Mechanical osteoarthritis of the hip in a one medicine concept: a narrative review.

Human and veterinary medicine have historically presented many medical areas of potential synergy and convergence. Mechanical osteoarthritis (MOA) is characterized by a gradual complex imbalance between cartilage production, loss, and derangement. Any joint instability that results in an abnormal overload of the joint surface can trigger MOA. As MOA has a prevailing mechanical aetiology, treatment effectiveness can only be accomplished if altered joint mechanics and mechanosensitive pathways are normalized and restored. Otherwise, the inflammatory cascade of osteoarthritis will be initiated, and the changes may become irreversible. The management of the disease using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics, physical therapy, diet changes, or nutraceuticals is conservative and less effective. MOA is a determinant factor for the development of hip dysplasia in both humans and dogs. Hip dysplasia is a hereditary disease with a high incidence and, therefore, of great clinical importance due to the associated discomfort and significant functional limitations. Furthermore, on account of analogous human and canine hip dysplasia disease and under the One Medicine concept, unifying veterinary and human research could improve the well-being and health of both species, increasing the acknowledgement of shared diseases. Great success has been accomplished in humans regarding preventive conservative management of hip dysplasia and following One Medicine concept, similar measures would benefit dogs. Moreover, animal models have long been used to better understand the different diseases' mechanisms. Current research in animal models was addressed and the role of rabbit models in pathophysiologic studies and of the dog as a spontaneous animal model were highlighted, denoting the inexistence of rabbit functional models to investigate therapeutic approaches in hip MOA.

Distraction index measurement on the dog's hip joint using a dedicated software / [Medição do índice de distração da anca do cão usando um software especial]

The aim of this study was to test the accuracy of a new automated computer software tool for the assessment of passive hip laxity. The hip laxity was estimated using the dedicated computer software by two blinded evaluators, one previously trained and one without specific training for distraction index measurement, in two independent sessions using 230 hip joints from 115 dogs that underwent screening for passive hip laxity using the distraction view. Previously, all of these radiographs were sent to PennHIP Analysis Center for an official distraction index record. The measurement repeatability of the two sessions was adequate for both evaluators. The reproducibility of the official distraction index measurement, mean distraction index±standard deviation 0.44±0.15, was adequate (P>0.05) for the trained evaluator, 0.44±0.15, and non-adequate (P<0.05), for the non-trained evaluator 0.47±0.17. The distraction index measurement tool proposed can be used with confidence for hip laxity evaluation by trained evaluators, as it provided good repeatability and reproducibility of official reports. The simplicity of the process described leads to a less time-consuming and more affordable procedure.(AU)

O objetivo deste estudo foi testar a viabilidade de uma nova ferramenta de software informático para avaliação da lassitude articular passiva da articulação coxofemoral. A lassitude articular da articulação coxofemoral foi estimada usando-se um programa informático especial, desenvolvido para o efeito, por dois avaliadores, um com treino prévio e outro não treinado, na medição do índice de distração, em duas sessões independentes, utilizando-se 230 articulações coxofemorais de 115 cães, as quais efetuaram o rastreio de displasia coxofemoral realizando a projeção de distração da articulação coxofemoral. Previamente, todas as radiografias foram enviadas para o PennHIP Analysis Center, para se obter uma medida oficial do índice de distração. A repetibilidade das medições das duas sessões foi adequada para ambos os avaliadores. A reprodutibilidade do índice de distração oficial, média±desvio-padrão 0,44±0,15, foi adequada (P>0,05) para o avaliador treinado, 0,44±0,15, e não adequada (P>0,05) para o avaliador não treinado, 0,47±0,17. A ferramenta de medição do índice de distração proposta pode ser usada com segurança na medição do índice de distração por avaliadores treinados, uma vez que mostra uma adequada repetibilidade e reprodutibilidade das medições oficiais do índice de distração. A simplicidade do processo apresentado torna-o menos demorado e mais econômico.(AU)