Assuntos
Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Permeabilidade do Canal Arterial/cirurgia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Implantação de Prótese/métodos , Permeabilidade do Canal Arterial/diagnóstico , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Arq Bras Cardiol ; 79(4): 405-18, 2002 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês, Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12426649

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To verify the results after the performance of primary coronary angioplasty in Brazil in the last 4 years. METHODS: During the first 24 hours of acute myocardial infarction onset, 9,434 (12.2%) patients underwent primary PTCA. We analyzed the success and occurrence of major in-hospital events, comparing them over the 4-year period. RESULTS: Primary PTCA use increased compared with that of all percutaneous interventions (1996=10.6% vs. 2000=13.1%; p<0.001). Coronary stent implantation increased (1996=20% vs. 2000=71.9%; p<0.001). Success was greater (1998=89.5% vs. 1999=92.5%; p<0.001). Reinfarction decreased (1998=3.9% vs. 99=2.4% vs. 2000=1.5%; p<0.001) as did emergency bypass surgery (1996=0.5% vs. 2000=0.2%; p=0.01). In-hospital deaths remained unchanged (1996=5.7% vs. 2000=5.1%, p=0.53). Balloon PTCA was one of the independent predictors of a higher rate of unsuccessful procedures (odds ratio 12.01 [CI=95%] 1.58-22.94), and stent implantation of lower mortality rates (odds ratio 4.62 [CI=95%] 3.19-6.08). CONCLUSION: The success rate has become progressively higher with a significant reduction in reinfarction and urgent bypass surgery, but in-hospital death remains nearly unchanged. Coronary stenting was a predictor of a lower death rate, and balloon PTCA was associated with greater procedural failure.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/estatística & dados numéricos , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/mortalidade , Brasil/epidemiologia , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Razão de Chances , Prognóstico , Recidiva , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Arq. bras. cardiol ; 79(4): 405-418, Oct. 2002. tab
Artigo em Português, Inglês | LILACS, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: lil-323361

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To verify the results after the performance of primary coronary angioplasty in Brazil in the last 4 years. METHODS: During the first 24 hours of acute myocardial infarction onset, 9,434 (12.2 percent) patients underwent primary PTCA. We analyzed the success and occurrence of major in-hospital events, comparing them over the 4-year period. RESULTS: Primary PTCA use increased compared with that of all percutaneous interventions (1996=10.6 percent vs. 2000=13.1 percent; p<0.001). Coronary stent implantation increased (1996=20 percent vs. 2000=71.9 percent; p<0.001). Success was greater (1998=89.5 percent vs. 1999=92.5 percent; p<0.001). Reinfarction decreased (1998=3.9 percent vs. 99=2.4 percent vs. 2000=1.5 percent; p<0.001) as did emergency bypass surgery (1996=0.5 percent vs. 2000=0.2 percent; p=0.01). In-hospital deaths remained unchanged (1996=5.7 percent vs. 2000=5.1 percent, p=0.53). Balloon PTCA was one of the independent predictors of a higher rate of unsuccessful procedures (odds ratio 12.01 [CI=95 percent] 1.58-22.94), and stent implantation of lower mortality rates (odds ratio 4.62 [CI=95 percent] 3.19-6.08). CONCLUSION: The success rate has become progressively higher with a significant reduction in reinfarction and urgent bypass surgery, but in-hospital death remains nearly unchanged. Coronary stenting was a predictor of a lower death rate, and balloon PTCA was associated with greater procedural failure


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Infarto do Miocárdio , Prognóstico , Recidiva , Brasil , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Stents , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Infarto do Miocárdio
8.
Arq. bras. cardiol ; 76(6): 483-495, June 2001. tab
Artigo em Português, Inglês | LILACS, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: lil-286366

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a comparative analysis of the in-hospital outcomes of patients who underwent primary percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTCA) or stent implantation because of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) related to an acute vein graft occlusion. METHODS: Since 1991 the Brazilian Society of Hemodynamic and Interventional Cardiology has maintained a large database (CENIC). From these, we selected all consecutive patients, who underwent primary PTCA or stenting in the first 24 hours of AMI, with the target vessel being an occluded vein graft. Immediate results and major coronary events occurring up until hospital discharge were analyzed. RESULTS: During this period, 5,932 patients underwent primary PTCA or stenting; 158 (3 percent) of the procedures were performed because of an acute vein graft occlusion. Stenting was performed in 74 (47 percent) patients. Patients treated with stents had a higher success rate and lower mean residual stenosis compared with those who underwent primary balloon PTCA. The incidence of reinfarction and death were similar for stenting and balloon PTCA. CONCLUSION: Primary percutaneous treatment of AMI related to acute vein graft occlusion is still an uncommon practice. Primary stenting improved luminal diameter and offered higher rates of success; however, this strategy did not reduce the in-hospital reinfarction and death rate, compared with that occurring with PTCA treatment


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Adulto , Veia Safena/transplante , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Stents , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/terapia , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Brasil/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Resultado do Tratamento , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade
9.
Arq. bras. cardiol ; 63(3): 179-184, set. 1994. ilus, graf
Artigo em Português | LILACS | ID: lil-155547

RESUMO

PURPOSE--Comparative and prospective evaluation of three methods (transthoracic echo-Doppler (TTE), computerized tomography (CT) and aortography (AORT) utilized for aortic dissection diagnosis. METHODS--The 39 patients with confirmed aortic dissection (surgery or autopsy) underwent, within a few hours of each other, all three methods scrutinized. There were 19 cases of type A and 20 of type B dissection. RESULTS--In type A dissection the methods were equivalent (TTE = 73.7//, CT = 84.2//, AORT = 73.7//p = NS) but for type B, TTE was significantly inferior to the other two methods (TTE = 60//, TC 90//, AORT = 80//, p < 0.05 for TTE, for TC and AORT p = NS). In three occasions, even though all three methods were performed, the diagnosis was not obtained. CONCLUSION--The methods which were evaluated make the diagnosis in the majority of cases. In type A all methods are similar, however, in type B, TC and AORT are superior to TTE. Even performing all three methods in each patient, in three instances the diagnosis was not made


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aortografia , Ecocardiografia Doppler , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Dissecção Aórtica/diagnóstico , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Diagnóstico Diferencial
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...